better 3pt shooter? Topic

I am struggling between two recruits. I am looking for the most effective 3 pt threat, as my team as been lacking a legit shooter for a few seasons now. Any thoughts would be much appreciated (I don't have the scouting evals for the potentials yet).

SG
2.6
57
66
33
47
15
34
1
22
49
33
54
56
58
65
41
PG
2.8
42.4
59
52
46
24
50
13
12
42
15
15
47
70
45
38.2
SG
3.6
51.3
70
40
64
1
40
1
1
39
51
28
75
58
44
442

10/19/2012 9:05 AM
Really depends on whether their PER potential, whichever one is high-high potential, but I would go for the 3rd recruit, his WE and GPA will help him max out pretty quickly, and will probably have the best P/BH combo.
10/19/2012 9:19 AM
I tried to sort of map them out where they might be. For high, I used +24, for Avg I used +12, and for Low I used +4.

#3 has more speed and BH than #1, but his PER is slightly worse. I've seen a few instances of 3 pt shooters having decent (mid/high 60s) in PER, but have great speed (>85) and be really successful. Has anyone else noticed this?

SG
2.6
57
66
45
71
27
58
1
26
73
45
58
61
82
89
636
PG
2.8
42.4
59
56
58
24
82
13
24
66
39
39
52
82
57
592
SG
3.6
51.3
70
44
88
1
52
1
1
63
55
52
80
82
48
567
10/19/2012 9:30 AM
For PER and LP you really need to scout, if they are HiHi you can see 50+ gains easily.

Also, I have found that SPD and BH are necessary for good 3 point shooters.  I like to have my 3 point shooters have a minimum of 60 speed, 60 perimeter, and 50 BH at DIII.
10/19/2012 9:40 AM
The theory seems to be that better BH/speed will trump a higher PER rating. Would you agree with this trenton?
10/19/2012 9:43 AM
No.  Perimeter is MOST important  but speed and BH are important.

I would take a 90 PER, 45 Speed, 45 BH  over a  60/60/60 guy as a shooter.   I wouldn't take a 90/30/30 guy over a 60/60/60 guy though.
10/19/2012 10:19 AM
I'd take #3 if you want a PER threat, but like others have said, HH ratings could change that easily.
10/19/2012 10:22 AM
Also, I have found that SPD and BH are necessary for good 3 point shooters.  I like to have my 3 point shooters have a minimum of 60 speed, 60 perimeter, and 50 BH at DIII.

I'm not denying that SPD and BH can be important, but last season at my DIII team I had a player who is now at 49 SPD, 51 BH  and 86 PER (and he gained some in all of those so he was less than that at times) shoot over 47 percent from three and he took a decent number of them too.

I don't think it's necessary to have tremendous SPD and BH to make a guy be a good three point shooter, especially at the DIII level. It's always nice to have those things, but I think once a player gets beyond 80 in PER he'll shoot good on threes almost no matter what because the quality of defenders he is facing across a season isn't that high at DIII that he needs the extra SPD to get around them or the extra BH to hold onto the ball as well. It's nice to have and probably helps, but not necessary to shoot well at DIII. Just my opinion.
10/19/2012 10:29 AM
Posted by bistiza on 10/19/2012 10:29:00 AM (view original):
Also, I have found that SPD and BH are necessary for good 3 point shooters.  I like to have my 3 point shooters have a minimum of 60 speed, 60 perimeter, and 50 BH at DIII.

I'm not denying that SPD and BH can be important, but last season at my DIII team I had a player who is now at 49 SPD, 51 BH  and 86 PER (and he gained some in all of those so he was less than that at times) shoot over 47 percent from three and he took a decent number of them too.

