Posted by dino27 on 12/27/2017 1:44:00 AM (view original):
if an elite generic spy is doing research with deep connections on a wide variety of stories..some of which depend upon 2nd hand info.....how can his report be expected to be 100 % correct.and who has a right to demand that.....if it is 80% correct does the 80% true magically become false ? because it is inconvenient.........does anyone here believe that the jury was justified in finding oj simpson not guilty..even innocent because mark furman said a few racial things.
have we lost our minds.
christopher steel is the most respected british spy against russia alive......he cant be soiled by western communists.....or by people who have learned to walk on their heads......by politicians reviving the mccarthyites.......at least the joe mccarthy gang were just evil paranoid shizos......they were not in league with a like minded president like the one we have who is at worst a traitor and at best a megalomaniac.
I like the Mark Fuhrman analogy. Very apt. In the same way OJ's lawyers used Fuhrman to muddy the waters on that case, Trump and his defenders are doing it with the errors in the dossier and Hillary's connection to it:
"No Prague stamp? Then Trump's the champ!"
"If Hillary paid it, the dossier's degraded!"
Okay, I'm not as good as Johnnie Cochran at this rhymin' lawyer stuff...