Can Winning Matter, Please? Topic

Ok so I looked breiefly...getting outta here and didnt feel like wasting time...until 2006 the NIT required a winning record but this is no longer the case...New Mexico has gone to the NIT with a losing record.
5/11/2010 4:32 PM
Here's a serious question: How many top 50 RPI teams (DI) are there with a SOS of 300+? +250? +200??

My guess is it's near impossible to be Top 50 RPI with a 300 SOS.. or 250 for that matter
5/11/2010 4:32 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By mmt0315 on 5/11/2010Ok so I looked breiefly...getting outta here and didnt feel like wasting time...until 2006 the NIT required a winning record but this is no longer the case...New Mexico has gone to the NIT with a losing record
And the record was?

My system would put below .500 teams potentially into the PI/NIT too, but not a 9-19 team, by any circumstance, especially one that got blown the eff out 14 of 19 times.
5/11/2010 4:34 PM
Oh my god....its happened. I agree with Colonels. 9-19 teams should NEVER make the PT.
5/11/2010 4:49 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By mmt0315 on 5/11/2010
Quote: Originally Posted By sully712 on 5/11/2010
Lets say Syracuse added 5 teams to their schedule which dropped the SOS to around 100. They would definitely have 20 wins. Teams are getting rewarded for beating bad teams and padding their stats.
You have nothing to base that on...and you dont know that the resulting crappy teams wouldnt shoot the RPI into the 100s as well, Syracuse's nonconference schedule was pretty pathetic and he went 7-9 in conference the SOS is simply a result of playing in a tough conference. By your screwed up logic a team that goes 0-26 with the #1 SOS should get into the tournament over a team that goes 26-0 but has the #300 SOS...because the 0-26 team surely would have won 26 games had they scheduled easier...you know what they'd call my mom if she had a set of nuts?
Pete?
5/11/2010 4:52 PM
You don't build good programs in d2 or d3 by going to the PI. He can schedule hard, but if he doesn't win enough games, he won't make the NT, which has to be the goal.
5/11/2010 4:52 PM
Could we just ask that PIT teams have 12 wins minimum? And NT teams have a minimum of 14? I can't see any circumstance where this is not a good idea.
5/11/2010 4:56 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By reinsel on 5/11/2010Could we just ask that PIT teams have 12 wins minimum? And NT teams have a minimum of 14? I can't see any circumstance where this is not a good idea




Other than Auto-bid, I have no problems with this
5/11/2010 5:01 PM
Yeah, that makes sense. I understand that the idea is to make the selection rules as close as possible to real life, but I have to agree with colonels et al that when a 9-19 team makes the postseason then real life has not been successfully simulated.
5/11/2010 5:09 PM
I actually agree. No 9 - 19 teams in the PT. Now a 13 - 15 team, you coudl possibly make an argument for if they had a number of really good wins among the thirteen and mostly tough losses among the 15. . . but 9 - 19? Shouldn't be in.

5/11/2010 5:34 PM
And See Colonels? We don't disagree with you just because its you, we disagree with you because we disagree.

5/11/2010 5:36 PM
Why reward teams for losing, even if it's to good teams? Because they tried hard?
5/11/2010 5:44 PM
Im glad i made such a stink lol. Well i agree too I shouldnt have made the PT....but who knows my goal for the rest of the season is to get to ten wins.....oh by the way my first opponent i beat by 20 in the regular season........
5/11/2010 7:37 PM
check that 30 points
5/11/2010 7:38 PM
Oh can we call this the joco rule since peopel are drawing all this attention to them self? seriously.....I should just start all my freshman and walk ons for this game maybe some people would be happy
5/11/2010 7:44 PM
◂ Prev 1|2|3|4...8 Next ▸
Can Winning Matter, Please? Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.