Pitcher ratings Topic

arcticlegend
Posts: 484 (0)
Hall of Famer
2 200
Rookie
Now that I've got a few seasons under my belt, I have made some observations about player ratings. I wanted to run these by the experts and see if I'm on the right track. Does this seem correct to you?

1. Control is a very important rating. If a pitcher has control below 50, he's probably never going to succeed in the Majors (with some few exceptions). 70 or more is preferable.
2. However, there is not a huge difference at the top end. A pitcher with control of 90 is better than a guy with 75 control, but not by a huge margin.
3. VR is a very important rating. If a pitcher has vR below 50, he is probably never going to succeed in the Majors. Again, 70 or more is preferable.
4. Unlike control, there is a BIG difference at the top of the scale. A pitcher with 90 vR vs. one with 75 vR is the difference between an ace and a mid-rotation guy.
5/14/2014 6:15 PM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
IMO, VR is easily the most important rating.   I'm less of a control stickler. 

My Coop team was 2nd in ERA with 5 SP/LR types with control of 49, 50. 53, 57, 57.   But I have 3 VR at 88 and 2 at 81 on my staff.    P1 is important also(I've got it on par with control).    3 under 79 at 74(P2 at 76), 73 and 68(P2-P4 at 79, 60, 52). 
5/14/2014 9:50 PM
damag
Posts: 5549 (0)
Hall of Famer
1751 77 11
Veteran
One thing I believe I figured out is that good P1/P2 can prop up lesser splits, and poor P1/P2 can torpedo good splits. I also figure minimum control can be down around 45 if a pitcher has good splits and pitches.

5/14/2014 10:17 PM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
Hardball Dynasty – Fantasy Baseball Sim Games - Player Profile: Cesar Suarez and Hardball Dynasty – Fantasy Baseball Sim Games - Player Profile: Andres Jimenez have been pretty successful. 

Hardball Dynasty – Fantasy Baseball Sim Games - Player Profile: Ivan Bonilla is a smaller sample size and he has found little success with my Coop team.
5/14/2014 10:51 PM
arcticlegend
Posts: 484 (0)
Hall of Famer
2 200
Rookie
I'm still trying to sort out what I think about P1 and P2, which is why I didn't include it in my list of observations. I've been looking for some odd combinations to see how they do. For example, I have a guy whose P1 and P2 are 69/81, and I want to know if that's an okay combination. Problem is, this guy has splits of just 62-61, so I don't know of be sucks because of his splits or his pitches.

Can a pitcher be successful with a P1 under 70 if he has a good P2? Lets say for the sake of argument that his vR and control are both around 70.
5/14/2014 11:19 PM
burnsy483
Posts: 6848 (0)
Veteran
1 1 26
Prospect
If you have a pitcher with great splits, think 80-85+, it seems to almost nullify pitches as low as 65-65-60-45 or whatever.  But if your splits are in the 70s or lower, it's no good.  I could be wrong, it's just my observation.
5/15/2014 10:15 AM
mongoose_22
Posts: 597 (0)
Hall of Famer
3 5 124
Prospect
I tend to agree with Mike. VR is #1 for me. Followed by CTRL and P1, then P2 and VL and then the rest.
5/15/2014 11:12 AM
tufft
Posts: 959 (0)
Hall of Famer
65
Prospect
arcticlegend - Generally, you seem to be on it. If you keep testing & tinkering, you'll find all the ratings work together. One or more being higher works to offset one or more being lower.

Low control is very hard to makeup for.  There can't be a Nolan Ryan or Fergie Jenkins in HBD. Maybe for one season, but not for a career.

Like in real baseball, the ballpark and the D behind the pitcher matter a lot. You go with sluggers over D up the middle, your pitching stats will be much worse than the same staff on a team that chose D over hitting. Slugging up the middle might be the right call, but your pitching will suffer.


5/15/2014 4:09 PM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
Hardball Dynasty – Fantasy Baseball Sim Games - Player Profile: Ryne Narveson averaged 4.15 BB per 9 in almost 3500 innings and won a CY.   I got him from an owner who insisted on 70+ control. 
5/15/2014 4:28 PM
crickett13
Posts: 2396 (0)
Hall of Famer
398 74 25 145
Prospect
Posted by tufft on 5/15/2014 4:09:00 PM (view original):
arcticlegend - Generally, you seem to be on it. If you keep testing & tinkering, you'll find all the ratings work together. One or more being higher works to offset one or more being lower.

Low control is very hard to makeup for.  There can't be a Nolan Ryan or Fergie Jenkins in HBD. Maybe for one season, but not for a career.

Like in real baseball, the ballpark and the D behind the pitcher matter a lot. You go with sluggers over D up the middle, your pitching stats will be much worse than the same staff on a team that chose D over hitting. Slugging up the middle might be the right call, but your pitching will suffer.


I don't get the Jenkins reference. He had great control.
5/15/2014 8:02 PM
tufft
Posts: 959 (0)
Hall of Famer
65
Prospect
Yeah, bad call on the Jenkins analogy. Not sure what I was thinking. How about Bob Feller? Or young Randy Johnson?

Setting aside my crap example, the game does not create high walk, high strikeout, very low BAA SPs.

5/15/2014 8:50 PM
crickett13
Posts: 2396 (0)
Hall of Famer
398 74 25 145
Prospect
Sorry tuft I had more to say but got called away. Now its late and I'm too tired to think straight
5/16/2014 1:27 AM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect

I checked.   VR, CON, VL, P1, P2 in that order of importance.   Each rating is weighted and VR carries a much heavier number.   That said, 98 control/P1 with 47/51 VL/VR still isn't likely to do much pitching for my BL team regardless of the formula number.

5/16/2014 11:54 AM
damag
Posts: 5549 (0)
Hall of Famer
1751 77 11
Veteran
One owner in my world... his team currently leads the majors in ERA and WHIP... purposely does not use any LH pitching.

Basically, unless a LH pitcher has excellent VR, this owner sees them as not worth bothering with considering the imbalance of RH bats to LH bats.

5/16/2014 12:10 PM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
I like it when owners automatically dismiss a player because of some pre-set belief. 

I haven't checked for awhile but it was 68/32.   I wouldn't dismiss 32% of AB as unimportant.
5/16/2014 12:38 PM
123 Next ▸
Pitcher ratings Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.