Look at this guys untapped potential Topic

Sr. C 79 36 84 80 58 28 1 24 38 18 92 72 610

https://www.whatifsports.com/hd/PlayerProfile/Ratings.aspx?tid=0&pid=3411466
I wonder where I went wrong I like natural training on this game and not playing underclassmen. But this guy got my full training and he is still untapped!
1/6/2017 7:25 AM
Started with 10 WE.
1/6/2017 7:40 AM
Mystery solved.
1/6/2017 8:23 AM
Posted by CoachWard95 on 1/6/2017 7:25:00 AM (view original):
Sr. C 79 36 84 80 58 28 1 24 38 18 92 72 610

https://www.whatifsports.com/hd/PlayerProfile/Ratings.aspx?tid=0&pid=3411466
I wonder where I went wrong I like natural training on this game and not playing underclassmen. But this guy got my full training and he is still untapped!
Uhhhhhh???? Work ethic? You know https://www.whatifsports.com/hd/PlayerProfile/Default.aspx?pid=3532347 isn't going to improve at all, right?
1/6/2017 8:25 AM
Posted by cubcub113 on 1/6/2017 8:27:00 AM (view original):
Posted by CoachWard95 on 1/6/2017 7:25:00 AM (view original):
Sr. C 79 36 84 80 58 28 1 24 38 18 92 72 610

https://www.whatifsports.com/hd/PlayerProfile/Ratings.aspx?tid=0&pid=3411466
I wonder where I went wrong I like natural training on this game and not playing underclassmen. But this guy got my full training and he is still untapped!
Uhhhhhh???? Work ethic? You know https://www.whatifsports.com/hd/PlayerProfile/Default.aspx?pid=3532347 isn't going to improve at all, right?
Big difference between a 1 and 10 WE.
1/6/2017 8:51 AM
I've decided I will not take anyone below a 25 WE. It's really frustrating seeing a player as a senior with still blues and greens.
1/6/2017 11:12 AM
Posted by skinndogg on 1/6/2017 11:12:00 AM (view original):
I've decided I will not take anyone below a 25 WE. It's really frustrating seeing a player as a senior with still blues and greens.
It is but its nice to see that great potential though!
1/6/2017 11:48 AM

1/6/2017 11:51 AM
Hmmm.... I remember telling you ages ago that one of the primary keys to this game is knowing how to develop players. I remember telling you that, if you were going to sign a guy like that, then you needed to feed him starts and minutes to develop him.

You ignored me. Never have figured out how to develop players. I mean...look at Frank Sander! A starting guard that is losing ratings in BH & DEF. What the hell is that guy practicing?! On top of which, you use terms like "natural training" to describe what can only be described as "abject neglect".

As TJ suggests, if a coach is willing to make appropriate choices, then you can develop a player, especially a C or PG, with a WE between 10-15 at the start. They've got to be fed minutes very early on and you've got to make correct decisions about what to practice. It's not very hard.
1/6/2017 11:53 AM
when able to do so, I love to redshirt a guy with low WE - gives his IQ a chance to get useful, since he learns slowly

and if you can give him mins/starts his WE will go up quicker.
1/6/2017 11:55 AM
Posted by fd343ny on 1/6/2017 11:55:00 AM (view original):
when able to do so, I love to redshirt a guy with low WE - gives his IQ a chance to get useful, since he learns slowly

and if you can give him mins/starts his WE will go up quicker.
The oldschool way, that can still work, was to start a low WE recruit as a freshman, then apply the RS as a sophomore...after picking up a few points of WE. I don't really like using RS below ~15 WE. It's too rough to wait the RS year, then see the initial OVR lower than as an incoming freshman. Although the IQ boost is helpful.
1/6/2017 12:04 PM
Posted by rogelio on 1/6/2017 11:53:00 AM (view original):
Hmmm.... I remember telling you ages ago that one of the primary keys to this game is knowing how to develop players. I remember telling you that, if you were going to sign a guy like that, then you needed to feed him starts and minutes to develop him.

You ignored me. Never have figured out how to develop players. I mean...look at Frank Sander! A starting guard that is losing ratings in BH & DEF. What the hell is that guy practicing?! On top of which, you use terms like "natural training" to describe what can only be described as "abject neglect".

