Posted by r0b0t on 2/23/2011 2:18:00 PM (view original):
Posted by AceCards on 2/23/2011 1:42:00 PM (view original):
I had to veto that trade, I cannot let mink get raped by a teamowner in my division.
Eh, Fitzgerald is in a contract year. So he's getting a few guys to his liking now instead of whatever the comp picks would be next year... And I'm guessing he wanted to save some money.
Coyote still wins, but it's not vetoable.
Well, we have no clue if he is willing to resign and also likely a contender with prospects would have given him a good player in return.
I am not saying coyote should have paid the farm... Â mink should have gotten at least one ML player in return. Â Not getting at least one of those is inexcusable.