Shtickless - Unless Being Dead Is A Shtick Topic

Posted by jwelsh1023 on 11/16/2010 10:17:00 AM (view original):
Posted by AlCheez on 11/16/2010 10:08:00 AM (view original):
VD won the deal, no question, but we've let worse go through without even a mention.

Like I said, I get the veto, I just don't get why it came now. I think Briese takes TJ Peters too siriusly.
In all honesty, I wouldn't have looked at it had briese not made a stink.  But I didn't veto because of briese.
Since you can't veto without looking at it - you kind of did.
11/16/2010 10:27 AM
And busk, it was a few weeks ago, not sure what worlds and what threads.
11/16/2010 10:32 AM
Posted by AlCheez on 11/16/2010 10:21:00 AM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 11/16/2010 10:18:00 AM (view original):
Posted by AlCheez on 11/16/2010 10:14:00 AM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 11/16/2010 10:12:00 AM (view original):
Posted by AlCheez on 11/16/2010 9:40:00 AM (view original):
Posted by jwelsh1023 on 11/16/2010 9:39:00 AM (view original):
leslie, if you want to hang out here and converse with us and be paid attention to, maybe just start posting funny or interesting things that drum up conversation instead of random screams of nonsense.  Getting upset because we named our thread and dont respond to your drivel is a bit silly.
Chow is just posting everywhere he can to get to the top spot in posts because he thinks that will drive the current resident of that spot nuts.
Who and why?
MikeT - because leslie assumes he takes his post ranking too siriusly.
What are you basing this one?

MikeT takes everything about himself too siriusly, but why does chow give a ****?
I saw him say he was going to take Mike's top post ranking in either a post or in one of his HBD world chat blow-ups (which were discussed in HBD forums and hilarious by the way) right before he started posting 200 times a day.

The guy is the latest alias of a lunatic that has a history of this kind of stuff.
Thats all well and good, but W's point still stands.  The guy needs to be funnier
11/16/2010 10:36 AM
Posted by AlCheez on 11/16/2010 10:27:00 AM (view original):
Posted by jwelsh1023 on 11/16/2010 10:17:00 AM (view original):
Posted by AlCheez on 11/16/2010 10:08:00 AM (view original):
VD won the deal, no question, but we've let worse go through without even a mention.

Like I said, I get the veto, I just don't get why it came now. I think Briese takes TJ Peters too siriusly.
In all honesty, I wouldn't have looked at it had briese not made a stink.  But I didn't veto because of briese.
Since you can't veto without looking at it - you kind of did.
I should have said, I did not veto because of briese's reasons
11/16/2010 10:37 AM
Posted by dherz_263 on 11/16/2010 9:49:00 AM (view original):
Posted by AlCheez on 11/16/2010 9:33:00 AM (view original):
I'm fine with the veto even though I didn't think it necessary, but when did anyone start caring about one-sided deals in $? We couldn't even stop blatent collusion last season.
I really think the issue is its this guys first season.  If Moy and Bot made the same deal, I dont know that it wouldve been made mention of in world chat, let alone vetoed
This.
11/16/2010 11:52 AM
Posted by jwelsh1023 on 11/16/2010 10:16:00 AM (view original):
Posted by AlCheez on 11/16/2010 10:03:00 AM (view original):
Posted by jwelsh1023 on 11/16/2010 10:01:00 AM (view original):
he's gonna hit over .300 with a High OBP.
He's not reaching those projections.
Probably not but if he gets close he is a ML hitter.
He is a possible All-Star in Texas. Good hitter's park.
11/16/2010 11:55 AM
Posted by vandydave on 11/16/2010 10:22:00 AM (view original):
Posted by jwelsh1023 on 11/16/2010 10:17:00 AM (view original):
Posted by AlCheez on 11/16/2010 10:08:00 AM (view original):
VD won the deal, no question, but we've let worse go through without even a mention.

Like I said, I get the veto, I just don't get why it came now. I think Briese takes TJ Peters too siriusly.
In all honesty, I wouldn't have looked at it had briese not made a stink.  But I didn't veto because of briese.

this trade does not threaten the integrity of the league, nor is it a vet owner stealing from a noob owner. its two owners who traded probably 20+ offers back and forth before finding a deal. if we are going to veto deals where one team gets the better side in public opinion then probably 75% of deals need to be vetoed from here on out.

and Briese has become high and mighty on his success, but does take Peters too siriusly, that guy is one injury from his career being done.

