Posted by dyoungquist on 2/8/2011 7:34:00 PM (view original):
1. I never said in my first post that 100 health rating players should never get injured and did not mean to imply they should not either.
2. This is not a witch hunt. I am not out to prove any HBD user right or wrong.
3. I admit the data I am collecting is limited and misses small injuries where the player is not put on the DL. Usefullness of this data is therefore limited
With no prior data to compare this with, I have no way to prove injuries are up or down right now. It is more curiosity than anything to see how various worlds compare with each other. If you want to help by providing your worlds data, great. If you don't want to help and instead want to slam me and assign alterior motives to what I am doing, you have the right to do but any and all such talk will be meaningless.
Not slamming you at all...just didn't understand the point to this part:
"In Edmonds, we recently had an owner (not me) with $20mil training (helps reduce frequency of injuries) and $20mil medical (helps reduce length of injuries) budgets have a 100 health rated player go down with a season ending injury towards the beginning of the season."
I hate to sound so harsh, but so what? Sounds like random injury to me. What do the budgets, etc have to do with anything? I like what you are doing, I just didn;t get what that part had to do with anything.