I don't think it's necessary to have tremendous SPD and BH to make a guy be a good three point shooter, especially at the DIII level. It's always nice to have those things, but I think once a player gets beyond 80 in PER he'll shoot good on threes almost no matter what because the quality of defenders he is facing across a season isn't that high at DIII that he needs the extra SPD to get around them or the extra BH to hold onto the ball as well. It's nice to have and probably helps, but not necessary to shoot well at DIII. Just my opinion.
schedule strength really makes these sort of overall percent figures relatively useless as points of comparison. theres plenty of teams ive had with 2 or 3 of the top five 3 point shooters in the nation and none cracked the top 10 in 3pt% (with #1 sos).

in particular, against weaker teams, high per unsupported can be much more effective. my guess is that if you watched that player against a bunch of NT quality teams, you'd have seen a much lower 3pt%.

to the OP - heres how it works. perimeter is the #1 stat for 3 point shooting, but you can have successful 3 point shooters without stellar per numbers. basically, if you think of it like this, it will serve you well. spd/bh and to a significantly lesser extent, ath, help you get open looks. per is what really impacts if the ball goes in when you toss it up. if you are taking a lot of highly contested shots, any player will struggle, no matter what the per. if you are taking a lot of wide open looks, players can be very very successful even with only good per. 

so what the ratio of the importance of these stats are changes based on your situation and goals. when i had about the best team in the country every single year, and i only determined success by championship or not, i only cared about the ratings in relation to the absolute best teams. for those teams, its ABSOLUTELY CRITICAL that you have great spd/bh to get better looks. my best 3 point shooters (in the big games, not by season % persay) were often my 90 spd/bh 80 per type guys, not my 75-80 bh/pass 90-95 per type guys. in these cases, i figured 1 point of per was worth at most 1.5 points of speed, for a high caliber (among best in nation type) shooting guard. now, thats from a PURE SCORING standpoint ONLY, that does not include defense or anything, and obviously i would rank speed as the #1 attribute in those cases in general.

now, if you are building a team, trying to become a regular NT team, and maybe win a couple NT games here and there, your competition is lower. you will face lower quality defense and per becomes the dominant stat by a wide margin, its probably worth at least double any other stat (again, from a PURELY OFFENSE standpoint ONLY). the reason being, you are going to naturally get better looks against shittier defense, so you need per to take advantage of those looks more than you need spd/bh to get better looks.

hopefully that gives you some idea. 

note that offense set plays a MAJOR role in 3 point scoring. opinions vary about the impact of offenses but ive studied it as much (or more) than anyone, and i almost always focus my offense around 3 point / guard scoring, and its very very obvious to me that 3 point scoring is one of the biggest, if not THE biggest difference in how offenses work with respect to player ratings. in flex and triangle, you really need that high per rating to be a very successful 3 point scorer. in motion, its much more reliant on spd/per than triangle/flex, and you can get awesome efficiency without the lofty per numbers. fastbreak is its own beast, ath/spd take a premium role with per taking a lesser role like motion (maybe even less than motion), and bh im not too sure about, fb is not my specialty. note that per is always going to be very important for 3 point shooting, its pretty much always your most important stat for well formed high end players, but theres a huge range in variance (it could be barely the most important, or it could be 2x any other stat). for example, in d1, ive had insanely good performance out of my motion offense guards with 95 spd/bh 80 per type guys. but in a triangle set, that player will be good, sure, but not a world beater, not in the elite d1 play (this was during the coin flip dynasty days, when there were a lot more talented players, too). in triangle, youd be significantly better off with a 85 spd/bh 100 per guy (thats trading 1 point of bh or spd for 1 point of per). but in motion, id actually probably take that 95 spd/bh 80 per type guy, again OFFENSE ONLY. if you are thinking, that goes against what i said - per is probably always #1 - note that for a 95 spd/bh 80 per motion offense player, if i could pick 1 point to improve, it would be to go up to 81 per. its not always black and white, but what i said is effectively true - for an elite, best in the country type player, or for any general well-formed offense-oriented guard - you always would take that 1 point of per if you could take 1 point (offense only). just like with bigs, there are bigs you'd rather have 1 or 10 points of reb than 1 or 10 points of ath. but for a best in the country type big, you'd ALWAYS take the 1 point of ath.

anyway, hope that helps. let me know if you have any follow-ups...
10/19/2012 11:38 AM (edited)
UPDATE

Apparently I won't be able to get either of the two top choices...one said I'm a backup but the 'ship message said "Although I'm not saying no, I'm just saying it's very unlikely." Bastard isn't even considering anyone else....anyway...

PG
2.8
42.4
59
52
46
24
50
13
12
42
15
15
47
70
45
431
PG
2.4
47
69
54
63
1
30
1
13
30
51
36
70
71
29
449

Here are what looks like my only two options.

