70m - Giants Through the Ages
I did all the pre-work for this theme, but in the end I only had time to build the Giants, so hopefully I picked the right one! I started with looking at the infield positions to try to identify franchises that had good options at all 4. I was primarily looking for good range and speed, ideally switch hitters or lefties to get the platoon advantage as often as possible. Then I tried doing the same for pitching - figured out the general $/IP range I'd be looking at and the guys who looked best in that range. I didn't necessarily need deadballers since I was probably going to have high range, bad glove infielders. Since it's a lower cap, I really didn't want to waste any money on 200k guys who wouldn't play much, so I wanted everyone to contribute.
Teams like the Yankees and Dodgers weren't great fits since their deadball years didn't have many good players - or even into the 20s for the Dodgers. The Giants had Frisch, Bancroft, McGann and Buck Herzog, and even though it ate away at most of their deadball years, they also had decent pitching options past the 20s (Burkett and Swift, Logan Webb, Hubbell) and the ability to play in AT&T Park which suited their players well. One thing they did NOT have was guys who could steal bases well, which is unfortunate since it's a staple of lower cap teams. When it came time to build out the team, I added '71 Ken Henderson and Fred Lewis who can steal some bags and hit some triples. Interestingly, I ended up booting Frisch for Bancroft at 2B, so I've got cloned Bancrofts up the middle - 1920 at SS and 1923 at 2B.
This team ended up a little weird, as lower cap teams often do. I've only got about 640 PAs at catcher and other than Herzog, that's the position with the
best coverage. I don't really remember if I was planning to play guys down to 95% or if it just ended up that way. I've got a 5-man rotation (Logan Webb, Dummy Taylor, Kelly Downs, Burkett and Hubbell) that has 964 IP, which is a lot for this cap, so I think I'll be rotating these guys through the bullpen on their throw days.
I never got around to building out the Reds (probably would have been my second choice) or messing with this one too much, other than fixing the rotation when I picked Swift and Burkett from the same 5-year period. Even for a 70m cap they look underwhelming to me now, but hopefully the range and speed and switch hitting gives them a reasonable floor so they won't be terrible.
80m - Homers at the Bat
Well, at least I had a definite plan for this team. Now we'll play the games and see if it's a good one. I loaded up the pitching staff with modern guys for 2 reasons - one, they can get a much better HR/9+ for a raw HR/9 of 0.75, and two, I've got some truly terrible fielders who can use all the help they can get. My 5-man rotation is Hunter Brown, Charlie Morton, Julio Urias, Chris Bassitt and Hyun-Jin Ryu. Kevin Brown '04 is here as a swingman who can make some spot starts if needed. KB and Brandon Morrow are the only pitchers on my staff who ever had a price adjustment. Most of my pitchers are over 150 for their HR/9+ and have HR/9# numbers in the 0.5-0.6 range. Will it matter? I'm not sure. We're playing in Yankee III to get as many homers as possible. It's the only +1B park in my division (we've got a Kingdome, a GABP and a Sicks) which doesn't surprise me. I've also got a bullpen full of guys with high IP/G just in case keeping the ball in the park is an early symptom of in-game fatigue.
On offense I wanted to try to load up on hitters whose power would normalize well - ie, NOT guys from the 90s and 2000s. My 2 favorites are here - Tilly Walker and Gavvy Cravath - as well as Mel Ott and Hank Greenberg. I'm trying out 1893 Jack Clements (4.52 HR/100 raw, 6 HR/100#) behind the plate, though I'm less sure of him. There really aren't many old-timey guys who can hit bombs and play up the middle, so I'm rolling with '88 Strawberry in CF, '91 HoJo at SS and 2025 Jazz at 2B. Those guys can also run a little bit so if everyone else has noodle-armed catchers like I do, maybe we'll get some steals.
If nothing else, this team should be fun!
