LP guard vs. Per Guard Topic

tkimble
Posts: 1347 (0)
Hall of Famer
2 335 1 1
Rookie
  A B
Ath 65 50
Spd 80 65
Def 60 55
LP 40 1
Per 45 80
BH 65 70
P 65 85

This is for div 2...Would you take A for the ATH, SPD, and LP despite the big disadvantages in PER and PAS?
8/9/2010 9:05 PM
reinsel
Posts: 927 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 130
Rookie
yes.  especially if A can rebound.
8/9/2010 10:00 PM
tkimble
Posts: 1347 (0)
Hall of Famer
2 335 1 1
Rookie
Neither of these guys can rebound.
8/9/2010 10:05 PM
brianp87
Posts: 1340 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 46 89
Prospect
depends on there pot and iq.  are they both fr?
8/9/2010 11:23 PM
tkimble
Posts: 1347 (0)
Hall of Famer
2 335 1 1
Rookie
this is what they will become...both will max out...both know my defense coming in.  
8/9/2010 11:26 PM
bhansalid00
Posts: 713 (0)
Hall of Famer
109 204 8 1
Prospect
If B has high potential for SPD (or if A has low potential for SPD), I'd take B. If their SPD were equal, to me, B's advantages in PER and PAS are more important than A's ATH. But if A is going to keep having a 15-pt SPD advantage the next 4 yrs, then yeah, I would take him.
8/9/2010 11:26 PM
tianyi7886
Posts: 4243 (0)
Hall of Famer
51 33 282 40
Prospect
Posted by tkimble on 8/9/2010 11:26:00 PM (view original):
this is what they will become...both will max out...both know my defense coming in.  
If this is what they will look like once they max out, then I like A.
8/10/2010 12:26 AM
trobone
Posts: 615 (0)
Hall of Famer
73 12 10
Rookie
can't you take both - and play A at SF some of the time?
8/10/2010 2:12 AM
brip87
Posts: 421 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1
Prospect
I would find another option that was better.  they would be ok if he had rebounding at 30 +
8/10/2010 9:11 AM
tkimble
Posts: 1347 (0)
Hall of Famer
2 335 1 1
Rookie
Posted by brip87 on 8/10/2010 9:11:00 AM (view original):
I would find another option that was better.  they would be ok if he had rebounding at 30 +
In every thread about recruits you say something pretty much like this.  IMO, both of these guys would be pretty good d2 PGs, but they are both BACKUPS for me to a guy hopefully that is good enough.  I'm in a bloody battle for him and it is very close.  Just in case I lose, I wanted to be able to make a quick decision about who to go after.  So I did find another option that was better.  Also, why do these PGs need 30+ rebounding?
8/10/2010 9:56 AM
blackdog3377
Posts: 1691 (0)
Hall of Famer
190 2 1
Prospect
If youre looking for a backup point I might take B then. Better BH and passing.
8/10/2010 10:03 AM
brip87
Posts: 421 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1
Prospect
Posted by tkimble on 8/10/2010 9:56:00 AM (view original):
Posted by brip87 on 8/10/2010 9:11:00 AM (view original):
I would find another option that was better.  they would be ok if he had rebounding at 30 +
In every thread about recruits you say something pretty much like this.  IMO, both of these guys would be pretty good d2 PGs, but they are both BACKUPS for me to a guy hopefully that is good enough.  I'm in a bloody battle for him and it is very close.  Just in case I lose, I wanted to be able to make a quick decision about who to go after.  So I did find another option that was better.  Also, why do these PGs need 30+ rebounding?

If they had reb then they could play sf since neither is a championship caliber pg. Ill hold my thoughts from you.  never mind what i said good luck

8/10/2010 10:19 AM
tkimble
Posts: 1347 (0)
Hall of Famer
2 335 1 1
Rookie
Posted by brip87 on 8/10/2010 10:19:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tkimble on 8/10/2010 9:56:00 AM (view original):
Posted by brip87 on 8/10/2010 9:11:00 AM (view original):
I would find another option that was better.  they would be ok if he had rebounding at 30 +
In every thread about recruits you say something pretty much like this.  IMO, both of these guys would be pretty good d2 PGs, but they are both BACKUPS for me to a guy hopefully that is good enough.  I'm in a bloody battle for him and it is very close.  Just in case I lose, I wanted to be able to make a quick decision about who to go after.  So I did find another option that was better.  Also, why do these PGs need 30+ rebounding?

If they had reb then they could play sf since neither is a championship caliber pg. Ill hold my thoughts from you.  never mind what i said good luck

If you took offense I apologize.  I do enjoy reading your posts and I do value your opinion.  Just because I had a small beef with what you said doesn't mean I want you to hold your thoughts from me.  
8/10/2010 10:51 AM
brianp87
Posts: 1340 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 46 89
Prospect

Sorry I took it the wrong way.  But yes I feel that a pg needs to be as close to 90 in spd,bh,and pass as a senior.  Everything else is just a bonus imho

8/10/2010 11:32 AM
tkimble
Posts: 1347 (0)
Hall of Famer
2 335 1 1
Rookie
Well this guy(as a senior) comes pretty close:
ATH 70
SPD 90
REB 35
DEF 80
LP 1 with high
PER 70
BH 80
PAS 75


This is the guy I'm battling for.  It's going to be really close, but I think I'm going to lose out on this one.
8/10/2010 11:50 AM
12 Next ▸
LP guard vs. Per Guard Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.