Posted by acn24 on 10/31/2013 9:23:00 AM (view original):
Posted by jetwildcat on 10/31/2013 8:36:00 AM (view original):
I'm similar to dacj in terms of checking as well, try to double-up the cycles to get the total checks down. but the very specific checking windows make for a good number of inconvenient times.
i'm not necessarily saying the current setup is terrible...besides the 2-hour first cycle. that is terrible.
are we so sure the game would be worse with half as many cycles? you can check 4 times per day more at your leisure or check twice a day strategically. twice as much is now happening each cycle (at least in theory, could end up being more or less than that).
also it would be nice to go to bed knowing that missing the 2am-5am EST cycle won't potentially hurt your team
I think reducing the number of cycles gives a bigger advantage to high prestige/big money schools, and those schools definitely don't need any more advantages.
Why are people so concerned about missing cycles, beyond the first couple? If you're in a battle and you miss the 2-5 EST cycle, just double up during the 5-8 cycle. Or add in extra effort in the 11-2 cycle before you go to sleep. Almost all battles are resolved at either 11 AM EST the day after signings or the 8 AM EST cycle the last day of signings, so you've got room to miss a cycle or two.
How fast someone wins a "battle" has a lot to do with how much someone is winning by. The typical decision times you're referring to probably apply for true 'battles' that are close.
This situation is 100% possible:
2:00pm - Bobby Brown only considering you
5:00pm - Bobby Brown only considering Syracuse (Cuse obviously dumped a ton of cash before 5:00pm)
8:00pm - Bobby Brown signs with Syracuse
If you miss the 5pm-8pm cycle, you can lose a recruit and never be the wiser. This applies most directly to when signings start, but it's also possible on Day 3 that Bobby Brown is your backup option to another player you're battling. It can happen.