Posted by cbriese on 11/16/2010 1:35:00 PM (view original):But this is more fun.
Posted by vandydave on 11/16/2010 1:27:00 PM (view original):Posted by cbriese on 11/16/2010 11:59:00 AM (view original):Posted by vandydave on 11/16/2010 10:22:00 AM (view original):Posted by jwelsh1023 on 11/16/2010 10:17:00 AM (view original):Posted by AlCheez on 11/16/2010 10:08:00 AM (view original):VD won the deal, no question, but we've let worse go through without even a mention. Like I said, I get the veto, I just don't get why it came now. I think Briese takes TJ Peters too siriusly.In all honesty, I wouldn't have looked at it had briese not made a stink. But I didn't veto because of briese.this trade does not threaten the integrity of the league, nor is it a vet owner stealing from a noob owner. its two owners who traded probably 20+ offers back and forth before finding a deal. if we are going to veto deals where one team gets the better side in public opinion then probably 75% of deals need to be vetoed from here on out. and Briese has become high and mighty on his success, but does take Peters too siriusly, that guy is one injury from his career being done.I don't understand high an mighty on success at all. My playoff success in Shtickless and HR is basically nil. Maybe I do take TJ Peters too siriusly, but if the deal was between VD and r0b0t, I wouldn't care.if the exact same deal went thru with different coaches and you wouldnt care then vetoing this deal makes absolutely zero sense. who anointed you the caregiver for coaches who you feel need your special parenting? you already commish another league, feel free to be heavy handed and self-righteous there.
Posted by cbriese on 11/16/2010 11:59:00 AM (view original):Posted by vandydave on 11/16/2010 10:22:00 AM (view original):Posted by jwelsh1023 on 11/16/2010 10:17:00 AM (view original):Posted by AlCheez on 11/16/2010 10:08:00 AM (view original):VD won the deal, no question, but we've let worse go through without even a mention. Like I said, I get the veto, I just don't get why it came now. I think Briese takes TJ Peters too siriusly.In all honesty, I wouldn't have looked at it had briese not made a stink. But I didn't veto because of briese.this trade does not threaten the integrity of the league, nor is it a vet owner stealing from a noob owner. its two owners who traded probably 20+ offers back and forth before finding a deal. if we are going to veto deals where one team gets the better side in public opinion then probably 75% of deals need to be vetoed from here on out. and Briese has become high and mighty on his success, but does take Peters too siriusly, that guy is one injury from his career being done.I don't understand high an mighty on success at all. My playoff success in Shtickless and HR is basically nil. Maybe I do take TJ Peters too siriusly, but if the deal was between VD and r0b0t, I wouldn't care.
Posted by vandydave on 11/16/2010 10:22:00 AM (view original):Posted by jwelsh1023 on 11/16/2010 10:17:00 AM (view original):Posted by AlCheez on 11/16/2010 10:08:00 AM (view original):VD won the deal, no question, but we've let worse go through without even a mention. Like I said, I get the veto, I just don't get why it came now. I think Briese takes TJ Peters too siriusly.In all honesty, I wouldn't have looked at it had briese not made a stink. But I didn't veto because of briese.this trade does not threaten the integrity of the league, nor is it a vet owner stealing from a noob owner. its two owners who traded probably 20+ offers back and forth before finding a deal. if we are going to veto deals where one team gets the better side in public opinion then probably 75% of deals need to be vetoed from here on out. and Briese has become high and mighty on his success, but does take Peters too siriusly, that guy is one injury from his career being done.
Posted by jwelsh1023 on 11/16/2010 10:17:00 AM (view original):Posted by AlCheez on 11/16/2010 10:08:00 AM (view original):VD won the deal, no question, but we've let worse go through without even a mention. Like I said, I get the veto, I just don't get why it came now. I think Briese takes TJ Peters too siriusly.In all honesty, I wouldn't have looked at it had briese not made a stink. But I didn't veto because of briese.
Posted by AlCheez on 11/16/2010 10:08:00 AM (view original):VD won the deal, no question, but we've let worse go through without even a mention. Like I said, I get the veto, I just don't get why it came now. I think Briese takes TJ Peters too siriusly.
this trade does not threaten the integrity of the league, nor is it a vet owner stealing from a noob owner. its two owners who traded probably 20+ offers back and forth before finding a deal. if we are going to veto deals where one team gets the better side in public opinion then probably 75% of deals need to be vetoed from here on out. and Briese has become high and mighty on his success, but does take Peters too siriusly, that guy is one injury from his career being done.
Posted by cbriese on 11/16/2010 2:44:00 PM (view original):I win Startin' Somethin'.
Posted by r0b0t on 11/16/2010 1:59:00 PM (view original):I didn't think it was rape. For him to get $5m off the books would take some sweetener. But he could have shopped it around better.
Posted by jwelsh1023 on 11/16/2010 1:43:00 PM (view original):Dude, your trade got vetoed, it sucks, move on, and the next one will pass.
Posted by hugenuge42 on 11/16/2010 2:21:00 PM (view original):If you guys can't settle down and stop acting like a bunch of sandy vaged *****, I'm not sticking around. ****, moy has been on the sensible side of the street lately, and that isn't a good look for him.
Posted by vandydave on 11/16/2010 2:53:00 PM (view original):Posted by hugenuge42 on 11/16/2010 2:21:00 PM (view original):If you guys can't settle down and stop acting like a bunch of sandy vaged *****, I'm not sticking around. ****, moy has been on the sensible side of the street lately, and that isn't a good look for him.forcedretirement ball points...
Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement
© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.