100m - A Dozen Years of 2021 Dodgers
I suspect this will be one of many 2021 Dodgers teams. First thing I did was check my notes. Last year we had a "twist the same team to 80m and 120m" league. The usual suspects - 2021 Dodgers, 95/98/99 Indians, 2010 Mariners, 97/98 Mariners, 1906-09 Cubs, 1914 Boston, 27/28 A's, 30s Yankees with Grove/Ruth/Gehrig, 00/06 Yankees... In my 80m league the 09 As beat the 2021 Dodgers, and then at 120, the Twisted 1910 Cubs outplayed the 1913 Pittsburgh Pirates.
I looked at the 09 A's and didn't think they were a good fit. I played around with some of those deadball Cubs teams but they all needed the same years. I did NOT build the team I should have tried - the 27 Yankees, being a pretty good team on their own, would probably look good if you just made Ruth and Gehrig a little cheaper. I did look at the 28 Yankees with Coveleski but couldn't find enough twists to get him back to 1917. The other team I got close with was the 2009 Yankees, but I couldn't get into the rotation. Needless to say, I loved this theme and I wish I had another month to build teams for it.
But I decided to settle down with the 2021 Dodgers and see if I could get comfortable. Like the 27 Yankees, they're pretty good on their own, but have some chances to tweak them. Interestingly, once I switched Cody Bellinger to 2019, I realized I only had one player who was twisted forward (22 Gonsolin) and everyone else went back. These are the twists I ended up with:
| 1 - 20/22 |
Gonsolin |
| 2 - 19/23 |
Belli |
| 3 - 18/24 |
Bauer |
| 4 - 17/25 |
Kersh |
| 5 - 2016 |
Betts |
| 6 - 2015 |
Pollock |
| 7 - 2014 |
CT3 |
| 8 - 2013 |
N Jones |
| 9 - 2012 |
Kenley |
| 10 - 2011 |
N Feliz |
| 11 - 2010 |
Albert |
Jones, Kenley and Feliz were really just fillers to get Albert back to 2010. A guy like Kenley really is a gem for this kind of league, because you can just twist him to whatever season you need him. This team isn't perfect - I couldn't really solve shortstop since every twist I wanted for Seager went to someone else, so I'm just using his 409 PA from 2021 and platooning with Chris Taylor, and I couldn't find a better solution for 3B than just leaving JT alone. I've got 6 starters (924 IP without Gonsolin, 1054 with him) and nobody who's ideal as a closer. My biggest worry is that I've got 2016 Betts and 2015 Pollock batting 1-2 and I'm worried their OBPs will be too low. But I love the pitching despite its flaws and I hope they'll carry us through.
110m - Giant Brave Philly A-Astros
None of the 4 teams I built for this league were actually compliant because I am a moron and just picked any old team instead of one from each column. Why? I have no idea. (Cards-Phils-Reds-BoSox-Dodgers ... Giants-Cards-Reds-Phillies-Guardians ... Giants-Phils-A's-Cards-Astros). I realize I named this team out of order ... Giants 20-40, Phils 41-61, A's 62-82, Braves 83-03, Astros 04-25.
So I cobbled together this entry on very short notice after I realized my idiocy. Meaning they'll either be atrocious or win 104 games. I wasn't starting from nothing - I've got most of the same Giants and Astros that I had used in the earlier iterations. I started this theme similar to the way I started the 70m one - looked at/wrote down all the various players who would fit into each bucket and tried to figure out which puzzle pieces worked well together.
The Giants have the inevitable Frisch/Bancroft tandem, and can add Bill Terry to the mix. The Astros have too many SPs to use them all (Cole, Verlander, Hunter Brown, Clemens, Cristian Javier). The A's had Rickey and Mitchell Page who can run. The Phillies had Schoolboy Rowe and Harry Walker. That left the 83-03 era with Column C. I mostly needed 3B, another SP who could fit into a 5-man, and another bat, so I've got Smoltz in his 187ip season, Terry Pendleton as an A+ range guy and Chipper as my DH. Will this work? I have no idea.
