Capital Athletic Conference: Year 12-pres Topic

I'll look at my individual predictions later:

Quote: Originally Posted By andrewfrance on 4/30/2006



Quick conference preview:
North winner: Catholic Correct!
South winner: York (Edging Hood) Correct! (and Correct!)
Dancers: Catholic (3), York (8), Salisbury (16/PIT), Goucher (PIT)
Marymount could slide in; I haven't looked at schedules to see if anyone crippled their SOS so much that they can't get their RPI high enough. (Catholic as a 2, York a 6, Salisbury, Goucher out, Marymount as a 9! Hood was a barely miss for the PIT. Goucher really hurt themselves with a bad SOS. )
6/3/2006 1:05 PM
Nice job on the predictions andrew. As always, I look forward to reading them and seeing the results.
6/3/2006 10:15 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By andrewfrance on 6/03/2006
I'll look at my individual predictions later:

Quote: Originally Posted By andrewfrance on 4/30/2006




Quick conference preview:
North winner: Catholic Correct!
South winner: York (Edging Hood) Correct! (and Correct!)
Dancers: Catholic (3), York (8), Salisbury (16/PIT), Goucher (PIT)
Marymount could slide in; I haven't looked at schedules to see if anyone crippled their SOS so much that they can't get their RPI high enough. (Catholic as a 2, York a 6, Salisbury, Goucher out, Marymount as a 9! Hood was a barely miss for the PIT. Goucher really hurt themselves with a bad SOS. )
Yes and Salisbury not even close!!!!!!!!
6/3/2006 11:44 PM
POY: Tosh (Marymount) edging Locklear (Hood) Tosh was HM, Locklear 2nd team. Kasper was a deserving MVP, but I thought Turner was the most important player in the conference.
COY: andrewfrance Wohoo!
ROY: Ridinger (SMM) Yes, and a favorite for MVP in as little as 2 years.
1st team:
PG: "Super" Mario Wright (Catholic); edging preseason All-american HM, Gardner (Salisbury) Wright was 3rd team, Gardner got no love while leading the conference in assists.
SG: Edmonds (Catholic); also preseason All-american HM 3rd Team, but mainly due to minutes; he had a great year. Franklin was 1st team, but as I mentioned, Turner deserves the big ups from the 2 guard
SF: Cooper (Salisbury); was a preseason 3rd team. Yes
PF: Locklear (Hood) 2nd team
C: Harbaugh (York) and Tosh (Marymount) are the class acts in the middle; I'll take Tosh. Both HM, all 3 of the teamers played key roles on good teams. No complaints.
6/6/2006 8:40 PM
bump
6/18/2006 12:33 AM
North Recruiting Summary, Season 16
Salisbury (Sim AI)

J. ThigpenFr.SG465353134271349647443B-403
J. RodmanFr.SG33203625407202417684855B-393
N. RoeFr.SF211612493228224341682438B-394
W. PageFr.C241724402152661250636330B462
Good D ratings, got the long-term rebounding help they needed.They are staring at some TOs due to deficient P/BH.

6/22/2006 9:01 AM

Catholic

R. CampbellFr.SG2938484672114374765346C464
J. BennettFr.C2961635435051145695168C-464
This is the best small class I’ve ever landed.It really couldn’t have worked out much better.Bennett was 350ish away, but I landed him with no promises.This class gives me hope that next year’s rebuilding won’t be too painful.Campbell’s D rating makes him the odds on favorite to break Robbie Keith’s career steals mark at CUA.



Gallaudet

None



Mary Washington (Sim AI)

None

6/22/2006 9:03 AM

Marymount

D. ChenFr.SG2834946411484418727163B-448
R. BarelaFr.SF352620254533113231697456D+457
A new, veteran owner lands a nice class here.Chen can’t pass, but will fill it up and can D up.Barela is the SF I would have wanted if I had a spot for one.Lots of upside to him, particularly.Both are good DEF guys and have solid WE’s.That’s a bonus.A good long-term lesson on the value of WE can be seen in my senior class.Crews, Meaney, Peterson, and Ennis all entered with almost exactly the same total ratings.Look where they are now.
6/22/2006 9:04 AM
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
6/22/2006 9:04 AM
R. WashingtonFr.C301029853939649597550C-399
It’s a good thing this team plays a zone.This class has some offensive merit, but, man, they are terrible on D.Pinkham’s an interesting SF.I think I’d try to make him into a SG/PG given his ratings, but he’s in a class with 3 other SG’s.On the positive side, there are some solid WE’s here to build with.
6/22/2006 9:05 AM
what happen to cowgirl?
6/23/2006 11:33 PM
Villa Julia

None



Baptist Bible

T. HerzigFr.PF1697153128542137716954B412
R. BurnsFr.C2896263239582238456858F429
Burns is decent.He’ll be a solid contributor,Herzig is a poor man’s Burns.Burns will need a nice offseason boost early to be a good rebounder ever, but the odds are decent.Decent defenders.Wolfe also gets to decide if he wants to work on the PE of either.

6/24/2006 7:23 AM


Chestnut Hill

W. DavidFr.PG5259404617112912765563C+451
J. JenkinsFr.SG3652314242141358684462B+435
M. BracewellFr.PF232918283650271464611755D+422
This is a really good class from a lousy Sim AI.Boo!David will be able to score in bunches his SR. year, Bracewell will probably be the best post guy as a senior.Lousy Sim AI.
6/24/2006 7:24 AM
York (PA)

C. RyderFr.PG2044584343101341729464B-484
S. StarksFr.SG38284729293311511803879D+464
The highest rated duo in the conference.I love Starks.He took a redshirt which makes him an odds on favorite for a 700 rating and 20ppg 4 seasons from now.Ryder’s nice and a better D guy.This deserved the props Collegiate Insider gave it.



St Mary’s

D. TyrellFr.SG36402123511466697956D-383
After Otis’ big recruiting splash last year, Tyrell is merely a wimper.He’ll never play.I’d rather have the spot and extra $ for next season.
6/24/2006 7:24 AM
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
6/24/2006 7:25 AM
◂ Prev 1...11|12|13|14|15...84 Next ▸
Capital Athletic Conference: Year 12-pres Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.