Posted by burnsy483 on 9/18/2011 11:10:00 AM (view original):
Real life example. I'm painting a bedroom today. Let's say I buy the paint from a store with a strict "no return" policy on paints. I want a green paint, quickly pick one out, buy it, and paint a wall in my room. I realize I hate the color. It's green, but its nothing like I expected. I take the rest of the paint back, demand that they take it back and give me a new can of a different green. The store reminds me of the strict "no return" policy on paint, but they are gracious enough to add some other colors to the partially used paint to try to fit my needs. I call bullshit and refuse to ever go to the store again. Even though I bought the paint without really seeing if I liked it, without buying a sample and testing it on my wall first, and knowing that the store rarely makes exceptions to their strict rules. Who is out of line in this situation? Me, or the store?
I applaud your attempt, but I dont think this quite applies.
Where in your story is the person that intentionally screwed up the team?
There are nuances and elements to my situation that doesnt correlate to your example in the least. Obviously in your example the store has no obligation.
And I understand that WIS has a policy, but obviously they are willing to break policy as they did with this contract. They have set a precedent here. But the truth is (unquestionably) that this contract was deliberatly made to undermine both this team and the world. There can be no arguing this point everybody in the world admits this is absolutely true MikeT included. And especially so Tecwrg (the commish).
So for the last time and I mean the last time why shouldnt a contract like this be automatically recinded regardless of any other extenuating circumstances. (like the fact that I took the team before I asked CS to rectify it)