Posted by cccp1014 on 3/4/2019 1:14:00 PM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 3/4/2019 1:12:00 PM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 3/4/2019 9:30:00 AM (view original):
Hillary has a new target to blame her loss on. She is now saying the supreme court cost her the election. She is a joke. How does she not realize that she was ****** candidate? That is like 20 different things now that she has blamed for her loss, but none of the 20 by her own doing. Her list runs from Jill Stein to the Supreme Court. What an idiot she is.

who the hell cares who HRC blames for her loss? It doesn't change anything. She still lost, whether it is because she is extremely unlikable, or Jill Stein or the Supreme court. It matters not at all to anyone except maybe her.

It matters to me. Don't speak for me, wylie.

why? why should you (or anyone else) care why HRC thinks she lost? Based on your beliefs, you should be happy that she did. But why should you care why she thinks she did?

being for medicare for all and tuition leg does not put you on far left.
being for strict but appropriate gun control does not put you in far left.
thats a fact mack.

also, how did I speak for you? I just asked why anyone would care about why HRC thinks she lost? Where in that question did I speak for you?

Posted by wylie715 on 3/4/2019 1:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 3/4/2019 1:14:00 PM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 3/4/2019 1:12:00 PM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 3/4/2019 9:30:00 AM (view original):
Hillary has a new target to blame her loss on. She is now saying the supreme court cost her the election. She is a joke. How does she not realize that she was ****** candidate? That is like 20 different things now that she has blamed for her loss, but none of the 20 by her own doing. Her list runs from Jill Stein to the Supreme Court. What an idiot she is.

who the hell cares who HRC blames for her loss? It doesn't change anything. She still lost, whether it is because she is extremely unlikable, or Jill Stein or the Supreme court. It matters not at all to anyone except maybe her.

It matters to me. Don't speak for me, wylie.

why? why should you (or anyone else) care why HRC thinks she lost? Based on your beliefs, you should be happy that she did. But why should you care why she thinks she did?

Because she was very close to being the most powerful person on Earth and I want to know her mindset. I always knew she was an awful candidate and unstable and the more data like this proves my point. SO I DO CARE.

But she lost and she is not thee most powerful being on Earth. What purpose does knowing her mindset serve? If she runs again (I hope not) you already knew her mindset before so I doubt you'd ever consider voting for her. So, what does caring about why she thought she lost accomplish?

Posted by wylie715 on 3/4/2019 1:18:00 PM (view original):
also, how did I speak for you? I just asked why anyone would care about why HRC thinks she lost? Where in that question did I speak for you?

"who the hell cares who HRC blames for her loss? "

_{I DO}

does anyone worry that thanks to trump there is no more nuclear treaty with russia.....bad..very bad...sad...you bet putin is happy......overwhelmingly joyous.
we are out of paris deal.he tried to ruin the iran nuke deal that worked but Europe saved the day......thank goodness for our former friends.
he is without a doubt the worst foreign policy prez ( if he indeed can be called a president ) i guess ever.
and because of him his genocidal killer loving friend of north korea now is recognized by the united states as a legit leader and it emboldens him.
xi...kim..putin...his 3 best leader friends....
get him out !!

Posted by wylie715 on 3/4/2019 1:16:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 3/4/2019 1:07:00 PM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 3/4/2019 12:59:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 3/3/2019 10:13:00 PM (view original):
That is why we elect people like Omar and Tlaib and fly the flag of Palestine at the DNC?

I label that is anti-american.

WE didn't elect Omar and Tlaib. The people in Michigan and Minnesota did. WE did not fly the Palestinian flag at the DNC. A few idiots did. What is anti-American is you lumping all Democrats together based on the action of a few.

I understand but I have yet to hear you say you disapprove of it.

I disapprove of anyone electing a racist or an anti semite. I don't like omar or tlaib, I don't approve of them and its doubtful I would ever vote for either of them, given the chance.
How is that?

That is all I wanted to hear. Thank you.

Posted by wylie715 on 3/4/2019 1:25:00 PM (view original):
But she lost and she is not thee most powerful being on Earth. What purpose does knowing her mindset serve? If she runs again (I hope not) you already knew her mindset before so I doubt you'd ever consider voting for her. So, what does caring about why she thought she lost accomplish?

Because many did vote for her and that is frightening to me. Not as frightening as the party pushing her on the voters but still frightening.

