Posted by laramiebob on 6/9/2020 8:24:00 PM (view original):
Why is granny outraged?

Granny didn’t like the tranny.

Posted by strikeout26 on 6/9/2020 8:25:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 6/9/2020 8:20:00 PM (view original):
I'm really interested to see what guitarguy's defense of C-16 would have been had you not intervened. I guarantee he had never actually read the bill or looked into it. Probably heard Jordan Peterson or Andy Ngo mention it and got outraged at all the trannys.

Who is Andy Ngo? Is he Asian or was that a typo?

He's a conservative "journalist" that guitarguy cited earlier.

No, it's not a typo. He's Asian.

Posted by tangplay on 6/9/2020 8:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 6/9/2020 8:25:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 6/9/2020 8:20:00 PM (view original):
I'm really interested to see what guitarguy's defense of C-16 would have been had you not intervened. I guarantee he had never actually read the bill or looked into it. Probably heard Jordan Peterson or Andy Ngo mention it and got outraged at all the trannys.

Who is Andy Ngo? Is he Asian or was that a typo?

He's a conservative "journalist" that guitarguy cited earlier.

No, it's not a typo. He's Asian.

I saw video today. The only thing the left didn't do was sit on his esophagus for 8+ minutes. Racist left.

Posted by tangplay on 6/9/2020 8:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 6/9/2020 8:25:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 6/9/2020 8:20:00 PM (view original):
I'm really interested to see what guitarguy's defense of C-16 would have been had you not intervened. I guarantee he had never actually read the bill or looked into it. Probably heard Jordan Peterson or Andy Ngo mention it and got outraged at all the trannys.

Who is Andy Ngo? Is he Asian or was that a typo?

He's a conservative "journalist" that guitarguy cited earlier.

No, it's not a typo. He's Asian.

I’ll have to take a listen. I like to hear all sides. My listening this morning was a professor that wrote a book titled “Why Marx was right.” The irony is that he spent the first five minutes trying to make money off of a book that bashes capitalism. I found that entertaining.

In no way am I being disengenious with this post. I try to not read the news during the day because it depresses me too much but the hypocrisy of this whole situation just really upsets me.

I will admit I had no idea who that Ngo guy is, but I think Jordan Peterson gets falsely maligned by people who have never actually read his work. There is a lot of wisdom in 12 Rules for life. In regards to my morning post, I will submit to many of tang's rebuttals. I still think there's a double standard at work.

Thanks for at least admitting that you looked at the other perspective. That's more than some here (all3) will do.

Peterson's self-help stuff might be OK, but his politics are asinine. If you want to get into his feminism arguments, I would love to do that too.

Okay. Let’s go on his feminism articles. I will own you on that. That will be an easy win and put me up 2-1 in the series. Lucky for you, it’s a best of 7.

What specifically? I'm referring to his claim that women cannot coexist with men in the workplace.

Also that makeup should be banned and such.

I have listened to nearly everything that he has online and I’m not sure I’ve ever heard him say either of those. Please post a link.

You are absolutely correct that he doesn't say that women cannot coexist with men in the workplace or that makeup should be banned. He just lists out reasons why women cannot coexist with men and why makeup forces men to sexually assault women, and then says that maybe women cannot coexist with men.

That's what annoys me about him.

I'm referring to this interview:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9dZSlUjVls

If you had something else in mind regarding Peterson and feminism, I'm open to that as well.

You proposed the debate. I’m not particularly interested in engaging in it, but I will.

I find his proposition in the video to be very reasonable. You misinterpreted what he was saying. His argument was that we need to draw a specific line to know what the boundaries are. He gave two extreme examples with the lipstick and negligees, saying that the line falls somewhere in the middle, but it hasn’t been defined.

Posted by tangplay on 6/9/2020 8:06:00 PM (view original):
At this point, I have no reason to assume that guitarguy will defend his statements. I've tried to combat his arguments, but he just ignores them and repeats the same BS talking points. He'll probably do the same with the C-16 stuff.

We hopefully debate arguments, friend, rather than combat. I'm not sure why he won't engage.

Posted by strikeout26 on 6/9/2020 8:25:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 6/9/2020 8:20:00 PM (view original):
I'm really interested to see what guitarguy's defense of C-16 would have been had you not intervened. I guarantee he had never actually read the bill or looked into it. Probably heard Jordan Peterson or Andy Ngo mention it and got outraged at all the trannys.

Who is Andy Ngo? Is he Asian or was that a typo?

I asked that several days ago, I think.