Shtickless - Unless Being Dead Is A Shtick Topic

AlCheez
Posts: 3375 (0)
Hall of Famer
12 59 54
Pro
Posted by robusk on 12/1/2010 9:53:00 AM (view original):
Posted by AlCheez on 12/1/2010 9:41:00 AM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 12/1/2010 9:37:00 AM (view original):
Posted by dherz_263 on 12/1/2010 6:56:00 AM (view original):
Wallace will be really good, but I'm very pleased with Walters
Walters is really good.  I feel like the RP I got a few picks later will be nearly as good.
As will the guy I took right after you.
He second pitch is the only reason I had him a notch below.
Yeah, he was actually slotted right behind the guy you picked on my list, so I agree your guy is a bit better, but I was happy with getting either of them at 20.
12/1/2010 9:55 AM
dherz_263
Posts: 1179 (0)
Hall of Famer
11 3 2 64 5 145
Prospect
Posted by robusk on 12/1/2010 9:54:00 AM (view original):
Posted by dherz_263 on 12/1/2010 9:48:00 AM (view original):
Posted by AlCheez on 12/1/2010 9:41:00 AM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 12/1/2010 9:37:00 AM (view original):
Posted by dherz_263 on 12/1/2010 6:56:00 AM (view original):
Wallace will be really good, but I'm very pleased with Walters
Walters is really good.  I feel like the RP I got a few picks later will be nearly as good.
As will the guy I took right after you.
I'd prefer the guy you picked up over usk's indecisive pick
Indecisive?
As in he's undecided wether he wants to play baseball or not
12/1/2010 9:56 AM
dherz_263
Posts: 1179 (0)
Hall of Famer
11 3 2 64 5 145
Prospect
Now to wait and see what the international market has left.  After an initial rush of top talent, its been pretty barren most of the season     
12/1/2010 9:57 AM
cbriese
Posts: 919 (0)
Hall of Famer
765 102 201
Prospect
Awful draft for me. Could not see any decent HS players that went below #15.
12/1/2010 9:57 AM
robusk
Posts: 15375 (0)
Hall of Famer
26 489 20 90 77
All Star
Posted by dherz_263 on 12/1/2010 9:56:00 AM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 12/1/2010 9:54:00 AM (view original):
Posted by dherz_263 on 12/1/2010 9:48:00 AM (view original):
Posted by AlCheez on 12/1/2010 9:41:00 AM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 12/1/2010 9:37:00 AM (view original):
Posted by dherz_263 on 12/1/2010 6:56:00 AM (view original):
Wallace will be really good, but I'm very pleased with Walters
Walters is really good.  I feel like the RP I got a few picks later will be nearly as good.
As will the guy I took right after you.
I'd prefer the guy you picked up over usk's indecisive pick
Indecisive?
As in he's undecided wether he wants to play baseball or not
Oh...  I always side with talent in every draft.  That is how I steal guys like Briggs in HR and Ponson in KP.
12/1/2010 9:58 AM
robusk
Posts: 15375 (0)
Hall of Famer
26 489 20 90 77
All Star
Posted by AlCheez on 12/1/2010 9:55:00 AM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 12/1/2010 9:53:00 AM (view original):
Posted by AlCheez on 12/1/2010 9:41:00 AM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 12/1/2010 9:37:00 AM (view original):
Posted by dherz_263 on 12/1/2010 6:56:00 AM (view original):
Wallace will be really good, but I'm very pleased with Walters
Walters is really good.  I feel like the RP I got a few picks later will be nearly as good.
As will the guy I took right after you.
He second pitch is the only reason I had him a notch below.
Yeah, he was actually slotted right behind the guy you picked on my list, so I agree your guy is a bit better, but I was happy with getting either of them at 20.
I have a RP in HR with all three pitches in the 70's and he has been pretty money.
12/1/2010 9:58 AM
tylermathias
Posts: 3885 (0)
Hall of Famer
12 6 17 307 10 125
Prospect
Posted by robusk on 12/1/2010 9:52:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tylermathias on 12/1/2010 9:39:00 AM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 12/1/2010 9:31:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tylermathias on 11/30/2010 8:36:00 PM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 11/30/2010 4:54:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tylermathias on 11/30/2010 4:51:00 PM (view original):
I don't know, VD.  The 51's have the Robusk Seal of Awfulness, and your boys aren't matching up with them.
There are 8 decent to solid players on that team.

I probably overstepped.  Not awful, but certainly not good.
Was the 8 a legit count or an estimate.  If it was your real count I'm going to try and guess which 8.
Real count
Nice, I'll work on this later.
It should be fairly obvious.
My guess is I'll have 3 or 4 guys I have to pare down to the last two "decent to solid" spots.