I don't understand high an mighty on success at all. My playoff success in Shtickless and HR is basically nil. Maybe I do take TJ Peters too siriusly, but if the deal was between VD and r0b0t, I wouldn't care.
11/16/2010 11:59 AM
Posted by AlCheez on 11/16/2010 10:21:00 AM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 11/16/2010 10:18:00 AM (view original):
Posted by AlCheez on 11/16/2010 10:14:00 AM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 11/16/2010 10:12:00 AM (view original):
Posted by AlCheez on 11/16/2010 9:40:00 AM (view original):
Posted by jwelsh1023 on 11/16/2010 9:39:00 AM (view original):
leslie, if you want to hang out here and converse with us and be paid attention to, maybe just start posting funny or interesting things that drum up conversation instead of random screams of nonsense.  Getting upset because we named our thread and dont respond to your drivel is a bit silly.
Chow is just posting everywhere he can to get to the top spot in posts because he thinks that will drive the current resident of that spot nuts.
Who and why?
MikeT - because leslie assumes he takes his post ranking too siriusly.
What are you basing this one?

MikeT takes everything about himself too siriusly, but why does chow give a ****?
I saw him say he was going to take Mike's top post ranking in either a post or in one of his HBD world chat blow-ups (which were discussed in HBD forums and hilarious by the way) right before he started posting 200 times a day.

The guy is the latest alias of a lunatic that has a history of this kind of stuff.
I do find it funny that he thinks I'm cresten. That tribute alias is the gift that keeps on giving.
11/16/2010 12:14 PM
Posted by robusk on 11/16/2010 10:27:00 AM (view original):
Posted by AlCheez on 11/16/2010 10:21:00 AM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 11/16/2010 10:18:00 AM (view original):
Posted by AlCheez on 11/16/2010 10:14:00 AM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 11/16/2010 10:12:00 AM (view original):
Posted by AlCheez on 11/16/2010 9:40:00 AM (view original):
Posted by jwelsh1023 on 11/16/2010 9:39:00 AM (view original):
leslie, if you want to hang out here and converse with us and be paid attention to, maybe just start posting funny or interesting things that drum up conversation instead of random screams of nonsense.  Getting upset because we named our thread and dont respond to your drivel is a bit silly.
Chow is just posting everywhere he can to get to the top spot in posts because he thinks that will drive the current resident of that spot nuts.
Who and why?
MikeT - because leslie assumes he takes his post ranking too siriusly.
What are you basing this one?

MikeT takes everything about himself too siriusly, but why does chow give a ****?
I saw him say he was going to take Mike's top post ranking in either a post or in one of his HBD world chat blow-ups (which were discussed in HBD forums and hilarious by the way) right before he started posting 200 times a day.

The guy is the latest alias of a lunatic that has a history of this kind of stuff.
Where might one find these nuggets?
Dunno if the world in question has rolled over, but this is the most recent thread about her shenanigans.
11/16/2010 12:20 PM
Yup, that's the world - 10/20 - 8:29 PM - BrianCampos has taken over the team so that's the user name that shows up.

11/16/2010 12:24 PM
Meh.  Absurd but not funny.
11/16/2010 12:41 PM
That guy lost his marbles.  good show, leslie ol chap.
11/16/2010 12:59 PM
Posted by cbriese on 11/16/2010 11:59:00 AM (view original):
Posted by vandydave on 11/16/2010 10:22:00 AM (view original):
Posted by jwelsh1023 on 11/16/2010 10:17:00 AM (view original):
Posted by AlCheez on 11/16/2010 10:08:00 AM (view original):
VD won the deal, no question, but we've let worse go through without even a mention.

Like I said, I get the veto, I just don't get why it came now. I think Briese takes TJ Peters too siriusly.
In all honesty, I wouldn't have looked at it had briese not made a stink.  But I didn't veto because of briese.

this trade does not threaten the integrity of the league, nor is it a vet owner stealing from a noob owner. its two owners who traded probably 20+ offers back and forth before finding a deal. if we are going to veto deals where one team gets the better side in public opinion then probably 75% of deals need to be vetoed from here on out.

and Briese has become high and mighty on his success, but does take Peters too siriusly, that guy is one injury from his career being done.

I don't understand high an mighty on success at all. My playoff success in Shtickless and HR is basically nil. Maybe I do take TJ Peters too siriusly, but if the deal was between VD and r0b0t, I wouldn't care.
if the exact same deal went thru with different coaches and you wouldnt care then vetoing this deal makes absolutely zero sense. who anointed you the caregiver for coaches who you feel need your special parenting? you already commish another league, feel free to be heavy handed and self-righteous there.
11/16/2010 1:27 PM
But this is more fun.
11/16/2010 1:35 PM
And Ace is right. The guy is ruining the team. The OF you get back is not just a major leaguer, but would be the best hitter on my team. And that is in the name of a salary dump.
11/16/2010 1:38 PM
â—‚ Prev 1...1197|1198|1199|1200|1201...1824 Next â–¸
Shtickless - Unless Being Dead Is A Shtick Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.