hehe.

Posted by pstrnutbag44 on 9/10/2011 12:31:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 9/10/2011 11:58:00 AM (view original):

I wouldn't have called it a manifesto.  It was more like a drama queen calling attention to herself making a big noisy exit.

Curious tec, what's your problem anyways? Nothing I say is directed at you, I ignore you in general.....yet you feel a need to try and talk down on and to me like that (and also make sure to quote my posts for your pal Mike to jump in....even though he has me blocked. You two show such shameful behavior for adults). Sad, really. You have no purpose. I mean, what you say and how you treat some of the people around here is borderline sociopathic. Why bother? Aren't you here to play a game and have fun? Is ******* with people how you get your fun? You realize what they call that, right?

 

Edit: If it's for attention tec, why didn;t I start my own thread? Your BS assumptions don't even make sense.  Maybe it's time you thought long and hard about  how apparently distorted your perspective is (leading you to poor and false conclusions, which are mere assumptions that make you look foolish), or about how you go around the forums, getting your jollies by verbally putting others down. Either way, I'm sure you feel good about it. I'm sure it serves some purpose, or you wouldn't do it, right? Look all that up in a fancy learnin' book, and grasp what that concept is. They have a specific term for it.

Seriously, I don't have a problem with you.  I was responding to the content of your post, not the fact that you posted it.  In fact, I didn't even remember that we had some sort of "run in" before you even brought it up.  I don't even remember what that was.

And I stand by my response.  You come across as hypocritical when you get all pissy towards WIS while still purchasing their products.  Your subsequent responses were more drama queen.

Regardless of what you like to represent, tec, you hound me anytime I get on Mike's case and prove him wrong (of which there is AMPLE evidence of using the search function in the forums. The forum search is a handy tool.) Whatever your excuse is Tec, you've constantly followed me around and bickered AT me, even though the only time I ever adressed you personally before that was in general, as a group of solid users, that I referred to as "cats". You took immediate offense and have been a ***** since. Look above. You acuse me of hypocrisy? Look at your own posts. What about your Wah-Wah session when they wouldn't answer your ticket?

Cut the ****, Tec. It's transparent. I assume you are reasonably intelligent and mature enough to see that, if you can step outside your own POV and obtain some perspective.

Or how about when I tried to discuss at length the screwy numbers w/regards to SB and how catchers will fluctuate wildly due to the engine trying to meet a specific percentage of CS? Then, months after dismissing me for a loon, you post an EXACT EXAMPLE OF WHAT I WAS TALKING ABOUT and asked WTF?

 

Get real, man. You've got a chip on your shoulder, whether or not you care to acknowledge it (or why, for that matter).

Dude, you're insane...

Posted by genghisxcon on 9/10/2011 4:58:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 3/14/2011 2:22:00 PM:

 

There has not been an HBD Developer's Chat in over 16 months (since 11/9/2009).

There has not been an update to the game in four months (since 11/15/2010).

I can't remember the last time SiteStaff commented on anything in the HBD Suggestions Forum.

I can't remember the last time we've seen any posts from tzentmeyer or patrickm885 in the general HBD forum about anything.

There's a general perception that Customer Support (i.e. responding to tickets) is at an all-time low (so far).

So . . . is this game dying?  Will we all login to the site some day to find that it's just not here anymore?






Posted by tecwrg on 9/10/2011 4:45:00 PM:


You come across as hypocritical when you get all pissy towards WIS while still purchasing their products.

Five statements of fact, followed by two questions.  No posturing.  No drama.  No indignation.

Surely you can tell the difference?

Tec, look again. You are indeed getting a bit forceful with the underlining (in English, especially via internet, this does imply something, no? Or you wouldn't place emphasis on it), etc. if this is all about splitting hairs now. Truth is, you did plenty of ********. That's where your hypocrisy lies. Own it. I am not posturing, I am stating exactly what I am doing and following through. Look up posturing, as you appear to be confused as to it's meaning (again, if you want to get all semantic).

Mine is a series of statements as well. Mine has no threats, is not posturing and simply is but a clear outline of exactly what I am doing and why. Your prejudices and presumptions make it what you want it to be from there.

Posted by pstrnutbag44 on 9/10/2011 5:48:00 PM (view original):
Regardless of what you like to represent, tec, you hound me anytime I get on Mike's case and prove him wrong (of which there is AMPLE evidence of using the search function in the forums. The forum search is a handy tool.) Whatever your excuse is Tec, you've constantly followed me around and bickered AT me, even though the only time I ever adressed you personally before that was in general, as a group of solid users, that I referred to as "cats". You took immediate offense and have been a ***** since. Look above. You acuse me of hypocrisy? Look at your own posts. What about your Wah-Wah session when they wouldn't answer your ticket?

