Really, taking all the undecided is so wild that it would take drugs to make you imagine it?

Yes.

Posted by seamar_116 on 9/15/2012 2:33:00 AM (view original):

NORTH CAROLINA (Rasmussen): Obama d. Romney (51-45)

VIRGINIA (Rasmussen): Obama d. Romney (49-48)


Any way Romney wins if he loses North Carolina?   And this is the RASMUSSEN poll!

You've got the numbers mixed up on NC.  Romney is up 6.  And Obama is not even spending any money in the state.

Dems, you might want to start preparing for defeat:

CBS poll ( www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57513408/poll-obama-has-foreign-policy-advantage/ ), shows Obama up only 3, 49 to 46 (p.1).  So what is the sample:  43% Ind, 35% Dem, 22% Repub.  HA, HA, HA,HAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!

CBS has to poll 13% more Dems than Repubs in order to get Obama to be up by 3%.  Just fantastic.  I can't wait to hear Dems claiming the election of Romney is bogus because all the polls said Obama was winning.

Obama is still looking like a strong favorite for re-election. 538 has him at a 75% chance. The popular vote will be close but Obama is going to run away with the electoral college.

Posted by bad_luck on 9/17/2012 12:17:00 PM (view original):
Obama is still looking like a strong favorite for re-election. 538 has him at a 75% chance. The popular vote will be close but Obama is going to run away with the electoral college.

In reality that has NEVER happened.

And I do not think it will happen this year.

It is possible that an Obama 2000 like win might happen, but I cannot see a scenario where Romney wins the pop and the Elec goes wildly for Obama

When I say close, I mean within 4 or 5 percentage points. The electoral college will be something like 305 - 233 Obama.

That is almost the 2008 results.

There is no way that Obama could sustain that.

The 2008 election was a much bigger margin of victory, something like 370 to 160. 305 electoral votes for Obama is a very real possibility this year.

I think the most interesting scenario would be a 269-269 tie.

The House would probably be Republican and would elect Romney.

Would the left accept this, or would they start calling it a "Stolen election" like they keep calling 2000.

The left needs anger, hate and division to maintain their political power.

Posted by nickbracco on 9/18/2012 7:54:00 PM (view original):
swamp...it is not who votes in an election...it is who counts the votes that matters.

And for the most part the people that counted in 2000 counted in 2008 and will count this year.

Posted by swamphawk22 on 9/18/2012 7:34:00 PM (view original):
I think the most interesting scenario would be a 269-269 tie.

The House would probably be Republican and would elect Romney.

Would the left accept this, or would they start calling it a "Stolen election" like they keep calling 2000.

The left needs anger, hate and division to maintain their political power.

Not only did you spell "right" wrong, you spelled it, "left." Dyslexia?

The scenarios I see for a 269-269 electoral college require Nevada going red. That's just not going to happen.

Posted by genghisxcon on 9/18/2012 10:55:00 PM (view original):

Posted by swamphawk22 on 9/18/2012 7:34:00 PM (view original):
I think the most interesting scenario would be a 269-269 tie.

The House would probably be Republican and would elect Romney.

Would the left accept this, or would they start calling it a "Stolen election" like they keep calling 2000.

The left needs anger, hate and division to maintain their political power.

Not only did you spell "right" wrong, you spelled it, "left." Dyslexia?

So you are saying that the left has not been lying about the 2000 election for 12 years.