Posted by robusk on 11/15/2010 9:08:00 AM (view original):Posted by rlahann on 11/14/2010 10:45:00 PM (view original):I think you guys are crazy...even with my predisposition to try to fukk up VD's game, that deal isn't close to veto worthy.Not surprisingly, I agree... Â I approved that ***** as well.
Posted by rlahann on 11/14/2010 10:45:00 PM (view original):I think you guys are crazy...even with my predisposition to try to fukk up VD's game, that deal isn't close to veto worthy.
Posted by jwelsh1023 on 11/16/2010 8:57:00 AM (view original):My guess is a third.
Posted by AlCheez on 11/16/2010 8:07:00 AM (view original):Posted by robusk on 11/15/2010 9:08:00 AM (view original):Posted by rlahann on 11/14/2010 10:45:00 PM (view original):I think you guys are crazy...even with my predisposition to try to fukk up VD's game, that deal isn't close to veto worthy.Not surprisingly, I agree... Â I approved that ***** as well.Hmmmmmm.
Posted by AlCheez on 11/16/2010 9:33:00 AM (view original):I'm fine with the veto even though I didn't think it necessary, but when did anyone start caring about one-sided deals in $? We couldn't even stop blatent collusion last season.
Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement
© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.