Posted by kcden on 11/3/2010 6:18:00 PM (view original):

Posted by willsauve on 11/3/2010 6:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by deanod on 11/3/2010 5:02:00 PM (view original):
Heh, I used your line.  Told the commish that this isn't a Yahoo league for funsies.  And I also threw in a few comments about no backsies.  He seems hell bent on undoing  the trade though, so I'm just going to bash the fukk out of the 'tard who offered the trade on league e-mail.  So I guess I'm out of recourses?

All this being said. The trade is very lopsided and it should've been vetoed to begin with. It wouldnt be fair to the other owners in your league.. Wouldn't you agree?

How is trading a QB that was picked up off of the waiver wire and hasn't played in 3 (or 4?) weeks for a very talented backup RB so lopsided a trade that it should be vetoed?

You're right what was I thinking...

Stewart 64 carries, 178 yds, 2.8 avg, 1 td (7 games played)

for

a QB who has just as many yds rushing and has missed games and is now coming back healhty..

Vick (4 games)
26 carries, 178 yds, 1 TD,   799 pass yds, 6td, 0Int

What was I thinking??

It's the NFL.  Vick gets dinged.   Stewart is one play away from being a starter.  Not that lopsided.

I'd say Vick has more value regardless of how he was acquired.

About hairy dudes in small undies.

Jonathon Stewart has been dropped in one of my leagues.  He was the starter last week and will likely start this week.  That doesnt make his team any better.

That is not a question.

What's the over/under for how long it takes before the Titans regret picking up Randy Moss?  And would that be measured in weeks, days or hours?

How many Giants are replaced on the 25 man roster before opening day?

That might actually work out for them.  Fisher is a respected coach and Moss wants another deal.  Of course, since Young throws about 9 passes per game, I'm not sure Moss will get the catches he wants in order to justify another deal.

I don't know enough about them to have a clue.  But most are young and cheap so I wouldn't guess that many. 

i find it kind of surprising that the rangers declined vlad's option. sure he'd be making $9 mil this season and will probably not hit as well as last season, but isn't he worth taking another flier on? possibly signing him to another one year deal for something between $5 and $9 mil???

He really hasn't fallen off as a hitter.  I'm assuming the Rangers know he's a DH so they only have to bid against 13 other teams.   You can probably elminate half of them because they're not going to pay 9m for a 36 year old DH with a history of injury.   Then you can probably eliminate another 3-4 because they've got their own DH-types making big money.   I imagine they'll make an offer for quite a bit less than 9m.

Sporting News says Joba is the Yankees' top trade bait. Your reaction?

Sporting News has hired the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel's sports editor as their editor in chief. Your reaction?

I don't think Joba's value is very high right now.   If he was going to be dealt, it should have been right after the 2007 season.   His upside is more valuable than his value in trade.

TSN has been going downhill for quite some time.   Just another example of their slide.

Mike, when is the earliest can I sign a FA and not get hit with the Type A/B supp pick part?

http://www.whatifsports.com/hbd/Pages/Popups/PlayerProfile.aspx?pid=404815

Would you give this guy a 3-yr, $22.5M deal to stay?

When the draft prospects are displayed.    The note "This player is a Type A....." will disappear.

He's worth it.   I have a trouble getting full usage from those types but he's worth 7.5m per.  You should be able to get 100+ IP from him if you know how.   It would take some work but maybe a B tandem every time he's 100%.

I suspect using a mopup setting with a horrible team will accomplish that as well, don't you think?