Cut the ****, Tec. It's transparent. I assume you are reasonably intelligent and mature enough to see that, if you can step outside your own POV and obtain some perspective.

Wow.  You've got quite the persecution complex.

I do not have some sort of "hate list" of users.  I don't.  Really.  If I've attacked something you've said, then it's just that . . . something you said, and not you.  If I have subsequently attacked you, it's because you somehow made it personal.  Because I don't roll that way.  I'm a little more mature than that.  I don't get my jollies from gratuitously attacking people for no reason.

Posted by pstrnutbag44 on 9/10/2011 7:14:00 PM (view original):

Tec, look again. You are indeed getting a bit forceful with the underlining (in English, especially via internet, this does imply something, no? Or you wouldn't place emphasis on it), etc. if this is all about splitting hairs now. Truth is, you did plenty of ********. That's where your hypocrisy lies. Own it. I am not posturing, I am stating exactly what I am doing and following through. Look up posturing, as you appear to be confused as to it's meaning (again, if you want to get all semantic).

Mine is a series of statements as well. Mine has no threats, is not posturing and simply is but a clear outline of exactly what I am doing and why. Your prejudices and presumptions make it what you want it to be from there.

Uh, sure.  I'll just let your post stand for itself.  Let other's decide who's posturing and playing the drama queen, and who's not.

Posted by deathinahole on 9/9/2011 10:16:00 PM (view original):

pstrnutcase is always a good read.

and continues to be

Posted by tecwrg on 9/10/2011 7:29:00 PM (view original):

Posted by pstrnutbag44 on 9/10/2011 5:48:00 PM (view original):
Regardless of what you like to represent, tec, you hound me anytime I get on Mike's case and prove him wrong (of which there is AMPLE evidence of using the search function in the forums. The forum search is a handy tool.) Whatever your excuse is Tec, you've constantly followed me around and bickered AT me, even though the only time I ever adressed you personally before that was in general, as a group of solid users, that I referred to as "cats". You took immediate offense and have been a ***** since. Look above. You acuse me of hypocrisy? Look at your own posts. What about your Wah-Wah session when they wouldn't answer your ticket?

Cut the ****, Tec. It's transparent. I assume you are reasonably intelligent and mature enough to see that, if you can step outside your own POV and obtain some perspective.

Wow.  You've got quite the persecution complex.

I do not have some sort of "hate list" of users.  I don't.  Really.  If I've attacked something you've said, then it's just that . . . something you said, and not you.  If I have subsequently attacked you, it's because you somehow made it personal.  Because I don't roll that way.  I'm a little more mature than that.  I don't get my jollies from gratuitously attacking people for no reason.

If that last part of that statement holds true, then why did you used to follow posters around the old suggestions forum and belittle them to no end? You are either being dishonest with me, yourself, or both. Sorry.

Unless you can truthfully state you've never belittled anyone on here. Of course I'm sure you believe it's justifiable if they say something you don't agree with/like, but it's all the same Tec. You're almost as bad as Mike when it comes to belittling users for a perceived lack of intelligence. Wise men help, not belittle, those they feel need guidance. They certainly never treat others as if they are somhow beneath them.

Or, a simpler question. You disagree with my post. Fair enough. What makes you feel the need to insult and call names, if you're "a little more mature than that"?

Posted by tecwrg on 9/10/2011 7:29:00 PM (view original):

Posted by pstrnutbag44 on 9/10/2011 5:48:00 PM (view original):
Regardless of what you like to represent, tec, you hound me anytime I get on Mike's case and prove him wrong (of which there is AMPLE evidence of using the search function in the forums. The forum search is a handy tool.) Whatever your excuse is Tec, you've constantly followed me around and bickered AT me, even though the only time I ever adressed you personally before that was in general, as a group of solid users, that I referred to as "cats". You took immediate offense and have been a ***** since. Look above. You acuse me of hypocrisy? Look at your own posts. What about your Wah-Wah session when they wouldn't answer your ticket?

Cut the ****, Tec. It's transparent. I assume you are reasonably intelligent and mature enough to see that, if you can step outside your own POV and obtain some perspective.

Wow.  You've got quite the persecution complex.

I do not have some sort of "hate list" of users.  I don't.  Really.  If I've attacked something you've said, then it's just that . . . something you said, and not you.  If I have subsequently attacked you, it's because you somehow made it personal.  Because I don't roll that way.  I'm a little more mature than that.  I don't get my jollies from gratuitously attacking people for no reason.

Yep, That's part of the reason I blocked him.   There was a time when his only postings were to/about me.   Good to know, since I blocked him, he's found another user to claim "persecutes" him without cause.

When did I follow anybody around the forums to belittle them?  Maybe you have me confused with somebody else.