2016 Presidential Race Topic

Posted by dahsdebater on 1/15/2016 8:01:00 PM (view original):
But to answer your question directly, yes, it kinda does read that way.

And FWIW, I think restrictions on immigration will have little better than 0% effectiveness.

Because not restricting immigration like Germany and France is working well for them, eh?
1/15/2016 8:36 PM
Posted by DougOut on 1/15/2016 8:35:00 PM (view original):
What percentage of dead murdered slaughtered innocent American citizens beyond 0% is acceptable?
I guess life would be easier if you saw everything in black and white and believed whatever you were told...

Am I willing to sacrifice a few hundred people now to potentially save thousands later?  Yes, if I have to.
1/15/2016 8:39 PM
Posted by moy23 on 1/15/2016 8:36:00 PM (view original):
Posted by dahsdebater on 1/15/2016 8:01:00 PM (view original):
But to answer your question directly, yes, it kinda does read that way.

And FWIW, I think restrictions on immigration will have little better than 0% effectiveness.

Because not restricting immigration like Germany and France is working well for them, eh?
You guys are worried about crime and terrorist acts.

The violent crime rate, now, with refugees, in Germany and France remains far lower than the violent crime rate in the United States.  Germany's is basically in a different stratosphere.

So I'd say it isn't really out working all that badly.  I'm guessing that's not the answer you were looking for?
1/15/2016 8:40 PM
Posted by dahsdebater on 1/15/2016 8:40:00 PM (view original):
Posted by moy23 on 1/15/2016 8:36:00 PM (view original):
Posted by dahsdebater on 1/15/2016 8:01:00 PM (view original):
But to answer your question directly, yes, it kinda does read that way.

And FWIW, I think restrictions on immigration will have little better than 0% effectiveness.

Because not restricting immigration like Germany and France is working well for them, eh?
You guys are worried about crime and terrorist acts.

The violent crime rate, now, with refugees, in Germany and France remains far lower than the violent crime rate in the United States.  Germany's is basically in a different stratosphere.

So I'd say it isn't really out working all that badly.  I'm guessing that's not the answer you were looking for?
No.... I'm just worried about terrorist attacks.... Especially with the increasing trend of occurances around the world and on American soil.
1/15/2016 8:48 PM
Primarily by American citizens.
1/15/2016 8:49 PM
Posted by dahsdebater on 1/15/2016 8:39:00 PM (view original):
Posted by DougOut on 1/15/2016 8:35:00 PM (view original):
What percentage of dead murdered slaughtered innocent American citizens beyond 0% is acceptable?
I guess life would be easier if you saw everything in black and white and believed whatever you were told...

Am I willing to sacrifice a few hundred people now to potentially save thousands later?  Yes, if I have to.
So you don't have my back.  I got yours.  And there you go.

Typical.  It's a one way street with you guys.  

Well guess what?  I'll keep protecting you until you eliminate me. 

After that you're on your own.
1/15/2016 8:50 PM
You think you have my back.  In reality, you're just setting booby traps for my kids and my grandkids.  I can see why someone might try to eliminate you for that.
1/15/2016 8:58 PM
And seriously, any "I've got your back" rhetoric from a Rush adherent like yourself is laughable.

You've got my back unless I lose my job.  Or develop a debilitating medical condition.  In those cases I'm on my own.
1/15/2016 9:00 PM
Posted by dahsdebater on 1/15/2016 8:58:00 PM (view original):
You think you have my back.  In reality, you're just setting booby traps for my kids and my grandkids.  I can see why someone might try to eliminate you for that.
Ouch!
1/15/2016 9:07 PM
Posted by dahsdebater on 1/15/2016 9:00:00 PM (view original):
And seriously, any "I've got your back" rhetoric from a Rush adherent like yourself is laughable.

You've got my back unless I lose my job.  Or develop a debilitating medical condition.  In those cases I'm on my own.
This is sad.  From the reach across the aisle crowd.  It appears you have no  desire to practice what you preach.  

After all, we are laughable.  The very possibility of acknowledging one citizen and his views, excludes us from the human race or at least your narrow definition of humanity.  

It's the only thing that makes sense to me.  It's the only possible justification for your unwarranted diatribe.  

Somehow in your mind, there is a sizable portion of the citizenry who want you to lose your job or celibrate failing health.  

Somebody or something poisoned your mind and your heart.

It wasn't Rush Limbaugh.  How would you know?  You never listen to him.  
1/15/2016 9:27 PM
I hope you're intentionally being a dumbass.  Nobody said any sane person wants anyone to lose their job or get sick.

Rush, and I'm guessing you, likes to label people who want the government to help the unemployed or the chronically ill as bleeding-heart liberals, if not socialists.  Which are certainly implied to be negative traits.  FWIW, I'm not big on government unemployment /welfare either, and I'd like to see the healthcare entitlements shrink.  But I'm not claiming to "have your back."
1/15/2016 9:33 PM
Posted by dahsdebater on 1/15/2016 9:33:00 PM (view original):
I hope you're intentionally being a dumbass.  Nobody said any sane person wants anyone to lose their job or get sick.

Rush, and I'm guessing you, likes to label people who want the government to help the unemployed or the chronically ill as bleeding-heart liberals, if not socialists.  Which are certainly implied to be negative traits.  FWIW, I'm not big on government unemployment /welfare either, and I'd like to see the healthcare entitlements shrink.  But I'm not claiming to "have your back."
I hope you're intentionally being a dumbass.  You're guessing?  Yes.  Yes you are. You guessed wrong. 
1/15/2016 9:55 PM
So, to clarify, you don't want to reduce the size of the federal entitlement programs?
1/15/2016 11:10 PM
Posted by dahsdebater on 1/15/2016 8:49:00 PM (view original):
Primarily by American citizens.
How many refugees has America taken in from the middle east compared to Germany, or France? It's no wonder these European countries have more attacks like the Paris Attacks, Cologne, etc when America is just starting to have attacks like San Bernardino. I think saw Germany alone has brought in 1.1 million refugees.... Now they have rioting in the streets because of it.
1/15/2016 11:13 PM
Who ******* cares get over it for cryin out loud
1/15/2016 11:34 PM
◂ Prev 1...129|130|131|132|133...575 Next ▸
2016 Presidential Race Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.