Posted by dcy0827 on 9/7/2012 10:33:00 PM (view original):

Posted by darnoc29099 on 9/7/2012 10:31:00 PM (view original):

Posted by dcy0827 on 9/7/2012 10:18:00 PM (view original):

Posted by darnoc29099 on 9/7/2012 10:14:00 PM (view original):
#1:  I've always thought the game should tie SH and collegiate GPA into how quickly they improve their O/D IQs.  As it stands, SH is only used for eligibility, right?

Not to be a smartass, but how does my freshman's grade in Psych 101 relate in any way to how fast he learns my team's offense?

It doesn't...and I see what you're saying.  I just feel like the SH category, as it stands, is just something to throw 3 minutes of practice time towards and serves no other purpose.  You put minutes into the other categories to see gains.  You put minutes into SH to prevent a loss...just seems like the oddball out.

To be perfectly honest, it wouldn't break my heart if they did away with grades altogether.

its on seble's theoretical "list" from what I understand (to address it, not necessarily eliminate it, but I think that is one option being considered)

I dunno about eliminating it ... I can see that one either way.

These kids are here to learn.  This isn't crack baby basketball, for goodness sakes.  Address it, yes...but don't eliminate. 

I like the idea of pre-loading 1st cycle recruiting actions.  It does seem to be a very popular idea.  However, as the devil's advocate, we all know there are going to be threads from people complaining who dump a ton of cash of a recruit only to see him "very tight" with a Sim.  Now in theory, that's no different than 2 humans getting on a recruit in the same cycle, but with 2 people you can generally figure out who has how much cash on hand, and factor in prestige and distance.  With the Sims not following the same recruiting rules, wouldn't Seble have to change Sim recruiting to follow the same rules as human recruiting to make things fair? Or is this a risk we are all willing to take?