As TJ suggests, if a coach is willing to make appropriate choices, then you can develop a player, especially a C or PG, with a WE between 10-15 at the start. They've got to be fed minutes very early on and you've got to make correct decisions about what to practice. It's not very hard.
I am kinda slacking in changing practice plans during non-conference to conference-play. That's the only part I am not good at never get around to it. Natural Training just means "the player practices and is run by sim engine and it develops that way". Lets not start this argruing please.
1/6/2017 12:10 PM
Posted by CoachWard95 on 1/6/2017 12:10:00 PM (view original):
Posted by rogelio on 1/6/2017 11:53:00 AM (view original):
Hmmm.... I remember telling you ages ago that one of the primary keys to this game is knowing how to develop players. I remember telling you that, if you were going to sign a guy like that, then you needed to feed him starts and minutes to develop him.

You ignored me. Never have figured out how to develop players. I mean...look at Frank Sander! A starting guard that is losing ratings in BH & DEF. What the hell is that guy practicing?! On top of which, you use terms like "natural training" to describe what can only be described as "abject neglect".

As TJ suggests, if a coach is willing to make appropriate choices, then you can develop a player, especially a C or PG, with a WE between 10-15 at the start. They've got to be fed minutes very early on and you've got to make correct decisions about what to practice. It's not very hard.
I am kinda slacking in changing practice plans during non-conference to conference-play. That's the only part I am not good at never get around to it. Natural Training just means "the player practices and is run by sim engine and it develops that way". Lets not start this argruing please.
I don't intend on belaboring the point, but being "slack" in changing practice plans would be not adjusting after initially setting them. You are allowing a poorly designed default logic to play the game for you from the get go!

Seble shat that logic out onto the keyboard while drinking cheap whiskey and watching porn. Just so you know...
1/6/2017 12:52 PM
Posted by rogelio on 1/6/2017 12:52:00 PM (view original):
Posted by CoachWard95 on 1/6/2017 12:10:00 PM (view original):
Posted by rogelio on 1/6/2017 11:53:00 AM (view original):
Hmmm.... I remember telling you ages ago that one of the primary keys to this game is knowing how to develop players. I remember telling you that, if you were going to sign a guy like that, then you needed to feed him starts and minutes to develop him.

You ignored me. Never have figured out how to develop players. I mean...look at Frank Sander! A starting guard that is losing ratings in BH & DEF. What the hell is that guy practicing?! On top of which, you use terms like "natural training" to describe what can only be described as "abject neglect".

As TJ suggests, if a coach is willing to make appropriate choices, then you can develop a player, especially a C or PG, with a WE between 10-15 at the start. They've got to be fed minutes very early on and you've got to make correct decisions about what to practice. It's not very hard.
I am kinda slacking in changing practice plans during non-conference to conference-play. That's the only part I am not good at never get around to it. Natural Training just means "the player practices and is run by sim engine and it develops that way". Lets not start this argruing please.
I don't intend on belaboring the point, but being "slack" in changing practice plans would be not adjusting after initially setting them. You are allowing a poorly designed default logic to play the game for you from the get go!

Seble shat that logic out onto the keyboard while drinking cheap whiskey and watching porn. Just so you know...
Best comment of 2017... I am laughing my ...
1/6/2017 1:41 PM
Posted by rogelio on 1/6/2017 12:52:00 PM (view original):
Posted by CoachWard95 on 1/6/2017 12:10:00 PM (view original):
Posted by rogelio on 1/6/2017 11:53:00 AM (view original):
Hmmm.... I remember telling you ages ago that one of the primary keys to this game is knowing how to develop players. I remember telling you that, if you were going to sign a guy like that, then you needed to feed him starts and minutes to develop him.

You ignored me. Never have figured out how to develop players. I mean...look at Frank Sander! A starting guard that is losing ratings in BH & DEF. What the hell is that guy practicing?! On top of which, you use terms like "natural training" to describe what can only be described as "abject neglect".

As TJ suggests, if a coach is willing to make appropriate choices, then you can develop a player, especially a C or PG, with a WE between 10-15 at the start. They've got to be fed minutes very early on and you've got to make correct decisions about what to practice. It's not very hard.
I am kinda slacking in changing practice plans during non-conference to conference-play. That's the only part I am not good at never get around to it. Natural Training just means "the player practices and is run by sim engine and it develops that way". Lets not start this argruing please.
I don't intend on belaboring the point, but being "slack" in changing practice plans would be not adjusting after initially setting them. You are allowing a poorly designed default logic to play the game for you from the get go!

Seble shat that logic out onto the keyboard while drinking cheap whiskey and watching porn. Just so you know...
Not Seble. That sounds more like these forums most days ...
1/6/2017 8:44 PM (edited)
12 Next ▸
Look at this guys untapped potential Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.