Posted by dino27 on 3/4/2019 1:29:00 PM (view original):
does anyone worry that thanks to trump there is no more nuclear treaty with russia.....bad..very bad...sad...you bet putin is happy......overwhelmingly joyous.
we are out of paris deal.he tried to ruin the iran nuke deal that worked but Europe saved the day......thank goodness for our former friends.
he is without a doubt the worst foreign policy prez ( if he indeed can be called a president ) i guess ever.
and because of him his genocidal killer loving friend of north korea now is recognized by the united states as a legit leader and it emboldens him.
xi...kim..putin...his 3 best leader friends....
get him out !!

You will have your chance in 2020.

Posted by cccp1014 on 3/4/2019 1:29:00 PM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 3/4/2019 1:25:00 PM (view original):
But she lost and she is not thee most powerful being on Earth. What purpose does knowing her mindset serve? If she runs again (I hope not) you already knew her mindset before so I doubt you'd ever consider voting for her. So, what does caring about why she thought she lost accomplish?

Because many did vote for her and that is frightening to me. Not as frightening as the party pushing her on the voters but still frightening.

You elected Donald Trump. You have no moral high ground to criticize the Democrats.

Posted by dino27 on 3/4/2019 1:18:00 PM (view original):
being for medicare for all and tuition leg does not put you on far left.
being for strict but appropriate gun control does not put you in far left.
thats a fact mack.

#1) Look at my thread. It doesn't work. So you pining for it is illogical.
#2) We have strict gun control laws


You are the FAR LEFT. You redline those who disagree with you. You label those who disagree with you as racist. You want to take money from the "rich" and give it to the "poor". 70% tax rate means that those who earn certain monies work for 8.5 months for free. You want open borders.

It is illogical.

Posted by bad_luck on 3/4/2019 1:30:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 3/4/2019 1:29:00 PM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 3/4/2019 1:25:00 PM (view original):
But she lost and she is not thee most powerful being on Earth. What purpose does knowing her mindset serve? If she runs again (I hope not) you already knew her mindset before so I doubt you'd ever consider voting for her. So, what does caring about why she thought she lost accomplish?

Because many did vote for her and that is frightening to me. Not as frightening as the party pushing her on the voters but still frightening.

You elected Donald Trump. You have no moral high ground to criticize the Democrats.

I did? Prove it. I live in MA.

Posted by bad_luck on 3/4/2019 11:46:00 AM (view original):

Posted by dahsdebater on 3/4/2019 11:09:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 3/4/2019 10:23:00 AM (view original):
I also don’t think being banned by twitter/Facebook/YouTube constitutes a violation of your free speech rights.

I don't see how it could. These are private corporations and as long as their rules aren't targeted at individuals or protected groups, they can make and enforce whatever content restrictions they would prefer. Of course, there is a large group of people in the country who still hold Facebook accountable, at least in part, for what happened in the 2016 presidential election. In many cases those persons would believe that Facebook should be legally required to censor content. I also disagree wholeheartedly with this. As a private corporation they are under no obligation to enforce any content restrictions not required by US or international law and again, can choose their own rules so long as they are fair.

I think it’s reasonable to say that the propaganda spread on Facebook had some impact on 2016.

Whether or not Facebook should be held accountable has more to do with whether or not they broke the law.

That is not the standard to which many people in this country - include some of the people in congress who have had the opportunity to address Mark Zuckerberg during his testimonies there - seem to want to hold this privately-held company. There has been a repeated argument that FB is obligated to vet its user accounts for authenticity. That is an absurd burden for a company with a user base that is basically the world's population along with many of their pets, stuffed animals, organizations, etc

Without going into detail, I think most people would agree that it is not illegal in any jurisdiction for Russian "operative" to own and operate any number of Facebook accounts and publish any opinions and links they wish on those accounts. It may be a violation of Facebook TOS, but not the law.

Posted by cccp1014 on 3/4/2019 1:36:00 PM (view original):

Posted by dino27 on 3/4/2019 1:18:00 PM (view original):
being for medicare for all and tuition leg does not put you on far left.
being for strict but appropriate gun control does not put you in far left.
thats a fact mack.

#1) Look at my thread. It doesn't work. So you pining for it is illogical.
#2) We have strict gun control laws


You are the FAR LEFT. You redline those who disagree with you. You label those who disagree with you as racist. You want to take money from the "rich" and give it to the "poor". 70% tax rate means that those who earn certain monies work for 8.5 months for free. You want open borders.

It is illogical.

im none of the things you said.
as for redlining i redlined 2 things...those who said things about Israel i thought were antisemitic..you gonna sue me ?
i redlined some posts that i thought were posted in a venemous way...i would probably do that again and get in trouble....so i dont do threads on politics anymore and now i said if you cant change them then join them.
you sound like a moron harping forever on my redlining...right or wrong i had a reason.
btw...we already have a progressive tax system dope.
the type of tax plan you talk about is for money over a very high amount and there are already giant deductions.