Well, if you ran a game, at this point, I'm not sure it would do very well, with all of the things you have said.

whats wrong with having all games played at a neutral site? Maybe not the most realistic, but probably the most fair, no?

Quote: Originally posted by colonels19 on 1/17/2010Its a general opinion, you don't need to know how HD works to think/realize that sims should be less random than real life.

It is a general opinion of two people, that hardly makes it right.

Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 1/18/2010whats wrong with having all games played at a neutral site? Maybe not the most realistic, but probably the most fair, no

I thought we were going for a simulation, not 'Fair'. As for that, you conjtrol your non conference schedule, so its as fair or not as you want mby that measure, and your conference schedule is split eventy.

Quote: Originally posted by colonels19 on 1/18/2010If I ran a game, I most likely wouldn't use an HCA, if I did, it'd be very minimal.  I think since WIS quantifies it in HD and it is quantified in numerous ways in real life that it is a solid piece to this game...I think its fair that it matters.  There's nothing to gripe about there.

This shows where you stand on topics. The fact that you want to make it fair by having no HCA? We are going for a simulation and more real to life than farther away from it. While possibly having no HCA in testing could be helpful in a finished product that is supposed to be a dynasty for college basketball it would be unacceptable.

This is college basketball in my head:
1. March Madness
2. Tournaments
3. College Teams
4. Crazy Fans at home
5. Selection Sunday, bubbles, RPI, and rankings

Without these it wouldn't mirror college basketball fully in my head.

Quote: Originally Posted By a_in_the_b on 1/18/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 1/18/2010
whats wrong with having all games played at a neutral site? Maybe not the most realistic, but probably the most fair, no?

I thought we were going for a simulation, not 'Fair'. As for that, you conjtrol your non conference schedule, so its as fair or not as you want mby that measure, and your conference schedule is split eventy.

Simulations can't be fair? I think a league that has all of its contests at the same venue that gives no advantage to anyone is quite the novel concept. Its idealistic and unrealistic, but its novel.

Quote: Originally Posted By schroedess26 on 1/18/2010

Quote: Originally posted by colonels19 on 1/18/2010 If I ran a game, I most likely wouldn't use an HCA, if I did, it'd be very minimal. I think since WIS quantifies it in HD and it is quantified in numerous ways in real life that it is a solid piece to this game...I think its fair that it matters. There's nothing to gripe about there.

This shows where you stand on topics. The fact that you want to make it fair by having no HCA? We are going for a simulation and more real to life than farther away from it. While possibly having no HCA in testing could be helpful in a finished product that is supposed to be a dynasty for college basketball it would be unacceptable.

This is college basketball in my head:
1. March Madness
2. Tournaments
3. College Teams
4. Crazy Fans at home
5. Selection Sunday, bubbles, RPI, and rankings

Without these it wouldn't mirror college basketball fully in my head

I could easily include a small HCA factor like what WIS does...not hard at all

Stop talking about it and ******** about it and saying what you would do, either do it or shut up.

I guess my response to that is heed your own advice....God forbid I respond to questions/points people make towards me.

This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.

I'm not suggesting that WIS get rid of HCA...I think its a worthwhile part of the game...also if people pushed me enough in "my game" for an HCA factor, eventually I'd probably throw one in....one thing I've learned in life is to never say never.