Posted by tangplay on 5/25/2021 4:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by dino27 on 5/25/2021 3:52:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/25/2021 3:27:00 PM (view original):
And btw, Dino is a ******* coward.

Won't say **** about CCCP justifying the Holocaust earlier and saying that FDR had good reason to use concentration camps against Japanese-Americans.

Scum.

Didn’t read it.

Coward

dino may be a coward or may not be but I doubt you would say that to his face so don't type here something that you would not say to someone's face. Pretty simple. I have stated my position on the Holocaust. You of course did not relay it correctly or understand it but that is fine. That is more your problem than mine. Are you majoring in Godwin's Law?

In time of war, yes it is better to be safe than sorry. Jews never attacked Germany so it is a false conflation.

Germany was at war, and Jews were viewed as enemies of the state. So yes, it's 1 to 1. It's literally the exact same logic. Yeah, you would support genocide, right? It's better to be safe than sorry?

It is interesting how you scream about human rights but you're pro choice and don't care than millions of babies are killed annually via abortions? Do you find abortions justified?

Very weird comparison, but yeah, I think abortion is generally pretty sad and I want to take policies that reduce the amount of abortions that take place.

And by the way, the residents of that neighborhood have never attacked Israel, just as Jews never attacked Germany.

Posted by tangplay on 5/25/2021 4:18:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 5/25/2021 3:57:00 PM (view original):

Posted by dino27 on 5/25/2021 3:52:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 5/25/2021 3:27:00 PM (view original):
And btw, Dino is a ******* coward.

Won't say **** about CCCP justifying the Holocaust earlier and saying that FDR had good reason to use concentration camps against Japanese-Americans.

Scum.

Didn’t read it.

tangplay doesn't understand that justify and condone aren't the same thing. Justify means to give reasons for. I don't condone the Holocaust. Sigh....

If you were in FDR's position, would you have put Japanese-Americans in internment camps during WW2?

If not, give me reasons that don't apply to the Palestinian evictions.

I would honestly rely on my secretary of War and if he said there is a credible threat to the US and we need to go down that route I would have. I am not a veteran and I am not skilled in war, espionage and military tactics/intelligence. These aren't evictions. I have shown you the law. Do you dispute the law? That is fine but Israel won the war and they get to make the law. Your conflation is furthermore false. No one is putting these persons in jail, they are saying the land doesn't legally belong to you.

We cannot resolve this because you call them evictions and I call them disputes. So we are spinning our wheels, like Mahomes was in that SB as he got utterly embarrassed.

Posted by tangplay on 5/25/2021 4:21:00 PM (view original):

In time of war, yes it is better to be safe than sorry. Jews never attacked Germany so it is a false conflation.

Germany was at war, and Jews were viewed as enemies of the state. So yes, it's 1 to 1. It's literally the exact same logic. Yeah, you would support genocide, right? It's better to be safe than sorry?

It is interesting how you scream about human rights but you're pro choice and don't care than millions of babies are killed annually via abortions? Do you find abortions justified?

Very weird comparison, but yeah, I think abortion is generally pretty sad and I want to take policies that reduce the amount of abortions that take place.

They started rounding up the Jews before war started so you're wrong yet again. Pretty sad? Murder of millions is "pretty sad"? You're more upset about a dozen land disputes than millions of babies being killed. Interesting. See I am pro choice. I see abortions as justified. You, well you're a hypocrite.

Posted by tangplay on 5/25/2021 4:22:00 PM (view original):
And by the way, the residents of that neighborhood have never attacked Israel, just as Jews never attacked Germany.

Of course they have attacked Israel. I posted a link with 13 arrests. Jews never said "Death to Germany, we want to make Germany a Jewish country". Your conflation is false. Are you tired of getting schooled or should we keep going?

**** off, douchebag

You are blocking the author of this post, bronxcheer also the Mets suck.

