Obama: Worst President Ever? Topic

Posted by jrd_x on 6/4/2012 12:58:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 6/4/2012 11:28:00 AM (view original):
Because they are not my personal traditions.  They are traditions that have been established by humanity as a whole over thousands of years of civilization.
And remind me again what the big problem is if the tradition changes to include an additional 3% of the population?

Why should long-standing historical and cultural traditions should be cast aside because a small special-interest group of people demand it?
 

6/4/2012 2:16 PM
Seems to me that the traditions aren't being cast aside.  More people are just being included.
6/4/2012 2:32 PM
Well if tradition says that something is "X", and you are now saying that "it's not X, it's Y", then you have cast aside the traditional definition and replaced it with something different.
6/4/2012 2:36 PM
Tradition was X, now it's X + Y.  Everyone under X still gets their tradition.  Everyone under Y can be included too if they want.

Seems like the best solution.  
6/4/2012 2:38 PM
Except it's not X + Y.  It's now Y.
6/4/2012 2:40 PM
Are straight people no longer allowed to marry?
6/4/2012 2:42 PM
That's not the point.  The point is that you've redefined marriage to be something that it traditionally has never been, merely to placate a small special interest group and for no other reason.  You've cast thousands of years of human culture and social norms aside.
6/4/2012 3:19 PM
Nothing is being cast aside. Straight people are still able to marry. Now, gay people are too.
6/4/2012 3:21 PM
One man, one woman.
6/4/2012 3:35 PM
Posted by jrd_x on 6/4/2012 1:38:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 6/4/2012 1:35:00 PM (view original):
Posted by jrd_x on 6/4/2012 1:29:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 6/4/2012 1:19:00 PM (view original):
1.  So you agree that this is a false statement?  "If a gay person remains single, they will still need health care."  

The increased cost comes with being added to a spouse's company insurance.

2.  I think it will.  You seemed to think that drug use and/or suicide would not.   Remember?  I called you a moron for your mentally deficient stance on legalizing both on the grounds that it doesn't affect anyone else.

1. Last I checked there is no "free coverage for spouses" from insurance companies.  They still charge premium.  It's up to the employer to decide how much of the cost they choose to pay for spousal coverage.

There is nothing false about the statement.  Everyone in their lifetime will need health care of some sort.  Everybody gets sick.

2.  I said suicide should be legal without commenting on its affect on others.  You made the argument that it affects others.  I agree it does affect others and is therefore not analogous to gay marriage.
1.  Try getting independent health coverage.  Compare the cost of being added to your spouse's company coverage and get back to me.

Maybe.  But the guy with no insurance will be responsible for his visits out of pocket.

2.   Then why were you for legalizing suicide?
1.  Yes, for two reasons.  You're getting a group rate and it is often subsidized by the employer.

2. Because I think terminally ill people should be able to end their life when they are in pain.
1.  So you agree that healthcare costs would go up because the gay spouse has coverage from his significant other's employer?

2.  If you successfully kill yourself, I don't think it matters if it's legal or not.    It's those who suck at suicide who need to be discouraged from trying it.
6/4/2012 3:39 PM
Methinks somebody needs to look up "tradition".
6/4/2012 3:40 PM
Posted by tecwrg on 6/4/2012 3:35:00 PM (view original):
One man, one woman.
...can still get married.
6/4/2012 3:44 PM
Posted by MikeT23 on 6/4/2012 3:40:00 PM (view original):
Methinks somebody needs to look up "tradition".
Or at least stop spitting in it's face.
6/4/2012 3:51 PM
Posted by MikeT23 on 6/4/2012 3:40:00 PM (view original):
Posted by jrd_x on 6/4/2012 1:38:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 6/4/2012 1:35:00 PM (view original):
Posted by jrd_x on 6/4/2012 1:29:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 6/4/2012 1:19:00 PM (view original):
1.  So you agree that this is a false statement?  "If a gay person remains single, they will still need health care."  

The increased cost comes with being added to a spouse's company insurance.

2.  I think it will.  You seemed to think that drug use and/or suicide would not.   Remember?  I called you a moron for your mentally deficient stance on legalizing both on the grounds that it doesn't affect anyone else.

1. Last I checked there is no "free coverage for spouses" from insurance companies.  They still charge premium.  It's up to the employer to decide how much of the cost they choose to pay for spousal coverage.

There is nothing false about the statement.  Everyone in their lifetime will need health care of some sort.  Everybody gets sick.

2.  I said suicide should be legal without commenting on its affect on others.  You made the argument that it affects others.  I agree it does affect others and is therefore not analogous to gay marriage.
1.  Try getting independent health coverage.  Compare the cost of being added to your spouse's company coverage and get back to me.

Maybe.  But the guy with no insurance will be responsible for his visits out of pocket.

2.   Then why were you for legalizing suicide?
1.  Yes, for two reasons.  You're getting a group rate and it is often subsidized by the employer.

2. Because I think terminally ill people should be able to end their life when they are in pain.
1.  So you agree that healthcare costs would go up because the gay spouse has coverage from his significant other's employer?

2.  If you successfully kill yourself, I don't think it matters if it's legal or not.    It's those who suck at suicide who need to be discouraged from trying it.
1. Why would healthcare costs go up because someone is married?

2.  You brought up suicide.  Do I need to show you the link?

mike: suicide doesn't affect anyone
me: I'm ok with legalizing suicide
mike: what??? legalizing suicide will result in taxpayers taking care of people who try and fail
me: um, ok. I guess it does affect others and isn't relevant to the gay marriage discussion.


6/4/2012 3:52 PM
Here:

Definition of TRADITION

1
a : an inherited, established, or customary pattern of thought, action, or behavior (as a religious practice or a social custom) b : a belief or story or a body of beliefs or stories relating to the past that are commonly accepted as historical though not verifiable
2
: the handing down of information, beliefs, and customs by word of mouth or by example from one generation to another without written instruction
3
: cultural continuity in social attitudes, customs, and institutions
4
: characteristic manner, method, or style <in the best liberal tradition>
6/4/2012 3:53 PM
◂ Prev 1...92|93|94|95|96...462 Next ▸
Obama: Worst President Ever? Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.