Posted by strikeout26 on 1/10/2018 9:36:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tangplay on 1/10/2018 8:57:00 AM (view original):
Posted by strikeout26 on 1/10/2018 7:50:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tangplay on 1/9/2018 10:44:00 PM (view original):
Where I live a kid has to go to the school in their district.
So, why do you say school choice doesn't work?
Because where I live it doesn't happen?
I also helped a local region with a.debate tournament so I have a ton of stuff around education readily available.
You're Not making any sense. It sounds like you're saying that since it's not done in Kansas, then it doesn't work.
However, the size of the effect depended on the type of school attended, and there were no significant
differences in graduation rates at better ranked schools. Additionally, lottery winners showed no
improvement on five of the six measured test outcomes and performed slightly worse on reading scores
by 1.3 percentile points. Looking at relative performance, students who won lotteries had worse class
ranks by 2 percentile points (or 6.9 percentile points for better ranked schools), likely reflecting a more
competitive peer group. Looking at specific race and gender groups, there is no evidence that any
subgroup derived any substantial academic benefit from winning a lottery to a choice school. Overall,
the results of this study align with other recent work on the absence of a positive impact of public school
choice and high-quality peers. The results reinforce a large body of prior work showing that school
inputs have little impact on student outcomes. The evidence suggests that a student’s relative position
among his or her peers may be an important factor in determining academic success. - Julie Cullen, 2016