Who is violent...Left or right?? Topic

Posted by antonsirius on 3/6/2011 10:46:00 AM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 3/3/2011 12:54:00 PM (view original):
Too bad you don't understand some of the words in the English language.   I assume you recall typing this:

"- the violent left-wing rhetoric, on the other hand, is predominantly aimed at Wall Street. So if anyone were fueled/inspired by such rhetoric, their targets would largely be financial figures: bankers, brokers, traders, accountants etc."

So do you not understand "implication" or "violent"?



I do. You clearly don't - or rather, you don't care, just so long as you can seize any flimsy excuse to stir up **** in a thread.
In that case, please tell us what you were attempting to say.
3/6/2011 5:08 PM
Wed. is the first day of lent and I have come to the conclusion that if I give up reading swamp for lent and the quick laughs that go with it that i will be doing a good thing for my soul. All that and pepper and egg sandwiches! It gets no better then that!
3/7/2011 12:13 PM
1 Lent is for giving up somethng you like. You dont like me, I drive you nuts. And not matter how much you get fired up by our little feud, you cannot change that. You should actually give up the right to ignore me for lent. Respond to every post of mine you can find.

2 What kind of pepper and how do you prepare the eggs?
3/7/2011 2:47 PM
Posted by swamphawk22 on 4/1/2011 5:42:00 PM (view original):
No actually your opinion on the subject is worthless. I asked you to explain why saying that Bush is responsible for the deaths of soldiers because he lied isnt the same as the things Rush has said and you have NEVER explained why it is different.

This is your chance to actually stand for something.

What is the difference?
Waiting for response from Anton.

I will not hold my breath. I realize Anton cannot defend any of his beliefs, or even explain them!
4/1/2011 5:43 PM
I have explained that to you, a few times actually. And you ignored what I said and kept right on mischaracterizing what I said and spewing your usual bullshit.
 
I won't waste my time any more typing things you have no intention of reading.
4/1/2011 6:26 PM
Posted by swamphawk22 on 4/1/2011 5:43:00 PM (view original):
Posted by swamphawk22 on 4/1/2011 5:42:00 PM (view original):
No actually your opinion on the subject is worthless. I asked you to explain why saying that Bush is responsible for the deaths of soldiers because he lied isnt the same as the things Rush has said and you have NEVER explained why it is different.

This is your chance to actually stand for something.

What is the difference?
Waiting for response from Anton.

I will not hold my breath. I realize Anton cannot defend any of his beliefs, or even explain them!
No, no, no. Please hold your breath until you pass out. When you wake up, report back here about whether dragons exist and if they are part of a conspiracy to discredit Fox News.

Not only will this be wildly entertaining, it would also set a baseline for what I'm going to call the "Beck" control group for a study on brain trauma. Now I'll just need to find a defensive tackle willing to play without a helmet for an entire NFL season and a meth addict and I'll be ready to apply for federal funding.
4/1/2011 7:03 PM
Posted by antonsirius on 4/1/2011 6:26:00 PM (view original):
I have explained that to you, a few times actually. And you ignored what I said and kept right on mischaracterizing what I said and spewing your usual bullshit.
 
I won't waste my time any more typing things you have no intention of reading.
This isnt accurate. All you did was say that my analysis of you was wrong.

You never state anything about your position. You never take a stand, other than to attack others.


4/2/2011 8:09 PM
This very thread demonstrates that you just lied, swamp.

You really need to stay away from text-based mediums. Your pathetic bullshit isn't designed for them.
4/2/2011 8:39 PM

The truth is always the truth. You never explained why there is a difference between the two. Ever.

You made some comments that they are different and that I was an idiot for bringing it up, but you never explained a difference.

4/2/2011 10:14 PM
And you might want to look up lie in a dictionary!
4/2/2011 10:14 PM
And now we're back to the sputtering incoherence. Sweet.
4/2/2011 11:55 PM
Posted by antonsirius on 4/2/2011 11:55:00 PM (view original):
And now we're back to the sputtering incoherence. Sweet.
You often accuse me of being a liar. It is my pusition that even if you are right about the issue, what I did would not be lying.

So I want you to look up lying because as the line in the movie goes..."You keep using that word, I do not thing it means what you think it means".


4/3/2011 5:08 AM
Posted by antonsirius on 4/2/2011 11:55:00 PM (view original):
And now we're back to the sputtering incoherence. Sweet.
Or if you are refering to the first comment you never actually respond. You never stated why the things said about Bush are different than anything Rush ever said.

Pick a Rush line and tell me why it would promote violence more than the anti-Bush line. Or why the 2 are so very different.

For once drop the ironic detachment and talk like we were 2 guys at a water cooler.
4/3/2011 5:13 AM
Posted by swamphawk22 on 4/3/2011 5:08:00 AM (view original):
Posted by antonsirius on 4/2/2011 11:55:00 PM (view original):
And now we're back to the sputtering incoherence. Sweet.
You often accuse me of being a liar. It is my pusition that even if you are right about the issue, what I did would not be lying.

So I want you to look up lying because as the line in the movie goes..."You keep using that word, I do not thing it means what you think it means".


Sigh. Fine. It is apparently my curse to try and educate fools who do not wish to learn. A lie, according to Merriam-Webster, is:

a : an assertion of something known or believed by the speaker to be untrue with intent to deceive

b : an untrue or inaccurate statement that may or may not be believed true by the speaker



I've bolded the relevant bits.


In this particular instance, I called your statement
Posted by swamphawk22 on 4/2/2011 8:09:00 PM:
You never state anything about your position. You never take a stand, other than to attack others.

a lie since in this very thread I do the things you just said I never do.

You say this lie in the hopes of discrediting me with whoever might happen to come along and read this thread (that's your intent to deceive, up above), since pretty much everything you do in these political threads is an attempt at proselytization. You have admitted such many times - unlike the rest of us, who just have political conversations to pass the time, find out things about people we're sharing virtual space with etc., you have political conversations in the mad belief that you must 'spread the word' and convince people of the rightness and righteousness of your cause.

When you say something untrue as a form of political spin, or as an attack on someone you've deemed an opponent, it is a lie. Whether you genuinely believe it or not doesn't change that fact.
4/3/2011 8:06 AM
I stand by what I say. You never defend your statements. You never follow up on issues. You make a statement and that is it.

You dont really take a stand. You are just against things.

And the idea that being wrong about something is lying is out there. I guess you really can find anything on the internet.
4/3/2011 3:49 PM
◂ Prev 12345 Next ▸
Who is violent...Left or right?? Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.