Ah yes, duly noted.

A little slow on the uptake, huh?

Is that two posts that cactus will have removed?

Mostly depends on Threadmaster Sergei, does it not?

You may.
It will.
Most likely.

He's not right when one comment, where you said he was right, is being rescinded. 

That is not a question.

It should.

Also not a question.

Dumber than dirt.

It is.

Not mostly.  Entirely.

Ahh, so, basically, iain has hedged his bets to be right no matter which point proves to be true?

Shouldn't this disqualify him from either post being right?

Pretty much.

iain is the only person on earth who can have both choices in a coin flip and still get it wrong.

It's sophistry when a person will argue either side of the question, but what is it when a person is only able to make wrong arguments on both sides of a question?

Stupidity.

Two UW-Stout hockey players got into a bar fight and basically killed a guy. They've been kicked off the hockey team. Harsh?

Probably not because of the outcome of the fight.  But the objective of a fight is to hit the other person hard enough or long enough so they can't hit you back.  Seems like they accomplished the goal of the fight.

And hockey is all about fighting, am I right?

The ability to knock people the F out seems like a good thing in hockey.   I was at a bar one time(well, a bunch of times but that's not relevant to the story) and one of the local minor league hockey players was there.  He wasn't one of the big guys(maybe 5'10", 180 lbs), certainly not an enforcer.  An altercation took place. He dropped a couple of dudes in a matter of seconds.   I decided I'd never fight a hockey player unless he was already beating the snot out of me.  And, judging from what I saw, I'd already be out by the time I decided I better fight back.

In Coop, am I at 60 and need 65, or is this my first year? I'm good with either.