Team History
| Season | Coach | Overall W-L | Home W-L | Road W-L | Neutral W-L | Conf W-L | Rank | RPI | Prestige | Notes |
|---|
| 32 | colorblind79 | 26-6 | 11-2 | 11-2 | 4-2 | 13-3 | 9 | 3 | A | Conf Champion NT At-large Bid NT (Sweet 16) |
| 31 | colorblind79 | 24-9 | 12-3 | 6-5 | 6-1 | 11-5 | 9 | 14 | A- | CT Champion NT (Elite 8) |
| 30 | colorblind79 | 12-16 | 11-4 | 0-11 | 1-1 | 5-11 | | 118 | B | |
| 29 | colorblind79 | 17-13 | 8-6 | 7-5 | 2-2 | 9-7 | | 45 | B+ | NT At-large Bid NT (1st Round) |
| 28 | colorblind79 | 17-11 | 10-5 | 6-5 | 1-1 | 9-7 | | 109 | B+ | |
| 27 | Sim AI | 4-23 | 4-8 | 0-14 | 0-1 | 1-15 | | 251 | A | |
| 26 | oldresorter | 24-8 | 12-2 | 7-5 | 5-1 | 12-4 | 11 | 8 | A+ | CT Champion NT (Sweet 16) |
| 25 | oldresorter | 25-10 | 10-1 | 7-8 | 8-1 | 10-6 | 2 | 9 | A+ | Conf Champion CT Champion NT (Championship Game) |
| 24 | oldresorter | 23-10 | 10-2 | 8-6 | 5-2 | 10-6 | 11 | 13 | A | NT At-large Bid NT (Final Four) |
| 23 | oldresorter | 16-13 | 8-5 | 7-6 | 1-2 | 8-8 | | 57 | A | NT At-large Bid NT (1st Round) |
| 22 | oldresorter | 19-10 | 11-2 | 7-6 | 1-2 | 10-6 | | 15 | A | NT At-large Bid NT (2nd Round) |
| 21 | oldresorter | 19-11 | 10-3 | 7-6 | 2-2 | 11-5 | | 28 | A | NT At-large Bid NT (2nd Round) |
| 20 | oldresorter | 27-3 | 12-0 | 13-1 | 2-2 | 15-1 | 24 | 5 | A- | Conf Champion NT At-large Bid NT (2nd Round) |
| 19 | oldresorter | 25-7 | 9-4 | 12-1 | 4-2 | 13-3 | 14 | 13 | A- | Conf Champion NT At-large Bid NT (Elite 8) |
| 18 | oldresorter | 11-16 | 5-5 | 6-10 | 0-1 | 5-11 | | 119 | A- | |
| 17 | oldresorter | 10-17 | 8-7 | 2-9 | 0-1 | 4-12 | | 224 | - | |
| 16 | Sim AI | 10-17 | 6-8 | 4-8 | 0-1 | 8-8 | | 238 | - | |
---------
a championship game appearance, a final four, three second-rounds, and another NT bid to go before I live up to my predecessor. If I win a championship before getting all of that, I think the argument could be made that I'd eclipse him, but oldresorter is one of the best in this game, if not the best.
We're losing 4 out of 5 starters, assuming that French comes back as a 5th year senior. My goal for next season is to have a quality group of recruits, develop well, and reach the NT. Anything less would be a disappointment, and anything more would be remarkable.
How much better would we have been with Traylor? Well, it would have helped our long-term health, considering that we've gone from a 4-4-1-3, which isn't great, to a 5-3-1-3, which is arguably worse. I guess I could consider picking up a JuCo Jr. and maybe shifting it to a 4-3-2-3. I would like to eventually get over to a 3-3-3-3...I just think that having three seniors every year would maximize success. However, that would assume that no Traylors happen, not to mention the legitimate stars who aren't seniors would have to stay for the full 4 years. I dunno. Maybe it's just a matter of planning each year independently.