Shtickless - Unless Being Dead Is A Shtick Topic

This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Show
moy23
Posts: 13754 (0)
Hall of Famer
2 57 251 110
Prospect
Posted by AlCheez on 1/9/2011 9:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by moy23 on 1/9/2011 8:31:00 PM (view original):
I think I may trade my Catcher Chavez for a SP3 
Is your goal to miss the playoffs entirely?
Yep
1/9/2011 10:10 PM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Show
r0b0t
Posts: 3048 (0)
Hall of Famer
8 3 5 2 35 133
Prospect
TM is going to wait for the jobs to come to him.
1/10/2011 8:56 AM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Show
bret2775
Posts: 1641 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 137 78
Prospect
bot- you around still?
1/10/2011 9:10 AM
r0b0t
Posts: 3048 (0)
Hall of Famer
8 3 5 2 35 133
Prospect
Yes
1/10/2011 9:54 AM
bret2775
Posts: 1641 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 137 78
Prospect
what do you think of my first two picks in DM?
1/10/2011 10:22 AM
r0b0t
Posts: 3048 (0)
Hall of Famer
8 3 5 2 35 133
Prospect
Not bad for where you picked them. They're both a little limited defensively and might be fighting for the same LF spot, but they're not bad. The first guy has very nice vL/vR against a subpar contact/power. Should be an interesting case study on the effectiveness of each.
1/10/2011 10:36 AM
r0b0t
Posts: 3048 (0)
Hall of Famer
8 3 5 2 35 133
Prospect
General & Fielding Ratings
Event Season Height Weight OV RA GL AS AA PC DU HE SP PA TP MK
Current - 6-1 175 65 68 52 43 43 11 70 73 70 51 44 63
Projected - 6-1 176 86 80 77 52 62 16 85 86 70 70 44 68
Batting & Pitching Ratings
Event Season CN PW LH RH BE BR BU PP ST CT LH RH VE GB P1 P2 P3 P4 P5
Current - 81 36 71 74 55 56 63 28 18 11 6 8 8 19 49 0 0 0 0
Projected - 100 45 92 89 69 71 75 30 21 16 9 12 11 23 57 0 0 0 0


Would you rather have this guy or the one I actually picked and posted a little higher on this page?
1/10/2011 10:42 AM
antonsirius
Posts: 2567 (0)
Hall of Famer
167 135 9 20
Prospect
I probably would have gone with the second guy, just because of the DUR concerns. But they should both be studs.
1/10/2011 11:16 AM
r0b0t
Posts: 3048 (0)
Hall of Famer
8 3 5 2 35 133
Prospect
The projected durability is only five points apart, with better health.

Ages are 18 and 20, respectively.
1/10/2011 11:27 AM
vandydave
Posts: 2124 (0)
Hall of Famer
28 1 1 843 270
Prospect
i am satisfied with my pick at #20 but not thrilled, his stamina and vsL both went down from what i saw
1/10/2011 11:28 AM
antonsirius
Posts: 2567 (0)
Hall of Famer
167 135 9 20
Prospect
Posted by r0b0t on 1/10/2011 11:27:00 AM (view original):
The projected durability is only five points apart, with better health.

Ages are 18 and 20, respectively.
He's starting at 48, he'll never reach that projection. You might get him to 70 - which is still playable in the majors, but he'll lose at bats and/or effectiveness. Plus, you'll have a couple of seasons in the minors where the low DUR affects his playing time enough to cut into his development a bit.
1/10/2011 12:06 PM
vandydave
Posts: 2124 (0)
Hall of Famer
28 1 1 843 270
Prospect
moy - tc
1/10/2011 12:15 PM
â—‚ Prev 1...1325|1326|1327|1328|1329...1824 Next â–¸
Shtickless - Unless Being Dead Is A Shtick Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.