Posted by oldave on 12/9/2014 4:12:00 PM (view original):
kind of funny now that i look at last few posts...
originally it was said that it wouldnt make sense for IQ to affect SP. and i kinda agreed.
then it was said that it doesnt make sense for IQ to affect PE. and that makes sense too. and then when i think about it, in real terms, we would expect that IQ would help a player get less contested looks when he shoots. which would actually be tied to SP!
heres another spitball thought... maybe the first calculation in a shot event is "how open is the player?" which might look at his speed, bh, teammates, IQs, and ooponents defensive IQ and attributes (and also fatigue) to come with an openness number. and then thier LP or PE would be used to determine if they make it. thus, a player with 94 PE who is really slow and low IQ and playing against a great D, would shoot a really low % not becuase of his PE (he's still a great shooter, technically) but because he cant get open. ... maybe?
my head hurts
No, I am with you. I tried to explain that is what I thought, probably didn't get that across :( Anyway, that is what I am saying. A 94 PERIM shooter is a 94 PERIM shooter, that we can agree on. How good his IQ is in the offense is how open he can get. That vs. the defensive IQ, what they run, blah blah. So, if what you are saying is that it ultimately plays into a "formula", I can get on board with that.
It's like Michael Jordan shooting an open jumper. If he is open from 15 feet, 99.99% of the time he is sinking it. But, if defense gets put on him, probably a double team, and he has to shoot a turn around fade away, the percentage isn't going to be as high.
So, yes I think that based on programming, it has to be a formula. A 94 PERIM shooter with an A+ IQ vs a 94 DEF player with a C IQ, is going to shoot at a higher percentage than vice versa.