Is this guy a 3 point shooter Topic

DII, I'm wondering if I should set this big to -1 on the 3PT setting:

Athleticism 53
4
 
Speed 16
3
 
Rebounding 87
12
 
Defense 45
7
 
Shot Blocking 84
7
 
Low-post 79
 
 
Perimeter 42
13
 
Ball Handling 29
1
 
Passing 12
 
 
Work Ethic 89
1
 
Stamina 75
13
 
Durability 52
12
 
FT Shooting C+  

I would certainly set a guard with that PER rating to -1, and the ATH is good, but not great.  Will the lack speed drag down the PER effectiveness, or is this guy built like Zydrunas Ilgauskas?

Thanks for the advice,

homr
4/21/2011 5:37 AM

I would go -1 with him

4/21/2011 7:26 AM
I have a guy that has pretty similar skills to yours on my Naismith team. Through 8 games set at a -1 he is shooting 3-13 from 3.
4/21/2011 10:25 AM
Posted by homrbush on 4/21/2011 5:37:00 AM (view original):
DII, I'm wondering if I should set this big to -1 on the 3PT setting:

Athleticism 53
4
 
Speed 16
3
 
Rebounding 87
12
 
Defense 45
7
 
Shot Blocking 84
7
 
Low-post 79
 
 
Perimeter 42
13
 
Ball Handling 29
1
 
Passing 12
 
 
Work Ethic 89
1
 
Stamina 75
13
 
Durability 52
12
 
FT Shooting C+  

I would certainly set a guard with that PER rating to -1, and the ATH is good, but not great.  Will the lack speed drag down the PER effectiveness, or is this guy built like Zydrunas Ilgauskas?

Thanks for the advice,

homr
-2 for now, if he hits 55-60 at some point I'd consider a -1
4/21/2011 7:20 PM
-2 for sure. 
4/21/2011 9:02 PM
-1
4/21/2011 9:12 PM
My basic formula is 0-40 (-2), 40-80 (-1), 80+ (0).  and with him only being a JR, you have another whole season left for him to improve some more. So I would set him to -1 to start getting him comfortable with shooting from the perimeter now, so he's more adept next season.
4/21/2011 9:44 PM
I would never set that guy to -1, he'll be able to hit some J's, but I wouldn't want that guy anywhere near my perimeter. That's just my opinion though...
4/21/2011 9:49 PM
Posted by courtmagic on 4/21/2011 9:44:00 PM (view original):
My basic formula is 0-40 (-2), 40-80 (-1), 80+ (0).  and with him only being a JR, you have another whole season left for him to improve some more. So I would set him to -1 to start getting him comfortable with shooting from the perimeter now, so he's more adept next season.
Maybe it's just me but this post seems completely wrong.
4/21/2011 10:15 PM
I'd say that he's right on the borderline between a guy who should be at -1 and a guy who should be at -2.  Given that your team is really hurting for 3-point shooters and will likely face a lot of heavy - defenses, I'd go with -1.
4/21/2011 10:22 PM
Posted by smokindavis on 4/21/2011 10:15:00 PM (view original):
Posted by courtmagic on 4/21/2011 9:44:00 PM (view original):
My basic formula is 0-40 (-2), 40-80 (-1), 80+ (0).  and with him only being a JR, you have another whole season left for him to improve some more. So I would set him to -1 to start getting him comfortable with shooting from the perimeter now, so he's more adept next season.
Maybe it's just me but this post seems completely wrong.
It's wrong. There's no experience factor in this game. Just because a player chucked 300 3pt in his FR year doesn't mean he will be better from beyond the arc in his SO. year. 
4/21/2011 10:47 PM
Set the SG J. Duncan to +2, with a slightly higher distro if you are worried about teams going -3 against you. Setting this guy to take 3pt is not efficient, and also hurts your oreb since there' s a lower probability of a reb going to a person who missed the 3pta. 
4/21/2011 10:52 PM
Posted by courtmagic on 4/21/2011 9:44:00 PM (view original):
My basic formula is 0-40 (-2), 40-80 (-1), 80+ (0).  and with him only being a JR, you have another whole season left for him to improve some more. So I would set him to -1 to start getting him comfortable with shooting from the perimeter now, so he's more adept next season.
when do u set a guy to +1 or +2 then?
4/21/2011 11:51 PM
Posted by yanks250125 on 4/21/2011 11:51:00 PM (view original):
Posted by courtmagic on 4/21/2011 9:44:00 PM (view original):
My basic formula is 0-40 (-2), 40-80 (-1), 80+ (0).  and with him only being a JR, you have another whole season left for him to improve some more. So I would set him to -1 to start getting him comfortable with shooting from the perimeter now, so he's more adept next season.
when do u set a guy to +1 or +2 then?
Personally, I never (or maybe once out of a hundred opportunities) set any of my players at anything higher than 0.  Of course, I've also managed to choke away several great chances to make deep tourney runs, so take any bit of advice from this slightly better than mediocre coach with the proverbial grain of salt.
4/22/2011 12:56 AM
Posted by dcy0827 on 4/22/2011 12:56:00 AM (view original):
Posted by yanks250125 on 4/21/2011 11:51:00 PM (view original):
Posted by courtmagic on 4/21/2011 9:44:00 PM (view original):
My basic formula is 0-40 (-2), 40-80 (-1), 80+ (0).  and with him only being a JR, you have another whole season left for him to improve some more. So I would set him to -1 to start getting him comfortable with shooting from the perimeter now, so he's more adept next season.
when do u set a guy to +1 or +2 then?
Personally, I never (or maybe once out of a hundred opportunities) set any of my players at anything higher than 0.  Of course, I've also managed to choke away several great chances to make deep tourney runs, so take any bit of advice from this slightly better than mediocre coach with the proverbial grain of salt.
So if you have a guard with 30 ath, 100 spd, 100 per, and 60bh, you wouldn't put him at +2? Or is this the one of the 100 opportunities you would? Any time a player with over 80 per, I put him at at least +1. 
4/22/2011 1:52 AM
123 Next ▸
Is this guy a 3 point shooter Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.