125m - Panda-monium on the Animal Farm
What is this team? What makes them different than all the other (likely very similar) teams? I guess that's why we play the games.
I started with the pitching. I figured I was going to end up with 12 pitchers and 13 hitters (2C-6IF-5OF) so I had to make a staff out of that. I just drafted 9 SP-level guys, 5 RH and 4 LH, and figure I'll make tandems out of them and swap guys in and out when they get tired. (RH squad: Hearn, Gonsolin, Zach Plesac, Strider, Eovaldi ... LH squad: Kershaw, Pollet, Liriano, Trevor Rogers) with Clase and Liam Hendriks as the ace relievers and the 108-IP Rivera rounding things out.
I'm not actually convinced I've got enough PAs on offense. But I've got a lot of guys with position flexibility so I'm hoping I can make it work. Dickey and Kendall are catching. Votto/Matt Williams and Pablo Sandoval are a trio at 1B/3B. Hanley and Lajoie are anchoring SS/2B, with George Grantham doing 2B/OF and Miguel Rojas manning SS and utility infield. Reggie Smith and Joe Dimaggio have got CF, with Ted Williams and Bob Caruthers as the primary guys in the corners. Extra PAs from Grantham and Reggie will cover their shortages (I hope). We're playing in PNC Park which is my favorite stadium in real life, so at least we've got that going for us, which is nice.
140m - Your Words Just Alphabetize Me (Accidentally Ohtani)
My original team name was too long to fit, but the Ohtani part is a big part of the story.
I went and dug up my teams from last time we did this (was either 2013 or 2014 and they were 70m/110m, so they were not great comps, plus no alphabet requirement.) Anyway, the fact that it can be the same season makes things moderately easier for the bench, instead of having to do different seasons and find guys with 2 useful bench seasons. It also helps with the alphabet requirements, since if I just want to make QUIZY guys bench players both times if it makes things easier.
The number of hitters and pitchers who are even really useful at 140m is pretty small. When you take the number of them that can also be useful at 80m, even in a different role, you're getting a pretty small pool. That's before you even add in the alphabet requirement. So I'll be curious to see if we end up with a lot of similar players here.
I started with the rotation - Kershaw, Greinke, Arrieta, Verlander, Bauer. Then both JV and Bauer combined forces and became Bill Bernhard. The infield is built around Roger Connor (finally!), Lajoie, Yount and Terry Pendleton. The outfield is Rickey, Speaker and Delahanty, with Buck Ewing behind the dish. I used the remaining letters to fill out the bullpen and the bench - Jenks, Isringhausen, Zaun, Foulke, Jose Uribe, Jack Quinn... all the guys you'd expect. Trevor Rogers' 25 season is a bullpen piece in 140m and the 5th starter at 80m.
So then I had a problem.. I was a little short on innings at 80m but I didn't really want to add another pitcher to my 140m team. I was trying to find a guy like Reb Russell or Joe Wood who could hit for the 140m team. Oooooooh, you know who's like that? Staring me right in the face is the face of baseball in 2026... ladies and gentlemen ... SHOHEI OHTANI! So I reworked the 140m team to have Ohtani 2024 at DH and the 52ip 2018 version on the 80m team.
This is what the final accounting looks like:
| A |
Arrieta |
| B |
Bernhard |
| C |
Connor |
| D |
Delahanty |
| E |
Ewing |
| F |
Foulke |
| G |
Greinke |
| H |
R Henderson |
| I |
Izzy |
| J |
Jenks |
| K |
Kershaw |
| L |
Lajoie |
| M |
S Marte |
| N |
Nunamaker |
| O |
Ohtani |
| P |
Pendleton |
| Q |
J QUinn |
| R |
T Rogers |
| S |
Speaker |
| T |
Trienen |
| U |
Jose Uribe |
| V |
L Varland |
| W |
Walsh |
| Y |
Yount |
| Z |
Zaun |