Lets debate! Topic

Bingo
3/1/2019 6:08 PM
Posted by wylie715 on 3/1/2019 6:04:00 PM (view original):
I didn't get really upset. It was just a very stupid comment. Just as stupid as BL's "anyone who voted for trump is an idiot"
That was one. How many has bl made and I retracted mine and he still reiterates his. See the difference?
3/1/2019 6:10 PM
Posted by wylie715 on 3/1/2019 4:33:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 3/1/2019 3:07:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tangplay on 3/1/2019 3:03:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 3/1/2019 3:00:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tangplay on 3/1/2019 2:55:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 3/1/2019 2:49:00 PM (view original):
I said that? LOL find that post. You lying again, tang. Just say no to drugs.

Oh and Bill Gates also agrees she is dumb.

http://fortune.com/2019/02/12/bill-gates-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-tax-plan/

You definitely did, I will search for it when I have time. I don't do drugs.

Btw, you ALSO consistently call Jews who voted democrat 'traitors'.
That part is true. The other part you made up. Liar.
You mentioned someone being a never Trumper so they aren't a real conservative.

Either way, you are a massive hypocrite.
NEVER said that either. You're confusing me with someone else. Either find the real post or stop your nonsense.

LMAO.

Look, Tlaib and Omar are open antisemites. Your party elected them and you support them. The rest is noise.
yeah, and we all know that there isn't one antisemite in the Republican party. What makes you think tangplay or I support Omar or Tlaib? Just because they are democrats and we are too? Does that mean you support every single Republican? I doubt it. I din't vote for either of them, don't know anything about that and don't support them.
With all due respect, you may vote democrat, but based on most of your posts you're libertarian in principle.
3/1/2019 6:13 PM
Posted by strikeout26 on 3/1/2019 6:05:00 PM (view original):
Posted by laramiebob on 3/1/2019 2:22:00 PM (view original):
That's crazy talk Coach. You have NO F'n idea whether she's bright or a moron. ALL you know is what you've had "reported" to you.
When you have met her personally and had a chance to actually gauge her mind BASED on reasonable interaction, THEN you'll be able to opine on this congressperson's relative level of intelligence. Until then you're just revealing yourself to be extremely biased on AOC.
With all due respect, this is completely wrong. We judge people's intelligence all the time that we have never spoke with. I'm pretty sure you have made plenty of comments regarding Trump's intelligence. You have probably never met the guy. You have the right to use the information available to you to form that opinion.It is part of every election. We vote for those who agree with us ideologically, but we also gauge intelligence. This is also part of the hiring process. When I am looking at applications, I am using the data available to gauge competence.

As far as the "reported" part, she does a televised interview at least once a week. I don't need a reporter to tell me how to think. I can form my own opinions.
Yes you can. And as a human you can be wrong. And assuming you know somebody's intelligence based on (edited portions of) TV interviews is.......... well, you know what you do when you assume I'm pretty sure. And I'm not intending to claim she's unusually bright. But I did witness her performance (questioning) for 5 minutes the other day. She was far more competent than many. Not sure what that says about the "others".
3/1/2019 6:26 PM
Scripted
3/1/2019 6:36 PM
Posted by laramiebob on 3/1/2019 6:26:00 PM (view original):
Posted by strikeout26 on 3/1/2019 6:05:00 PM (view original):
Posted by laramiebob on 3/1/2019 2:22:00 PM (view original):
That's crazy talk Coach. You have NO F'n idea whether she's bright or a moron. ALL you know is what you've had "reported" to you.
When you have met her personally and had a chance to actually gauge her mind BASED on reasonable interaction, THEN you'll be able to opine on this congressperson's relative level of intelligence. Until then you're just revealing yourself to be extremely biased on AOC.
With all due respect, this is completely wrong. We judge people's intelligence all the time that we have never spoke with. I'm pretty sure you have made plenty of comments regarding Trump's intelligence. You have probably never met the guy. You have the right to use the information available to you to form that opinion.It is part of every election. We vote for those who agree with us ideologically, but we also gauge intelligence. This is also part of the hiring process. When I am looking at applications, I am using the data available to gauge competence.

As far as the "reported" part, she does a televised interview at least once a week. I don't need a reporter to tell me how to think. I can form my own opinions.
Yes you can. And as a human you can be wrong. And assuming you know somebody's intelligence based on (edited portions of) TV interviews is.......... well, you know what you do when you assume I'm pretty sure. And I'm not intending to claim she's unusually bright. But I did witness her performance (questioning) for 5 minutes the other day. She was far more competent than many. Not sure what that says about the "others".
For sure I can be wrong about this, but the interviews aren't edited when she's on late night tv and many other venues. As I said, we have to assume someone's competence when they are running for/ are in office. We can only use the data supplied.

