Quote: Originally posted by antonsirius on 4/26/2010

Quote: Originally posted by colonels19 on 4/26/2010I didn't need to coach to win that game

Reality says otherwise.

Quote: Originally Posted By johnsensing on 4/26/2010
what's a shame is that you didn't run uptempo. you deserve to lose for that alone. he had 7 scholly players, for god's sake.

man up and admit you screwed up. crazy stuff happens in this game all the time -- by willfully refusing to maximize your chances of winning (as explained by numerous veteran coaches), you greatly contributed to the probability that you'd lose. why is this so hard for you to understand? why do you refuse to learn from this?



Still shouldn't have lost because of it, that's the point.

Quote: Originally Posted By dalter on 4/26/2010If anyone ever wanted to watch a retarded 3rd grader debate a Supreme Court Justice, this is your chance.

Quote: Originally Posted By fd343ny on 4/26/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 4/26/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By metsmax on 4/26/2010

In the midst of a whole lot of stuff that isnt all that amusing, this post made me smile.

In effect, by deciding NOT to game plan you converted this game from human v SIM into SIM v SIM.....or even worse, you may - we dont know - have some settings - distros, etc - that human review would suggest were negative for this matchup. This ended up being the equivalent of machine v machine.....John Conner would be proud....

I most certainly set my gameplan, distros, etc, thus there's nothing sim about me. I had a gameplan that was more than enough to win that game EASILY, period. Look what West Georgia did....look at what the 2 other sims did.

compare and contrast

Quote: Originally Posted By fd343ny on 4/26/2010
why not game plan? "because it was a gimme win"

did you game plan? "of course I did"

did you order the code red? "damn straight I ordered the code red"





The game plan was set to the standards that I always have them at, and given those standards, this game was a gimme...I don't see how you guys can tout otherwise...its plain ridiculous. I should have won that game, period.

Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 4/26/2010

Quote: Originally posted by antonsirius on 4/26/2010

Quote: Originally posted by colonels19 on 4/26/2010I didn't need to coach to win that game

Reality says otherwise.

The fact that he feels coaching should have nothing to do in the game goes to show how much of a fraud he is
I never said this spinster...I said coaching is secondary to team talent...try to keep up.

Quote: Originally Posted By doomey on 4/26/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 4/26/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By doomey on 4/26/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 4/26/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By gillispie1 on 4/26/2010

Originally posted by ME:

Because you can't use other teams to justify your own results. They are a differant team, have differant settings, ratings and IQ's? Just a thought. Yeah and here's a thought, my team is considerably better than the team that beat the **** out of Montevallo (Flat out wrong, subtract his walkons and you are equal at best and he has much better defensive IQ's)...and since Team Talent is the most important thing in this game (Again wrong. it is a game of individual matchups as well, probably moreso when running anything but zone), there should have been no way that I lost that game (AGAIN wrong. You were favored, nothing more).

You keep harping on the fact that it was a sim. Say it was a human who ran those exact same settings. What would be the differance? You already said you were ok with losing to humans who were rated lower. Its always more justifiable losing to a human than a sim (According to you. If you gameplanned maybe we wouldn't even be having this conversation, but either way, once the game starts it doesn't matter who is coaching) The point being, once the game starts, it doesn't matter who is coaching, it matters how they set the team up beforehand. You didn't, neither did the sim (who could be any novice coach out there). Ok, let's say that's the case, my team is considerably better, advantage me...I WIN...or not....... (No, advantage to the team that plays the situation correctly, you did not, thus risked a loss)

You were not robbed, you were not gypped, you lost a game that was winnable at best. Again, get over it and learn to gameplan and you'll see less of these results.

Quote: Originally Posted By a_in_the_b on 4/26/2010http://www.whatifsports.com/hd/GameResults/BoxScore.aspx?gid=5619680

Principia, with an "OTR" which is sixty points better than its opponent (479 - 418) loses, by six, to a team with six walkons. Principia is better to significantly better in every single rating category - and has only two walkons itself.

Quote: Originally posted by colonels19 on 4/26/2010I lost because the sim screwed me, not because of a sh!tty gameplan

Quote: Originally Posted By antonsirius on 4/26/2010

Quote: Originally posted by colonels19 on 4/26/2010 I lost because the sim screwed me, not because of a sh!tty gameplan

Your sh!tty game plan opened the door for the sim to screw you.

Grow up and accept responsibility for your mistakes, child
If I lost because of some obvious wrongdoing of my own, I would have....that's not what happened here.

Quote: Originally posted by colonels19 on 4/26/2010its not close to be the same thing as what happened here....its much more justifiable if a low human beats a high sim rather than a low sim beating a high human...I don't understand why this is hard to grasp.