Quote: Originally Posted By pstrnutbag44 on 9/19/2009
Z, Hargrave in Major Leagues hasn't convinced you of that? I've never had a catcher with a PC above 63, yet I am always amongst the league leaders in pitching, especially OAV. Knuckles is right on when it comes to the Low Vs High PC thing. Quality pitchers negate their value.
No, he hasn't convinced me of it. Your home park is (-1, -2, -2, -1, -1) and you have excellent pitchers.
I, arguably, have comperable pitchers (though yours may actually be better), but play in a slight hitters' park (0, 2, 2, 0, 0). Yet, for most of the World's history, my pitchers have put up better numbers. While some of this may be attributable to better defense at other positions, I think some has to do with the higher quality defensive catcher as well.
When you rely on Hargrave to prove that PC doesn't matter much with good pitchers, I think you overlook at least 2 things - 1) he's not *that* bad a defensive catcher; 2) park impacts are *very* important.
Just look at this past season, where your pitchers posted better overall numbers.
Oakland at home: 3.29 ERA
Oakland on the road: 4.22 ERA
Oakland overall: 3.75 ERA
Maybe with a top flight defensive catcher, your road ERA would be in the top 1/4 of the league?