you can blame luongo if you want randle, but he stole three friggin games out of the seven. the fact that the canucks only scored eight goals in seven games was the reason you lost. your offense should be able to win at least one friggin' game for ya in a seven game series. two of the four losses had nothing to do with luongo, but the guys in front of him. one of those being the eight goal game. the other being game seven. thomas would have lost game seven for the canucks because they just didn't play like they wanted to win. especially in their own zone. you talk about luongo choking, well thomas let in five goals three times against tampa, and the only reason they won the series was because boston's offense was able to score six in one of those games.
and as for trading luongo, if the canucks did that, their window would be gone. schneider can't step up and take the canucks to the stanley cup. yeah he's played great as a backup to a vezina candidate in twenty to twenty-five regular season games, half of which were probably against bottom dwellers, but if he was actually given the starting role, it would likely take him two or three years to get him game on. he will be a great starter, but i don't think it's right now. and it may not even happen. sometimes the potential never really shows up. the canucks still have a great team and can still go for a cup right now, if they can fill their holes. get a big center to play in front of the net, and either get some new d-men, or else get them to start playing like they want to win (i'm looking at you bieksa and salo!). and IMO, in order to go to the cup again next year, they need luongo. i don't think schneider can do it. and he becomes an RFA at the end of the year and will want more money. they have two options. keep him around to appease the fans who have no faith in luongo and let someone give him an offer sheet next july taking a couple draft picks in return, or else they can trade him now and maybe get something that will give them that edge that they are lacking. :>