Quick guess, because today is going to be a suckfest:

Foster, Kerr, Anderson, Franco, Sheets, Morgan, Huson, Rivera?
12/1/2010 10:00 AM
dherz_263
Posts: 1179 (0)
Hall of Famer
11 3 2 64 5 145
Prospect
First time I've not drafted a SS since season 12; when I had drafted 24 pitchers and 1 catcher
12/1/2010 10:01 AM
moy23
Posts: 13754 (0)
Hall of Famer
2 57 251 110
Prospect
With 0/0 scouting I don't know what I got until they sign.... but I'm betting they are losers.
12/1/2010 10:01 AM
AlCheez
Posts: 3375 (0)
Hall of Famer
12 59 54
Pro
Posted by robusk on 12/1/2010 9:58:00 AM (view original):
Posted by AlCheez on 12/1/2010 9:55:00 AM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 12/1/2010 9:53:00 AM (view original):
Posted by AlCheez on 12/1/2010 9:41:00 AM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 12/1/2010 9:37:00 AM (view original):
Posted by dherz_263 on 12/1/2010 6:56:00 AM (view original):
Wallace will be really good, but I'm very pleased with Walters
Walters is really good.  I feel like the RP I got a few picks later will be nearly as good.
As will the guy I took right after you.
He second pitch is the only reason I had him a notch below.
Yeah, he was actually slotted right behind the guy you picked on my list, so I agree your guy is a bit better, but I was happy with getting either of them at 20.
I have a RP in HR with all three pitches in the 70's and he has been pretty money.
I actually show Martin's 2nd in the high 60s and Maduro's in the low 60s.
12/1/2010 10:01 AM
dherz_263
Posts: 1179 (0)
Hall of Famer
11 3 2 64 5 145
Prospect
Posted by AlCheez on 12/1/2010 10:01:00 AM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 12/1/2010 9:58:00 AM (view original):
Posted by AlCheez on 12/1/2010 9:55:00 AM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 12/1/2010 9:53:00 AM (view original):
Posted by AlCheez on 12/1/2010 9:41:00 AM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 12/1/2010 9:37:00 AM (view original):
Posted by dherz_263 on 12/1/2010 6:56:00 AM (view original):
Wallace will be really good, but I'm very pleased with Walters
Walters is really good.  I feel like the RP I got a few picks later will be nearly as good.
As will the guy I took right after you.
He second pitch is the only reason I had him a notch below.
Yeah, he was actually slotted right behind the guy you picked on my list, so I agree your guy is a bit better, but I was happy with getting either of them at 20.
I have a RP in HR with all three pitches in the 70's and he has been pretty money.
I actually show Martin's 2nd in the high 60s and Maduro's in the low 60s.
I have their 2nd pitches at 69, and 66 respectively
12/1/2010 10:03 AM
winepimp
Posts: 89 (0)
Hall of Famer
66 1 66
Prospect
Posted by robusk on 12/1/2010 9:33:00 AM (view original):
Posted by AlCheez on 12/1/2010 6:16:00 AM (view original):
No kidding - how does Wallace slip to 12?
Retarded owners
i couldnt see him
12/1/2010 10:03 AM
robusk
Posts: 15375 (0)
Hall of Famer
26 489 20 90 77
All Star
Posted by tylermathias on 12/1/2010 10:00:00 AM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 12/1/2010 9:52:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tylermathias on 12/1/2010 9:39:00 AM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 12/1/2010 9:31:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tylermathias on 11/30/2010 8:36:00 PM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 11/30/2010 4:54:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tylermathias on 11/30/2010 4:51:00 PM (view original):
I don't know, VD.  The 51's have the Robusk Seal of Awfulness, and your boys aren't matching up with them.
There are 8 decent to solid players on that team.

I probably overstepped.  Not awful, but certainly not good.
Was the 8 a legit count or an estimate.  If it was your real count I'm going to try and guess which 8.
Real count
Nice, I'll work on this later.
It should be fairly obvious.
My guess is I'll have 3 or 4 guys I have to pare down to the last two "decent to solid" spots.

Quick guess, because today is going to be a suckfest:

Foster, Kerr, Anderson, Franco, Sheets, Morgan, Huson, Rivera?
7 out of 8.  Sheets sucks, Jennings is decent.
12/1/2010 10:05 AM
winepimp
Posts: 89 (0)
Hall of Famer
66 1 66
Prospect
for what i had in scouting, i'm pleased. especially the P i got at 50
12/1/2010 10:06 AM
robusk
Posts: 15375 (0)
Hall of Famer
26 489 20 90 77
All Star
Posted by AlCheez on 12/1/2010 10:01:00 AM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 12/1/2010 9:58:00 AM (view original):
Posted by AlCheez on 12/1/2010 9:55:00 AM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 12/1/2010 9:53:00 AM (view original):
Posted by AlCheez on 12/1/2010 9:41:00 AM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 12/1/2010 9:37:00 AM (view original):
Posted by dherz_263 on 12/1/2010 6:56:00 AM (view original):
Wallace will be really good, but I'm very pleased with Walters
Walters is really good.  I feel like the RP I got a few picks later will be nearly as good.
As will the guy I took right after you.
He second pitch is the only reason I had him a notch below.
Yeah, he was actually slotted right behind the guy you picked on my list, so I agree your guy is a bit better, but I was happy with getting either of them at 20.
I have a RP in HR with all three pitches in the 70's and he has been pretty money.
I actually show Martin's 2nd in the high 60s and Maduro's in the low 60s.
I have Maduro at 86/56 and Martin as 74/79/72.
12/1/2010 10:07 AM
â—‚ Prev 1...1247|1248|1249|1250|1251...1824 Next â–¸
Shtickless - Unless Being Dead Is A Shtick Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.