I have even hypothesized that she is not as dumb as she appears, but is a deceitful person. Honestly, I'm okay with dumb. That can't be helped. Deceit is a sign of low class.
3/1/2019 6:59 PM
Posted by wylie715 on 3/1/2019 6:04:00 PM (view original):
I didn't get really upset. It was just a very stupid comment. Just as stupid as BL's "anyone who voted for trump is an idiot"
Or “all politicians are only out for themselves.”
3/1/2019 7:04 PM
Posted by cccp1014 on 3/1/2019 4:39:00 PM (view original):
Posted by wylie715 on 3/1/2019 4:36:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 3/1/2019 4:29:00 PM (view original):
Posted by wylie715 on 3/1/2019 4:28:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 3/1/2019 2:39:00 PM (view original):
Bob, with all due respect and I mean with all due respect. I think bad luck is dumb.

much the same way he thinks anyone who voted for Trump is an idiot.
He thinks 63mil are dumb. I just think he is.
no, you think tangplay is , you think AOC is, you think BL is, you think rsp77 is, you think rcbracco is. Isn't it odd that they all disagree with your point of view. You've also called me an idiot when I disagreed with you.
#1) Tang = yes
#2) AOC = based on what I have seen and heard. Yes.
#3) rsp = never called him dumb. I don't think he is a good guy though.
#4) braccpo = see rsp

You don't think Bracco, of all people, is dumb?
3/1/2019 9:27 PM
Posted by all3 on 3/1/2019 4:40:00 PM (view original):
Posted by strikeout26 on 3/1/2019 1:55:00 PM (view original):
Also, it's pretty sad that the party has went so far left that they don't believe in the ability to think for oneself. If you don't do exactly as Pelosi or AOC says, you aren't "part of the team." That's pathetic.

Its the same as with their identity politics game. If you don't vote democrat, you're not a real "black" or "Hispanic" or you're a "traitor to women." It's pathetic and bigoted.
Post of the Day.
H y p o c r i t e
3/1/2019 9:29 PM
Me?
3/1/2019 9:53 PM
no. Your point was great.
3/1/2019 10:00 PM
Tang is a failed journalist who went to college to “have some fun”. His KC Chiefs choked in the playoffs.
3/1/2019 11:29 PM
Posted by cccp1014 on 3/1/2019 11:29:00 PM (view original):
Tang is a failed journalist who went to college to “have some fun”. His KC Chiefs choked in the playoffs.

Tang is a failed journalist

Yet I still have a job.

who went to college to “have some fun”

... and had two priorities before that.

His KC Chiefs choked in the playoffs.

Just the defense. We are fixing that this offseason, and we will be in the Super Bowl next year. Clark Hunt provides stability to the team. How's your owner doing?

3/1/2019 11:50 PM
Posted by tangplay on 3/1/2019 9:29:00 PM (view original):
Posted by all3 on 3/1/2019 4:40:00 PM (view original):
Posted by strikeout26 on 3/1/2019 1:55:00 PM (view original):
Also, it's pretty sad that the party has went so far left that they don't believe in the ability to think for oneself. If you don't do exactly as Pelosi or AOC says, you aren't "part of the team." That's pathetic.

Its the same as with their identity politics game. If you don't vote democrat, you're not a real "black" or "Hispanic" or you're a "traitor to women." It's pathetic and bigoted.
Post of the Day.
H y p o c r i t e
This again shows why I don't bother reading tang's posts either. I was alerted he was calling me names, for no reason whatsoever, so thought I'd better make him happy and address him.

tang, PLEASE. PLEASE, PLEASE explain HTH me saying stikeout's post was Post of the Day, is in any way hypocritical. Do you maybe not know what the word means? I have NEVER even remotely hinted that anyone isn't a "real" anything, other than a certain someone who was claiming to be Native American. I promise to actually read (and I'm sure get further frustrated by) your next post (and only your next post - so make it "good").

I have admittedly asked what % of lineage makes someone "black", "hispanic", or whatever, but have never gotten a response. That's not even close.
3/2/2019 8:41 AM (edited)
Hypocrite is a word tang recently learned.
3/2/2019 10:53 AM
◂ Prev 1...148|149|150|151|152...229 Next ▸
Lets debate! Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.