Quote: Originally Posted By arssanguinus on 12/21/2009Fallacious argument there. YOur position has absolutely nothing to make it a default over any other position. Burden of proof only applies if something is a widely accepted truth that has been proven through repreated testing. SHow me that hard to dispute data of your own?
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/21/2009Quote: Originally Posted By vandydave on 12/21/2009Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/21/2009You don't understand my concept, but I'm digging the grave, nice. Accept the fact that you don't understand what I'm trying to tell you.i understand that you dont get it.Yeah I do, you think you caught me in a lie/double talk, I explain it away and you still claim victory...I've seen your type here and I'm used to it...worthless for debate purposes
Quote: Originally Posted By vandydave on 12/21/2009Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/21/2009You don't understand my concept, but I'm digging the grave, nice. Accept the fact that you don't understand what I'm trying to tell you.i understand that you dont get it.
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/21/2009You don't understand my concept, but I'm digging the grave, nice. Accept the fact that you don't understand what I'm trying to tell you.
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/21/2009Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 12/21/2009Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/21/2009You brought it up, did you not? I thought it was a good idea after you suggested...you brought it up.LP for a guard is just like PE for a center...virtually insignificant...why would you want to eliminate those numbers from an overall rating, they still have a direct impact in the game?Thank you for proving your lack of knowledge in the game on many levels.You can have a successful guard that has a low LP and you can have a successful center that has a low PE. I know you probably haven't played in the lower divisions in a while, but would the guard be as successful if he had a low PE as opposed to a low LP....a center with a low LP as opposed to a low PE?Want to know why?
Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 12/21/2009Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/21/2009You brought it up, did you not? I thought it was a good idea after you suggested...you brought it up.LP for a guard is just like PE for a center...virtually insignificant...why would you want to eliminate those numbers from an overall rating, they still have a direct impact in the game?Thank you for proving your lack of knowledge in the game on many levels.You can have a successful guard that has a low LP and you can have a successful center that has a low PE. I know you probably haven't played in the lower divisions in a while, but would the guard be as successful if he had a low PE as opposed to a low LP....a center with a low LP as opposed to a low PE?
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/21/2009You brought it up, did you not? I thought it was a good idea after you suggested...you brought it up.LP for a guard is just like PE for a center...virtually insignificant...why would you want to eliminate those numbers from an overall rating, they still have a direct impact in the game?
Quote: Originally Posted By vandydave on 12/21/2009Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/21/2009Quote: Originally Posted By vandydave on 12/21/2009Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/21/2009You don't understand my concept, but I'm digging the grave, nice. Accept the fact that you don't understand what I'm trying to tell you.i understand that you dont get it.Yeah I do, you think you caught me in a lie/double talk, I explain it away and you still claim victory...I've seen your type here and I'm used to it...worthless for debate purposes.you explained nothing away. im used to your type as well, the type who is ignorant and unaware
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/21/2009Quote: Originally Posted By vandydave on 12/21/2009Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/21/2009You don't understand my concept, but I'm digging the grave, nice. Accept the fact that you don't understand what I'm trying to tell you.i understand that you dont get it.Yeah I do, you think you caught me in a lie/double talk, I explain it away and you still claim victory...I've seen your type here and I'm used to it...worthless for debate purposes.
Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 12/21/2009Want to know whyIs this what you guys do, answer questions with questions ad nauseum?
Quote: Originally Posted By arssanguinus on 12/21/2009You said they were effectively equal. That is not saying they're EXACTLY equal, like you said I said...thank you for libeling me and admitting to it no less.......... And I would wager you cou;ld not find all that many coaches who would agree with you. Where the numbers are distributed, who has them, which combination of numbers is where. . all matters. Then explain it dude, I'm giving you the opportunity time and time again, and you're pussing out...how EXACTLY am I supposed to be the bad guy here? Own up to your statements...or can't you.You are trying to claim everyone else has the burden of proof. .when YOU are the one that is pushing the theory that is at odds with conventional wisdom> YOu fail at understanding logical fallacies forever. I'm saying all categories less WE-ST-DU practically equally because they're basically all interdependent of one another. Is that wrong? If so, put your com theory textbook away and prove it...burden of proof is on you...has been and still is.
Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement
© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.