The argument against it was and still is that your hurt your lineup because it lost depth.  Not that the averages of your new 1-5 would not be better than your old 1-6.

Seriously, just because you are a ******* retard doesn't mean the rest of us are.  We are not swayed by your completely ridiculous numbers that tell us jack ****.

Posted by robusk on 12/10/2010 12:07:00 PM (view original):
The argument against it was and still is that your hurt your lineup because it lost depth.  Not that the averages of your new 1-5 would not be better than your old 1-6.

Seriously, just because you are a ******* retard doesn't mean the rest of us are.  We are not swayed by your completely ridiculous numbers that tell us jack ****.

I'm giving up depth for consistency. The same as I did when I acquired hartman. It ****** me off too much having brush in particular strikeout when the 3 before him did their job.

A more consistent lineup can produce more runs when less players are left on base.

Then don't have Brush hit fourth.

I did the numbers once already when the trade happened...  and like I said, you will lose runs.

Use your horrible intuition all you want.  This game runs on math and the math says you are an idiot.

Thank God stupid moy showed up today.  Shtickless has been dead since everyone got real jobs.

busk, if there's anyone in my ML bullpen that would interest you, let me know - looking for youth, obviously.

Yeah.  I looked.  There are two guys on your ML team that interest me...  the expensive guy and some dude in his late twenties.  I can't seem to make it work salary wise though.

heh, beat TM in HR 2-1 despite only having 1 hit

Also, my prospect situation has gotten weird.  I have two uber-studs and not much else.

Posted by robusk on 12/10/2010 12:39:00 PM (view original):
Yeah.  I looked.  There are two guys on your ML team that interest me...  the expensive guy and some dude in his late twenties.  I can't seem to make it work salary wise though.

Yeah - Covelski would be a problem given that you're maxed out - I could include cash to make a deal for the other guy work assuming I was getting something worthwhile back.

Posted by robusk on 12/10/2010 12:49:00 PM (view original):
Also, my prospect situation has gotten weird.  I have two uber-studs and not much else.

You're saying you wouldn't trade an uber-stud for an OK bullpen arm?

Strange...

Posted by AlCheez on 12/10/2010 12:49:00 PM (view original):

Posted by robusk on 12/10/2010 12:39:00 PM (view original):
Yeah.  I looked.  There are two guys on your ML team that interest me...  the expensive guy and some dude in his late twenties.  I can't seem to make it work salary wise though.

Yeah - Covelski would be a problem given that you're maxed out - I could include cash to make a deal for the other guy work assuming I was getting something worthwhile back.

Yeah.  It was Harris.  If you find something you want besides the big two, we can make it happen.

Posted by AlCheez on 12/10/2010 12:50:00 PM (view original):

Posted by robusk on 12/10/2010 12:49:00 PM (view original):
Also, my prospect situation has gotten weird.  I have two uber-studs and not much else.

You're saying you wouldn't trade an uber-stud for an OK bullpen arm?

Strange...

Weird was probably a poor word choice.  Difficult makes more sense.

I need me some weekend.

Classy as ****:
newsok.com/coach-to-face-filming-claims/article/3522035

Posted by robusk on 12/10/2010 12:24:00 PM (view original):
Thank God stupid moy showed up today.  Shtickless has been dead since everyone got real jobs.

I try where I can