The Mad Scientist Top 25 Ranking Debate Topic

zhawks
Posts: 881 (0)
Hall of Famer
208 66 38
Pro
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
12/21/2009 4:46 PM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By vandydave on 12/21/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/21/2009
You don't understand my concept, but I'm digging the grave, nice. Accept the fact that you don't understand what I'm trying to tell you.
i understand that you dont get it
Yeah I do, you think you caught me in a lie/double talk, I explain it away and you still claim victory...I've seen your type here and I'm used to it...worthless for debate purposes.
12/21/2009 4:47 PM
Weena
Posts: 579 (0)
Hall of Famer
227 1 1 1 531 1 27
Rookie
One thing is for sure and that is that scheduling will become even more important. If a team wants to get a decent seed (or even make the NT) then the coach has to schedule smartly. No more of these 20+ wins vs 220 SOS cupcakes getting in.
12/21/2009 4:47 PM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
12/21/2009 4:48 PM
arssanguinus
Posts: 1120 (0)
Hall of Famer
282 1
Pro
You can argue that. You would be wrong, but you could argue it.
12/21/2009 4:50 PM
zhawks
Posts: 881 (0)
Hall of Famer
208 66 38
Pro
Quote: Originally Posted By Weena on 12/21/2009One thing is for sure and that is that scheduling will become even more important. If a team wants to get a decent seed (or even make the NT) then the coach has to schedule smartly. No more of these 20+ wins vs 220 SOS cupcakes getting in
Yeah I don't like it for that reason alone - What if you schedule Duke and Florida State and both get destroyed in recruiting? That would ripple through the world.
12/21/2009 4:50 PM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 12/21/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/21/2009
Uhhhh, not really....do you recruit guys based off of their HS Win-Loss, their HS Stats, or their ratings? Also, I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone that would say an overall rating minus WE-ST-DU like zhawks suggested would be the best overall rating out there.
I never said such a thing. That would be closer then the number you tried to play off on us but still not the best way to judge any given player.

Also would you use LP for a guard then in your overall ranking of a player?

You brought it up, did you not? I thought it was a good idea after you suggested...you brought it up.

LP for a guard is just like PE for a center...virtually insignificant...why would you want to eliminate those numbers from an overall rating, they still have a direct impact in the game?
12/21/2009 4:51 PM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By Weena on 12/21/2009One thing is for sure and that is that scheduling will become even more important. If a team wants to get a decent seed (or even make the NT) then the coach has to schedule smartly. No more of these 20+ wins vs 220 SOS cupcakes getting in
Now here's a guy FINALLY, with some sense....bravo!
12/21/2009 4:51 PM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By arssanguinus on 12/21/2009You can argue that. You would be wrong, but you could argue it.
That's all you got? Lol, move along, you're done obviously. I defeated everything you said.
12/21/2009 4:52 PM
zhawks
Posts: 881 (0)
Hall of Famer
208 66 38
Pro
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/21/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 12/21/2009

Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/21/2009
Uhhhh, not really....do you recruit guys based off of their HS Win-Loss, their HS Stats, or their ratings? Also, I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone that would say an overall rating minus WE-ST-DU like zhawks suggested would be the best overall rating out there.
I never said such a thing. That would be closer then the number you tried to play off on us but still not the best way to judge any given player.

Also would you use LP for a guard then in your overall ranking of a player?

You brought it up, did you not? I thought it was a good idea after you suggested...you brought it up.

LP for a guard is just like PE for a center...virtually insignificant...why would you want to eliminate those numbers from an overall rating, they still have a direct impact in the game?

Thank you for proving your lack of knowledge in the game on many levels.
12/21/2009 4:52 PM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
If WIS would forward me the data from one world, I would be more than happy to compile a ranking (probably 3 different ones) and show you what I've got.
12/21/2009 4:53 PM
arssanguinus
Posts: 1120 (0)
Hall of Famer
282 1
Pro
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
12/21/2009 4:54 PM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 12/21/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/21/2009

You brought it up, did you not? I thought it was a good idea after you suggested...you brought it up.

LP for a guard is just like PE for a center...virtually insignificant...why would you want to eliminate those numbers from an overall rating, they still have a direct impact in the game?

Thank you for proving your lack of knowledge in the game on many levels


You can have a successful guard that has a low LP and you can have a successful center that has a low PE. I know you probably haven't played in the lower divisions in a while, but would the guard be as successful if he had a low PE as opposed to a low LP....a center with a low LP as opposed to a low PE?
12/21/2009 4:55 PM
arssanguinus
Posts: 1120 (0)
Hall of Famer
282 1
Pro
"Akll parts of a car's engine are virtually interdependent, therefore the relative quality of any one part is no more important than the relative quality of any other part"
12/21/2009 4:56 PM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
12/21/2009 4:56 PM
◂ Prev 1...12|13|14|15|16...75 Next ▸
The Mad Scientist Top 25 Ranking Debate Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.