Sure. I'm doing a paper on "Ego". It's not so much an obsession, more of a curiosity. Mike is nearly twice my age, yet at times seem to act half my age. Mike goes to great lengths to protect his "Internet Persona".  I find it fascinating. Mike is only one subject from this board (out of 3. This place is an easy target).

Since I need a question: If you don't want to exchange insults with me, why not ignore me? Why answer questions about me, but not my own questions? Why go tattle to CS to make sure nobody else can read what I said (which contained no insult, as you've shown above such things can simply be a statement). Shouldn't you be more consistent?

 P.S. If anyone wants a copy, I'd be happy to e-mail them one.

Q: You do know that you should always have more than one subject, right (to compare & contrast)? If you're being honest about doing some research on stalking, Lesliechow would be another good subject (I went with PT & soxfan myself, although I kinda wish Lesliechow would've blown up like he has recently before I started).

I'd be flattered to be a part of anyone's study on anything. Anything to further education is a good thing! That little nugget on your real self and internet self is very helpful. Thanks!

I do prod, no doubt, to get a response. It's kinda why the redline bothered me (I'll admit to that). I prefer for our discussions to be in public record, so to speak. I can't use what gets taken down or is posted in a manner that can be edited and not verified (like a site-mail).

No. Only the gay ones.  I hope not.  Not in America, not sure about Canuckada.

He's a bit of a perv.  Probably.   Very likely.

No, he doesn't not.  Morally wrong.  It's like taking advantage of the mentally challenged.

Too long.