I only have scouting evals for #1, will be sending #2 this cycle. They are:
- Good athleticism and I don't think we're going to see much improvement.
- Great speed at his position - I think with the proper conditioning program we can improve his quickness.
- Excellent outside shooter - I see such solid fundamentals that with enough practice I don't see why he can't be a *significantly* better shooter than he is today..
- Defensive fundamentals need work - I really think we could see massive improvement by his Senior year.
- Passing needs work - with more experience I expect to see TREMENDOUS improvement.

10/19/2012 11:40 AM
Posted by jkumpulanian on 10/19/2012 11:40:00 AM (view original):
UPDATE

Apparently I won't be able to get either of the two top choices...one said I'm a backup but the 'ship message said "Although I'm not saying no, I'm just saying it's very unlikely." Bastard isn't even considering anyone else....anyway...

PG
2.8
42.4
59
52
46
24
50
13
12
42
15
15
47
70
45
431
PG
2.4
47
69
54
63
1
30
1
13
30
51
36
70
71
29
449

Here are what looks like my only two options.

I only have scouting evals for #1, will be sending #2 this cycle. They are:
- Good athleticism and I don't think we're going to see much improvement.
- Great speed at his position - I think with the proper conditioning program we can improve his quickness.
- Excellent outside shooter - I see such solid fundamentals that with enough practice I don't see why he can't be a *significantly* better shooter than he is today..
- Defensive fundamentals need work - I really think we could see massive improvement by his Senior year.
- Passing needs work - with more experience I expect to see TREMENDOUS improvement.

that scholarship message doesn't stop you from pulling him down, that just means you didnt spend enough yet to do so. as long as you are sure about the backup message i guess! what happened with the other guy?
10/19/2012 11:49 AM
I've gotten multiple things indicating I'm a backup, so I am assuming thats legitimate. The other guy "Just my gut here, but I think you're chasing something you'll never catch. He's convinced he's going to play at a higher level than Martin Luther. I think he can too." So there goes that. I guess I will keep trying to pull down the backup and hope for good things.
10/19/2012 11:56 AM
Posted by coach_billyg on 10/19/2012 11:49:00 AM (view original):
Posted by jkumpulanian on 10/19/2012 11:40:00 AM (view original):
UPDATE

Apparently I won't be able to get either of the two top choices...one said I'm a backup but the 'ship message said "Although I'm not saying no, I'm just saying it's very unlikely." Bastard isn't even considering anyone else....anyway...

PG
2.8
42.4
59
52
46
24
50
13
12
42
15
15
47
70
45
431
PG
2.4
47
69
54
63
1
30
1
13
30
51
36
70
71
29
449

Here are what looks like my only two options.

I only have scouting evals for #1, will be sending #2 this cycle. They are:
- Good athleticism and I don't think we're going to see much improvement.
- Great speed at his position - I think with the proper conditioning program we can improve his quickness.
- Excellent outside shooter - I see such solid fundamentals that with enough practice I don't see why he can't be a *significantly* better shooter than he is today..
- Defensive fundamentals need work - I really think we could see massive improvement by his Senior year.
- Passing needs work - with more experience I expect to see TREMENDOUS improvement.

that scholarship message doesn't stop you from pulling him down, that just means you didnt spend enough yet to do so. as long as you are sure about the backup message i guess! what happened with the other guy?
Yeah, that's like with my d3 guys on my beloit team cotner- he has a lower athleticism base, speed high, passing and perimeter and ball handling is high but i have set him to a 0, or +1, cause of his lower ath. 22 for 50 (44%) from three in 13 games.
10/19/2012 1:04 PM
I don't think ATH plays a real big role in 3 pt shooting.   I have had guys be very successful  shooting the 3 with ATH in the teens and twenties in DIII.
10/19/2012 2:54 PM
UPDATE #2

The guy who I am apparently a backup for just rejected 2 HVs. Should I keep sending HVs or spring for a CV?

Of the other two "fallback" options, their high-highs are:

#1: DEF, PER, P (didn't get anything back for BH)
#2: BH (LP was a high, didn't get anything back for DEF)

Any changes?  I am leaning towards #1 but he is not even considering me yet and has rejected a HV in the past.
10/19/2012 2:54 PM
123 Next ▸
better 3pt shooter? Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.