great call.
we play WIS. we all use this number generating machine every day. thats all belichick did. he was runing the numbers.
Sim this situation 1000 times going for it, and 1000 times punting it. i'll bet a lot of money that going for it results in more Pats victories. isn't that all that matters? That your decisions as a coach result in more victories than losses? The media and Joe Moron on AM radio have WAY too much influence in the sports world these days. and its sad. . .
First off i think people are looking at this way too simplistic. Throwing out random numbers, but its just to get my point across. Say success of a 4th and 2 is 60%. Say success of Payton driving down the field in 2 min is 30%.
In scenario #1 Pats win 60% of the time.
In scenario #2 Pats win 70% of the time.
So scenario #2 it is, right, kick the ball?
Wrong. In scenario #1, the 40% of the time that you fail, you still dont lose.
The offense still has to score in the most difficult section of the field. the red zone. i would venture (probably unpopular) a guess that the odds of Payton scoring from 30 yards out are not much higher than him scoring from 70 yards out.
Payton with for downs to get a first is deadly. 3rd and 7 situations are not normal 3rd and 7's. The playbook is that much more open when an offense knows it has four downs to convert. I think its almost a given that if the Pats punted, the Colts would have gotten to where the Pats turned it over on downs. So they have a minute less of time. But they're in the same spot on the field (30) as when the Pats went for it. And the Pats at least took a shot at an instant win.