Vikings(9-1): old Favre v. Favre-wannabe Topic

Quote: Originally Posted By disaacs on 9/10/2007
Outstanding job defensively...still work to go offensively, but it was a good game in beating the Falcons. AD needs to run all over the Lions next week to put that homer bobprobert in his place.
DOH! Bye Bye Vikings! Hey disaacs it's not too late to jump on the Lions Bandwagon!
9/21/2007 8:48 AM
I'm not that crazy.

I'll think about if the Lions are knocking on the playoffs' door. Right now, they aren't even close, especially if they continue to turn it over as many times as they are. And if Kitna gets another concussion, they're done because both O'Sullivan and Orlovsky are terrible.
9/23/2007 2:08 AM
North DivisionWLTPctPFPAHomeRoadDivConfStrk
Packers3001.00082502-01-00-02-0W3
Lions210.66777941-01-11-01-1L1
Bears120.33333581-10-10-00-1L1
Vikings120.33351361-00-20-11-1L2
9/24/2007 12:42 AM
We should be 2-1, but poor execution on the offense's part is holding us back. Make that 52-yarder vs. Detroit and get the Shiancoe call right or Ferguson making a catch he should make and we're 3-0. We're not that far away. It's the little things that are killing us.
9/24/2007 12:06 PM
except you still have to play the bears and packers twice and the lions once more after endzone kevin jones comes back. thats 5 more losses right there. at least you get the raiders. looks like 2-14 for the vikes this year. you have a real tough schedule coming up!
9/24/2007 12:34 PM
I agree with the tough schedule, but I don't think we'll go 2-14. The Bears aren't exactly setting the world on fire, and we should have beat them twice last season. The Packers game this week is going to be tough, but I'm still expecting us to be in it at the end.
9/25/2007 12:01 PM
Well, we were in it...only we lost once again. This team can't win the close ones.
10/1/2007 9:47 AM
Still ******* on about 2 games from last year? Games you lost because we were better?
Wow. Enjoy our suckitude this year, there'll be plenty to go 'round.
10/1/2007 1:34 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By mudbone1969 on 10/01/2007

Still ******* on about 2 games from last year? Games you lost because we were better?
You weren't the better team in the first game last year.

If Brad Johnson had cleanly handed it off to Taylor, you wouldn't have won. Although, I don't really care about that too much any longer, because that's water under the bridge. What's done is done.

The second game, while your defense was better, we still had multiple opportunities to win that game as well, but we just couldn't get it done, mainly due to our own ineptitude.

We'll see you in 2 weeks. Good Luck with Fav-ruh next week.
10/1/2007 4:29 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By disaacs on 10/01/2007
Quote: Originally Posted By mudbone1969 on 10/01/2007

Still ******* on about 2 games from last year? Games you lost because we were better?
You weren't the better team in the first game last year.

If Brad Johnson had cleanly handed it off to Taylor, you wouldn't have won. Although, I don't really care about that too much any longer, because that's water under the bridge. What's done is done.

The second game, while your defense was better, we still had multiple opportunities to win that game as well, but we just couldn't get it done, mainly due to our own ineptitude.

We'll see you in 2 weeks. Good Luck with Fav-ruh next week.
We were the better team all year and proved it by winning the NFC.

Favruh is gonna ginsu our secondary like that guy did the tomato in the commercial.
10/1/2007 5:46 PM
Quote: Originally posted by mudbone1969 on 10/01/2007Favruh is gonna ginsu our secondary like that guy did the tomato in the commercial.

Old school reference...nice. Wasn't that from the 80s?

That reminds me an awful lot of this guy...



"It's AMAZING!"
10/1/2007 10:21 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By teamjosh04 on 8/23/2006

You are giving to much credit to the Lions and Packers.
o rly?
edit: Just realized this post was a year old.
10/2/2007 8:55 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By disaacs on 8/31/2007
Holcomb isn't going to start unless Tarvaris gets injured. I don't think under any scenario with a healthy T-Jack that Holcomb is going to start at all. We're prepared to take the lumps that go along with developing a young QB...unlike the Chiefs.
Heh. T-Jack is worse than Brodie, but the Vikes have nothing else to even send out there.
10/2/2007 8:57 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By rolltide3 on 10/02/2007
Quote: Originally Posted By disaacs on 8/31/2007

Holcomb isn't going to start unless Tarvaris gets injured. I don't think under any scenario with a healthy T-Jack that Holcomb is going to start at all. We're prepared to take the lumps that go along with developing a young QB...unlike the Chiefs.
Heh. T-Jack is worse than Brodie, but the Vikes have nothing else to even send out there


I wouldn't say that, Brodie looked pretty awful in the preseason. He had one good drive and that was about it.
10/4/2007 2:42 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By mudbone1969 on 10/01/2007
Quote: Originally Posted By disaacs on 10/01/2007

Quote: Originally Posted By mudbone1969 on 10/01/2007

Still ******* on about 2 games from last year? Games you lost because we were better?
You weren't the better team in the first game last year.

If Brad Johnson had cleanly handed it off to Taylor, you wouldn't have won. Although, I don't really care about that too much any longer, because that's water under the bridge. What's done is done.

The second game, while your defense was better, we still had multiple opportunities to win that game as well, but we just couldn't get it done, mainly due to our own ineptitude.

We'll see you in 2 weeks. Good Luck with Fav-ruh next week.
We were the better team all year and proved it by winning the NFC.

Favruh is gonna ginsu our secondary like that guy did the tomato in the commercial.

ron popeil
10/4/2007 3:50 PM
◂ Prev 1...8|9|10|11|12...20 Next ▸
Vikings(9-1): old Favre v. Favre-wannabe Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.