Posted by rc1990 on 8/12/2010 2:10:00 PM (view original):
And why would that be? People can't answer a simple question?
Your world's out of whack, with more more teams that either win 90 or more games or lose 90 or more games. For S16, when Tucson won 124 games, I found that the outlier for most HBD leagues (and MLB history) made up the majority of teams in
Eckersley:
100+ wins or 100+ losses: 6 teams (1 with 120+ wins and 2 with 110+ losses)
90+ wins or 90+ losses: 12 teams (5 with losing records)
Between 90-86 wins and 90-86 losses: 7 teams (6 with losing records)
Between 85 wins and 85 losses: 7 teams (1 with losing record)
Quite simply, there are a lot of really good teams and a lot of really bad teams, with relatively few hovering around .500. There were 17 teams with winning records and 15 with losing records, including seven that lost 90 or more games. Five of those seven teams were in your league.
From the looks of things, your team was feasting on some seriously bad teams.