I don't think we can resolve this because you think extreme actions like concentration camps or kicking people out of homes are justified if there is even a chance (without evidence) that some people within a group will do violence, despite not being violent for 80 years. I just don't understand how you can have this belief. Explaining why the evictions are wrong is exactly the same as explaining to Hitler why he shouldn't execute Jewish people. You don't view the Palestinians as human beings, so saying 'harm is being done and lives are being ruined" is irrelevant to you. Your logic is the same logic that supports atrocities throughout human history. As you said, you would have rounded up Japanese-Americans and put them in concentration camps.

The only argument I could make to you at this point is to point out that evicting the Palestinians will only increase Hamas's power and increase conflict.

By the way, those 13 arrests were not in that neighborhood. So still no evidence of them attacking Israel.

On the land disputes point, you never answered what happens to the Palestinians if they lose the "land dispute"?

btw, dino is still a coward, he won't say **** about CCCP openly saying he agreed with FDR's decision to put Japanese-Americans in internment camps (but only if the Sec of war supported it).

Posted by tangplay on 5/25/2021 4:39:00 PM (view original):
I don't think we can resolve this because you think extreme actions like concentration camps or kicking people out of homes are justified if there is even a chance (without evidence) that some people within a group will do violence, despite not being violent for 80 years. I just don't understand how you can have this belief. Explaining why the evictions are wrong is exactly the same as explaining to Hitler why he shouldn't execute Jewish people. You don't view the Palestinians as human beings, so saying 'harm is being done and lives are being ruined" is irrelevant to you. Your logic is the same logic that supports atrocities throughout human history. As you said, you would have rounded up Japanese-Americans and put them in concentration camps.

The only argument I could make to you at this point is to point out that evicting the Palestinians will only increase Hamas's power and increase conflict.

By the way, those 13 arrests were not in that neighborhood. So still no evidence of them attacking Israel.

On the land disputes point, you never answered what happens to the Palestinians if they lose the "land dispute"?

#1) They have been violent and are led by Islamic radicals sworn to the destruction of Israel. Say there are 50 Palestinian homes. Say one has family in Gaza and Hamas threatens that family if the person inside the WB doesn't commit an act of terror vs. Israel? You're dealing with radicals sworn to kill you. Anything and everything is justified.

#2) Evictions and Executions are NOT the same and they aren't evictions they are land disputes. You calling them evictions doesn't make them evictions.

#3) I said I would listen to my secretary of War. I never said I would have rounded up anyone. You lied once again and Japanese were in detainment camps not concentration camps. False conflation yet again.

#4) If Palestinians lose the land dispute then its not their land. Wars have consequences.

#5) Hamas' power comes from Iran.

You don't really have a moral high ground to stand on as you support the killings of innocent babies. Pretty heinous of you

Posted by tangplay on 5/25/2021 4:40:00 PM (view original):
btw, dino is still a coward, he won't say **** about CCCP openly saying he agreed with FDR's decision to put Japanese-Americans in internment camps (but only if the Sec of war supported it).

I said I would listen to my secretary of War. You asked me a direct question and I answered you directly. No need to lie.

My argument against your logic would have been "well, saying 'some members of a group MIGHT support Hamas so everyone who isn't Jewish must be removed' is a very similar line of reasoning to other atrocities like the internment of Japanese-Americans (which were absolutely in concentration camps), but you already said you support those things (as long as the Sec of war is for it) so I can't argue against it.

Why hasn't this scenario happened yet? Why don't we see terror attacks from this neighborhood?

You said that if they lose the "land dispute" they lose the home. That's an eviction, dude. What happens if they lose the land dispute? THEY GET EVICTED!

You don't think more angry Palestinians who want revenge on Israel=more support for Hamas? You don't think Hamas's power comes from the Palestinian people at all? If not, how can you blame the Palestinian people for Hamas?

I just wish you actually had to confront the people IRL and tell this **** to their face. Tell them why you support them losing their homes.

What would you do if you were one of the many people who don't want to kill Jewish people, just happen to live there and not be Jewish, and are now about to lose your home?

"It's not an eviction, it's a land dispute!"
"Your honor, I didn't kill him. I simply fired a gun in his direction."