Question was raised in one of my world CC (by me), but thought I'd take here to get the general opinion and should WIS do anything about it?
It appears that the way service time is set up, you can call up a guy 20 games into the minor league season to avoid a full season of service time. No problems there. So lets say a guy burns his 1st option using his 20 days in the minors, then spends all of the next season in the majors to accumulate 1 full season of service time. Now in season 3, he's optioned down to the minors prior to ST to avoid a demotion penalty, spends 20 games down there, and is recalled to the majors for the rest of the year. Since he spent less than 172 days (or what ever the number is) in the majors, he doesn't accure a 2nd full season of service time. He spends the whole next season (essentially his 4th) in the majors and at the end has only 2 seasons of service time showing up. The following 2 seasons he repeats the process w/ his last option and has spent 6 years in the majors before hitting arbitration. Now that he's out of options, he spends the next 2 years getting his demands, then is signed to a 5 year deal. So if he starts the process when he's 22, he'll be under your control, and for cheaper than he'd make on the open market (if you do it w/ an all-star caliber player) until he's 35, at which point he's more likely to resign with you w/o testing the market.
Am I right in that reasoning? If so, you could control a guy for his entire career, w/o him every hitting the market, and seems like it would be bad for the overall health of a world. If everyone did it, you'd never see a decent max contract worth free agent.