Quote: Originally Posted By doomey on 4/26/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 4/26/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By gillispie1 on 4/26/2010
colonels, your response to daalter just proves how you have completely thrown away logic and reason and only care about being right. C- hca is absolutely not a wash. and do the math on the chance of you crappy FT shooting team shooting 42% or less. seriously. do it. it is supremely unimpressive. you are just trying to defend your point because you feel is right, you are not trying to give logical responses to logical points.

Worse teams than mine killed them, thus I should have done the same, if not better...tell me why i should think otherwise.

Because you can't use other teams to justify your own results. They are a differant team, have differant settings, ratings and IQ's? Just a thought.

You keep harping on the fact that it was a sim. Say it was a human who ran those exact same settings. What would be the differance? You already said you were ok with losing to humans who were rated lower. The point being, once the game starts, it doesn't matter who is coaching, it matters how they set the team up beforehand. You didn't, neither did the sim (who could be any novice coach out there).

Quote: Originally Posted By metsmax on 4/26/2010
In the midst of a whole lot of stuff that isnt all that amusing, this post made me smile.

In effect, by deciding NOT to game plan you converted this game from human v SIM into SIM v SIM.....or even worse, you may - we dont know - have some settings - distros, etc - that human review would suggest were negative for this matchup. This ended up being the equivalent of machine v machine.....John Conner would be proud....

I most certainly set my gameplan, distros, etc, thus there's nothing sim about me. I had a gameplan that was more than enough to win that game EASILY, period. Look what West Georgia did....look at what the 2 other sims did.

Quote: Originally Posted By arssanguinus on 4/26/2010Look at what you did. Evidently it was not.

Quote: Originally Posted By piratesfan23 on 4/26/2010Colonels you should sign up for a season in wooden d3 , NAC is tough conference to test your coaching skills. Mt Ida is open those guys could help you out with distros , recruiting to help you out with your d2 team. If you can win in wooden d3 especially the NAC then you should be able to roll thru d2

Quote: Originally posted by colonels19 on 4/26/2010Like it or not, that game had W written all over it, and the sim engine stole it from me....just an utter friggin shame...

Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 4/26/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By doomey on 4/26/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 4/26/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By gillispie1 on 4/26/2010

Originally posted by ME:

Because you can't use other teams to justify your own results. They are a differant team, have differant settings, ratings and IQ's? Just a thought. Yeah and here's a thought, my team is considerably better than the team that beat the **** out of Montevallo (Flat out wrong, subtract his walkons and you are equal at best and he has much better defensive IQ's)...and since Team Talent is the most important thing in this game (Again wrong. it is a game of individual matchups as well, probably moreso when running anything but zone), there should have been no way that I lost that game (AGAIN wrong. You were favored, nothing more).

You keep harping on the fact that it was a sim. Say it was a human who ran those exact same settings. What would be the differance? You already said you were ok with losing to humans who were rated lower. Its always more justifiable losing to a human than a sim (According to you. If you gameplanned maybe we wouldn't even be having this conversation, but either way, once the game starts it doesn't matter who is coaching) The point being, once the game starts, it doesn't matter who is coaching, it matters how they set the team up beforehand. You didn't, neither did the sim (who could be any novice coach out there). Ok, let's say that's the case, my team is considerably better, advantage me...I WIN...or not....... (No, advantage to the team that plays the situation correctly, you did not, thus risked a loss)

You were not robbed, you were not gypped, you lost a game that was winnable at best. Again, get over it and learn to gameplan and you'll see less of these results.

Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 4/26/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By fd343ny on 4/26/2010



looks to me like this was about a one out of five ish chance of losing without game planning and a one out of twenty chance of losing with game planning

why not game plan, even if favored without it?

Because I looked at team composition and game circumstance, and this game was a gimme win for my AASU team, period. This is probably one foot out the door for me, so I'm sure that'll please everyone. I refuse to accept crap, period

Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 4/26/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By metsmax on 4/26/2010

In the midst of a whole lot of stuff that isnt all that amusing, this post made me smile.

In effect, by deciding NOT to game plan you converted this game from human v SIM into SIM v SIM.....or even worse, you may - we dont know - have some settings - distros, etc - that human review would suggest were negative for this matchup. This ended up being the equivalent of machine v machine.....John Conner would be proud....

I most certainly set my gameplan, distros, etc, thus there's nothing sim about me. I had a gameplan that was more than enough to win that game EASILY, period. Look what West Georgia did....look at what the 2 other sims did.