moy, you could look at it from another perspective too.
The Hawks were a top-10 team in goal differential, and 4th in goals scored last season with only Vancouver, Detroit and Philadelphia in front of them. They did that with missing Hossa (17), Bolland (21), Kane (9), Campbell (17) and a 3rd d pairing (started the season with Boynton/Hendry/Scott). Granted every team has injuries, but you can't say the Hawks were one of the healthier teams in the league either. Taking a team that was a top-5 team in every offensive category, subtracting Kopecky and Brouwer and adding Frolik, Campoli and Olesz and more experience for Bickell, Stalberg, Smith, Kruger and Leddy makes them as good, if not better from an offensive point of view.
Defensively is where the team lacked, not showing any intensity in their own zone most nights and having a non-existant PK. Steve Montador helps in both those regards as he's a physical upgrade over Campbell. Keith and Hjalmarsson being better also will help. I don't disagree they need one more depth defenseman, but I think their top 4 will be fine the way it is.
As for goaltending, I don't think many people will argue that Crawford playing 60-65 games is better than ANY games from Marty Turco. Salak is afcorse a wild card so we'll have to wait and see.
As it stands I think the team is better than it was last season. the simple fact that Fro, Campoli, Leddy and Stalberg played a full season with the team is already a better start than having 11 new faces at camp who have no chemistry.
Of course I will reserve judgement as to how much better they are until Stan is done. I'll let you know Monday :-P