Posted by jiml60 on 4/9/2011 11:31:00 PM (view original):
keep 'em for yourself, you obviously missed them in my post.

So you made a joke that promoted your side. I made a joke that promoted my side.

So whats the big deal?

Your joke sucked.

Posted by swamphawk22 on 4/9/2011 7:14:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tedco on 4/9/2011 4:34:00 PM (view original):
Anyone who believes this was a "clerical error" is a liar or a moron.

And what are you basing this statement on?

I am basing clearical error on the available data and comments from local officials.

What evidence, other than left wing talk radio, do you have that anything improper happened?

The "clerical error" explanation isn't believable in any way. I'm just using common sense. And considering the source. The woman responsible for this has a trail of corruption behind her and has again and again shown contempt for the process.

And in fact, I haven't had a chance to listen to any left wing talk radio on this topic yet. I actually listen to a lot more right wing talk radio.

I try to listen to both Right and Left wing talk to get balanced analysis.

Everyone seems to be sayign that her version of events makes sense. The vote total with the new people makes sense. Everything looks valid.

Clearical errors happen.

Should we let a simple typing error change an election?

Listening to left- and right-wing talk radio does not give you balance. It just exposes you to two different breeds of charlatan, and two different forms of ignorance.

Posted by antonsirius on 4/10/2011 3:41:00 PM (view original):
Listening to left- and right-wing talk radio does not give you balance. It just exposes you to two different breeds of charlatan, and two different forms of ignorance.

The elitism shows up again. Talk radio is very popular.

I feel I understand the left better when I listen to the callers on Ed Schultz or Stephanie Miller than I do listening to Meet the Press.

Rush may be a bit out there, but he isnt popular because he told people what to think, he is popular because people who think like him like to have their views affirmed.

Who the **** watches Meet the Press any more?

About 2 or 3 million people a week.

So statistically speaking, nobody then. Thanks for confirming that.

Posted by swamphawk22 on 4/10/2011 4:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by antonsirius on 4/10/2011 3:41:00 PM (view original):
Listening to left- and right-wing talk radio does not give you balance. It just exposes you to two different breeds of charlatan, and two different forms of ignorance.

The elitism shows up again. Talk radio is very popular.

I feel I understand the left better when I listen to the callers on Ed Schultz or Stephanie Miller than I do listening to Meet the Press.

Rush may be a bit out there, but he isnt popular because he told people what to think, he is popular because people who think like him like to have their views affirmed.

So Rush is like the right-wing's mommy; always ready to tell his "kiddies" everything is OK?

It isnt that far off.

People on the right are tired of constantly being told they are stupid hicks. That if you are wise you should like Abortion and Gay Rights and Taxes and Welefare and Illegal aliens.

We know what is right and what is wrong. Rush was the first person to stand up and say that you are not an idiot for supporting Traditional Conservative Values!

Traditional Conservative Values™





a swamphawk brand

Actually I think I got the from Rush.

Loud and Proud is me though!

The face of GOP traditional values!

And of course the left went about destroying Newt after his "Contract with America" led the Republicans to congressional victories.