Man, why do I keep coming back here?


....circling again....

Posted by antonsirius on 6/8/2011 7:58:00 AM (view original):
You're lying. **** off.

Very typical for Anton. He uses some obscure reference and when someone responds to it in the form that average Americans talk he claims that the never said that. So you ask him what he meant and he insults you and runs away like a 4th grader.

Posted by silentpadna on 6/8/2011 2:47:00 PM (view original):
Man, why do I keep coming back here?


....circling again....

I'm deliberately keeping these two threads going to keep this crap out of threads that might contain something interesting to anyone else. Feel free to ignore this train wreck, I won't take it personally.

Posted by swamphawk22 on 6/8/2011 4:35:00 PM (view original):

Posted by antonsirius on 6/8/2011 7:58:00 AM (view original):
You're lying. **** off.

Very typical for Anton. He uses some obscure reference and when someone responds to it in the form that average Americans talk he claims that the never said that. So you ask him what he meant and he insults you and runs away like a 4th grader.

There was nothing at all obscure about what I said, and I haven't gone anywhere. Two more lies from your poison keyboard.

And I have siad that this thread is special.

You need this. Your whole web of Swamp Mythology is all tied up in this.

"Mythology" implies that it's not true, which it clearly is. One more lie from you.

Two, actually, if you include the "you need this" part, but I'll be charitable and chalk that up to trash talk. Weak-*** trash talk, but still.

Responding in order to the last 3 Anton threads....

1 The claim that you are doing this as a favor is very wrong. Since you are keeping it alive it will die without you. You are keeping this alive for your benefit. You think that you finally have something to attack me with.

2 I know a cocktail party elitest, woops I mean someone who always acts like a cocktail party elitest, may not grasp this but Korzybyski is very obscure.

3 Mythology does not have to imply 100% not true. It can include elements of truth that support a bigger myth. Thats you. And it is clear you do need this. I let it drop for a few days and you jumped right back up to reignite the flame.

In the end this is a long discussion (or 2-3 long discussions) about almost nothing. It is clear that I am not a racist but you need to keep it alive for political gain.

1 swamp, I have volumes of stuff to attack you with if that's what I wanted to do.

2 Wrong thread, idiot.

3 Link to your bullshit definition of "mythology", please.

1 You claim to but it always dies quick. There is no depth to your attacks. They are always based on the oddest tangent possible. Its like someone asks you to pick a number between 1-10 and you say 7.1315876. Technically accurate but missing the point.

2 It is an example of a very obscure reference that you claim is the key to Western Civilization.

3 http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/myth

1 More lies. What else is new. I always back up my what I say with more than just my own opinion.

2 More lies. What else is new. Your reference to my "obscure statement" in this thread had absolutely nothing to do with the conversation in the other thread. You were made to look like an idiot here, and now you're doubling down on it rather than just walking away like you normally do.

3 So either you consider yourself a god (or at least a demi-god) as per definitions 1 & 2, or you're admitting you were trying to imply that I was fabricating something as per definition 3. Nice work.

1 You accused me of being a liar. That is original. Same old tired crap.

2 Your depths of obscurity know no bounds. It does get confusing. So what insignificant pieve of nothing am I destroying here?

3 I consider myself a being with a determinable basis in fact. For a guy that complains about me reading you picked the parts that made you appear right and ignored everything else. Are you sure English is your first language?

1 If you keep lying, I'll keep calling you a liar. Do you want me to start finding synonyms?

2 That was completely incoherent. Try again.

3 I didn't pick any parts at all. I used all three definitions of 'myth' that you provided. When you said how I described you was a mythology, did you mean definitions 1 or 2 (in which case you think you are divine) or 3 (in which case you were implying everything I say about you is a total fabrication)?

I'm beginning to see why you avoid providing links to things. Links to actually back up your assertions don't exist, so you can either not provide a link or provide one and hope no one clicks it.

ncsl

Here is a great example of why you are nuts.

This is cut and pasted from the link...a traditional or legendary story, usually concerning some being or hero or event, with or without a determinable basis of fact or a natural explanation, especially one that is concerned with deities or demigods and explains some practice, rite, or phenomenon of nature

Read the parts in Red.

Or let me sum up. A legend can be based in some fact, and does not have to be about a demi-god.

So for those of you who have lost track of Anton's insanity I am right and he is wrong.

So now you're picking and choosing which parts of the definition you want to use, and which you don't. Exactly what you claimed I just did.