Posted by Benis on 6/21/2017 1:00:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 6/21/2017 12:46:00 PM (view original):
I'm gonna mark the day on my calendar that benis doesn't mention 2.0. Dude has a morbid fascination with a dead game.

You can block me and then you won't be forced to read all about my fascinations.

Nah. Sometimes you're amusing. And that's hard to find in this forum.

Posted by pallas on 6/21/2017 12:49:00 PM (view original):
I'm gonna mark the day on my calendar that Mike doesn't hop in a thread to start something. Dude has a morbid fascination with creating something.

You can block me and then you won't be forced to read all about my fascinations.

Posted by MikeT23 on 6/21/2017 1:01:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Benis on 6/21/2017 1:00:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 6/21/2017 12:46:00 PM (view original):
I'm gonna mark the day on my calendar that benis doesn't mention 2.0. Dude has a morbid fascination with a dead game.

You can block me and then you won't be forced to read all about my fascinations.

Nah. Sometimes you're amusing. And that's hard to find in this forum.

That's the nicest thing anyone has ever said to me.

Posted by Benis on 6/21/2017 1:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 6/21/2017 1:01:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Benis on 6/21/2017 1:00:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 6/21/2017 12:46:00 PM (view original):
I'm gonna mark the day on my calendar that benis doesn't mention 2.0. Dude has a morbid fascination with a dead game.

You can block me and then you won't be forced to read all about my fascinations.

Nah. Sometimes you're amusing. And that's hard to find in this forum.

That's the nicest thing anyone has ever said to me.

Don't let it go to your head. It's "sometimes" and, in the HD forum, the bar for "amusing" is super low. Humorless mofos up in here.

Posted by MikeT23 on 6/21/2017 1:07:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Benis on 6/21/2017 1:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 6/21/2017 1:01:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Benis on 6/21/2017 1:00:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 6/21/2017 12:46:00 PM (view original):
I'm gonna mark the day on my calendar that benis doesn't mention 2.0. Dude has a morbid fascination with a dead game.

You can block me and then you won't be forced to read all about my fascinations.

Nah. Sometimes you're amusing. And that's hard to find in this forum.

That's the nicest thing anyone has ever said to me.

Don't let it go to your head. It's "sometimes" and, in the HD forum, the bar for "amusing" is super low. Humorless mofos up in here.

No no no, its too late. You can't take it back now.

Posted by MikeT23 on 6/21/2017 1:02:00 PM (view original):

Posted by pallas on 6/21/2017 12:49:00 PM (view original):
I'm gonna mark the day on my calendar that Mike doesn't hop in a thread to start something. Dude has a morbid fascination with creating something.

You can block me and then you won't be forced to read all about my fascinations.

I can appreciate what you did here.

I think people should stay on topic. It proves overall rating is a lot higher, Trenton 5 per stats is probably a good assumption, but it does not touch durability or WE.

I said all along that a cap is needed. And we need to be able to draft from the first session til the end of the second in every division.

I also said that location has become more important because, you won't have access to these players if you are in a surrounded area while other teams, pretty much left alone, will.

The difference between divsions has shrinked. Either you get rid of D3 altogether and make a good D2 division or you go ahead with caps. Some D3 are already top D2 teams.

You are not on topic. You're pushing your agenda in a thinly-veiled way.

So I too think people should stay on topic. Starting with you.

I am on topic, it shows what happened with 3.0 and what we should get away from to make the game more enjoyable. It's a 50-60 overall swing... at D3.

When did the topic switch from comparing 3.0 to 2.0 to capping recruiting? Please quote that post cuz I can't find it.

Posted by zorzii on 6/21/2017 2:37:00 PM (view original):
I think people should stay on topic. It proves overall rating is a lot higher, Trenton 5 per stats is probably a good assumption, but it does not touch durability or WE.

I said all along that a cap is needed. And we need to be able to draft from the first session til the end of the second in every division.

I also said that location has become more important because, you won't have access to these players if you are in a surrounded area while other teams, pretty much left alone, will.

The difference between divsions has shrinked. Either you get rid of D3 altogether and make a good D2 division or you go ahead with caps. Some D3 are already top D2 teams.

Granted about staying on topic but silliness need to be challenged.

I concur with most of what you are saying. Part of the problem, IMHO, is the lower density of human players. DII and DIII schools are benefitting from ghost town-like conditions. Couple this with a terrible SIM recruiting logic and you end up with lower division super teams. DI SIM schools should be signing most of the leftover DI recruits that are currently falling to DII and DIII. We wouldn't need a cap if the SIM programming was better.

Posted by gomiami1972 on 6/21/2017 3:48:00 PM (view original):

Posted by zorzii on 6/21/2017 2:37:00 PM (view original):
I think people should stay on topic. It proves overall rating is a lot higher, Trenton 5 per stats is probably a good assumption, but it does not touch durability or WE.

I said all along that a cap is needed. And we need to be able to draft from the first session til the end of the second in every division.

I also said that location has become more important because, you won't have access to these players if you are in a surrounded area while other teams, pretty much left alone, will.

The difference between divsions has shrinked. Either you get rid of D3 altogether and make a good D2 division or you go ahead with caps. Some D3 are already top D2 teams.

Granted about staying on topic but silliness need to be challenged.

I concur with most of what you are saying. Part of the problem, IMHO, is the lower density of human players. DII and DIII schools are benefitting from ghost town-like conditions. Couple this with a terrible SIM recruiting logic and you end up with lower division super teams. DI SIM schools should be signing most of the leftover DI recruits that are currently falling to DII and DIII. We wouldn't need a cap if the SIM programming was better.

If SIM recruiting isn't fixed (and I am not even sure it will be enough), it needs a cap. I am good at recruiting, not excellent. Lots of D3 teams would beat my WNMU D2... Are we in the same division? Imagine newbies... they will quit long before they can figure this out with these super teams pounding them.

That's horseshit and you know it. Now get back on topic or show me where to topic became capping recruiting. YOU wanted people to stay on topic. YOU.

Posted by gomiami1972 on 6/21/2017 3:48:00 PM (view original):

Posted by zorzii on 6/21/2017 2:37:00 PM (view original):
I think people should stay on topic. It proves overall rating is a lot higher, Trenton 5 per stats is probably a good assumption, but it does not touch durability or WE.

I said all along that a cap is needed. And we need to be able to draft from the first session til the end of the second in every division.

I also said that location has become more important because, you won't have access to these players if you are in a surrounded area while other teams, pretty much left alone, will.

The difference between divsions has shrinked. Either you get rid of D3 altogether and make a good D2 division or you go ahead with caps. Some D3 are already top D2 teams.

Granted about staying on topic but silliness need to be challenged.

I concur with most of what you are saying. Part of the problem, IMHO, is the lower density of human players. DII and DIII schools are benefitting from ghost town-like conditions. Couple this with a terrible SIM recruiting logic and you end up with lower division super teams. DI SIM schools should be signing most of the leftover DI recruits that are currently falling to DII and DIII. We wouldn't need a cap if the SIM programming was better.

Maybe SIM programming would change how good players D3 teams were signing. Most likely it would.

But so would a cap. Which would be better? I think that's where we all disagree..